The "who, what, when, where and why" of American History.

[commonsense]

What on earth are you talking about, Chapman did not have a trial. He pleaded guilty, thus a trial was not neccessary.


Given the fact that the murder of Lennon was a conspiracy, the only thing that the court did was to inadvertently pervert the course of justice by creating the false impression that Chapman was a lone nut.


But it was certainly a nice try.

Keep trying...

 

[CDNBear]

What on earth are you talking about, Chapman did not have a trial. He pleaded guilty, thus a trial was not neccessary.

Hearing, sentencing, whatever.

Still a pathetic attempt.

Given the fact that the murder of Lennon was a conspiracy, the only thing that the court did was to inadvertently pervert the course of justice by creating the false impression that Chapman was a lone nut.

:roll:

More nonsense. Why don't you disprove what I've already posted, before you ask me to abuse new crap.

But it was certainly a nice try.

No, that was a pathetic try, but keep going.

Keep trying...

Please do. You keep saying that, but you haven't proven Perdomo was the same Perdomo reported to have died in Cuban custory, or any of the the other 12 Perdomo's in 2506.

 

[commonsense]

Yeah.... Morin was convicted on the same connect-the-dots supposition as you accuse Nixon with Lennon.

CASE CLOSED!

Given the fact that I am an advocate for the wrongfully accused, let's just say that this
this assumption is, well...............

 

[CDNBear]

Given the fact that I am an advocate for the wrongfully accused, let's just say that this
this assumption is, well...............

Not at all. The authorities employed the same flawed analyzing of evidence and predetermined notions as your source.

Hence why his conviction was overturned, and it was so easy to poke huge holes in your theories.

 

[DaSleeper]

Anyone who feels unsafe clicking on a link posted in this thread if using internet explorer just right click on it, view properties and you will there see the source......
On second thought.....Forget it.....we all know they are from the same source...........................................................

 

[commonsense]

Not at all. The authorities employed the same flawed analyzing of evidence and predetermined notions as your source.

Hence why his conviction was overturned, and it was so easy to poke huge holes in your theories.

You have not poked a single hole anywhere, all you do is laugh at your own jokes, which is quite amusing.

I guess this explains why you think you have poked holes in my theories.

Of course, if I had shared any theories with you, then I could look for the holes, but the fact that Lennon was assassinated is no longer a theory.

I certainly understand all the denial, but that's quite normal because errors in human cognition are very typical, and you are certainly no exception !

 

[lone wolf]

​

Available on DVD....

Doesn't that tell you something?

Did you happen to notice the above pic is captioned whatif222?

Common sense? Use some....

 

[DaSleeper]

​

Available on DVD....

Doesn't that tell you something?

Did you happen to notice the above pic is captioned whatif222?

Common sense? Use some....

He won't get it8O:lol:

 

[commonsense]

What an incredible DVD it would make --GREAT STORY !

​

Available on DVD....

Doesn't that tell you something?

Did you happen to notice the above pic is captioned whatif222?

Common sense? Use some....

It would certainly make an incredible DVD.

Can you imagine, the assassins kept the name of John lennon's Doorman a secret for over 7 years?


WHAT A MASSIVE COVER-UP !

 

[CDNBear]

You have not poked a single hole anywhere...

This is you hiding from the truth.

all you do is laugh at your own jokes, which are quite amusing.

fify, and I know.

I guess this explains why you think you have poked holes in my theories.

OK, if the posts didn't, prove me wrong. I lived up to your challenge. Now how about you reciprocate. If you can, if you can't, I predict more of this same song and dance, lol.

Of course, if I had shared any theories with you, then I could look for the holes, but the fact that Lennon was assassinated is no longer a theory.

According to you. According the the State of NY, he was murdered by Mark David Chapman.

Besides that, there are other theories of yours, I have sufficiently torn apart, that you conveniently ignore as well.

I certainly understand all the denial, but that's quite normal because errors in human cognition are very typical, and you are certainly no exception !

Again with the personal attacks.

Why is it you resort to personal attacks, when your theories get torn apart?

 

[commonsense]

But why spend money getting the DVD when you can read all about it here?


The Men Who Killed Lennon



Save your pennies, the read is good enough !

 

[CDNBear]

Re: What an incredible DVD it would make --GREAT STORY !

Can you imagine, the assassins kept the name of John lennon's Doorman a secret for over 7 years?

No they didn't, it was read into the record, when Chapman first went to trial. As a witness, his statement would have been read into evidence at disclosure. As is customary at all criminal proceedings, until you produce those court documents, without his name on them, it's just more lies.

WHAT A MASSIVE COVER-UP !

What a massive lie.

I don't use big type in whole sentences, it just has the appearance of desperation.

Save your pennies, the read is good enough !

I don't read fiction.

 

[DaSleeper]

All we seem to be getting here is Linkspam from a site that has been banned in a few forums:roll:

 

[CDNBear]

All we seem to be getting here is Linkspam from a site that has been banned in a few forums:roll:

After reviewing the thread, you are indeed correct.

This person is obviously not here to debate On several occasions, he/she has made claims about the site in question. While suggesting we go there several times.

I have reported the OP as spam.

 

[commonsense]

After reviewing the thread, you are indeed correct.

This person is obviously not here to debate On several occasions, he/she has made claims about the site in question. While suggesting we go there several times.

I have reported the OP as spam.

Given the fact that you have resorted to falsely claiming that I am making personal attacks against you, you are obviously trying to censor me because you have failed to discredit anything I have ever said on this thread.

 

[CDNBear]

Given the fact that you have resorted to falsely claiming that I am making personal attacks against you, you are obviously trying to censor me because you have failed to discredit anything I have ever said on this thread.

Dude, you have no idea who you're talking to.

I am one of the strongest supporters of free speech at this site. I have even asked the management to rescind the banning of a perpetual ideologue, that makes you look like Mother Theresa.

I have failed at nothing. You challenged me to take apart your theories. I did. You were asked to disprove what I posted. You have not yet done so. You were asked to stop the personal attacks. You post some nonsense about "the human condition", as if I must have some defect, because you can't support your argument, with using cut and pastes from a single site. A site that you have continually cited throughout this thread.

You aren't here to debate, that's proven by the fact that you have yet to address any of my evidence, with anything but claims of toxic minds, human conditions and baffle gab as you bounce from one theory to another.

You are here for two reasons, to preach and spam.

If you are not a spammer, address my posts, in proper debate format and debate me.

If you're a spammer troll, feel free to carry on as you are and you'll end up being a thing of the past.

 

[commonsense]

I have repeatedly indicated that mr. Chapman did not go to trial because he pleaded guilty yet you repeatedly claim otherwise.

For some reason, you are always extremely fast and loose with the facts.

 

[karrie]

This thread is closed.