Middle East War - Iran- Syria -Lebanon - Israel - US

Will US/Israel permit Iran - Nuclear Weapons -or will we have War or Not

  • Will the US attack Iran to prevent /slow down /destroy their nuclear program

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Will The US permit Iran to go Nuclear

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    9
  • Poll closed .

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
Doesn't that just prove my 'all options on the table' shows that once the fuel-rods are on site then it remains an active target. That they are still standing means 'whomever' has been holding back and the only reason to do that would seem to be wait and when it is fully operational then destroy it. Not only killing the plant but also all the inhabitants in the fall-out zone (eventually). Israel already targets 12 year old kids in Gaza


Is that what all our new fighters are for. I would have thought a series of S-400 defense systems would be a better deterrent to being invaded. Luckily we have the US to the south to 'slow-em-down'.
If things go wrong with that move I hope they come up with a better story than the ill-fated 'rescue' mission where the 'NAVY' forgot about the desert having 'DUST' and therefore 'FORGOT' to put on any air-filters and the first way-point was also the end of the mission.

That site will be blown off the face of the Earth, before it is fully operational, and there is nothing wrong with that. Even Iran's so called friends will breath a sigh of relief. Even though I personally hated it (cold weather), the U.S. is very well trained and equipped for the Artic.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
There you go, you seem to forget the 'cold' is what brings relief from the mosquitoes.
No doubt you would also be willing to back a long-term plan that made sure they could not retaliate in any way shape or form.
Perhaps Israel will let Canada park all her new jets over there for safe keeping. What would our role be, would we (Canada)be protectors of the ships coming in from the Med with all those lovely drones etc?

Should be a real challenge to go against somebody who hasn't been pre disarmed.
I hear Lebanon told the US to keep her hardware and they will make their military purchases elsewhere. I wonder if that would include Iran's hand-held lazar guided rpg (copper backed by TNT) rounds.
Wonder if they got that rotary clip working properly yet?
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Come on moderators. She-ite is not a bad word. It is hard for DG to make his point if you won't let him use basic nouns.
Actually Bar, DG may have spelled it wrong, causing the automatic filter to deal with it.

I don't think the Mods had anything to do with it.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Doesn't that just prove my 'all options on the table' shows that once the fuel-rods are on site then it remains an active target. That they are still standing means 'whomever' has been holding back and the only reason to do that would seem to be wait and when it is fully operational then destroy it. Not only killing the plant but also all the inhabitants in the fall-out zone (eventually). Israel already targets 12 year old kids in Gaza


Is that what all our new fighters are for. I would have thought a series of S-400 defense systems would be a better deterrent to being invaded. Luckily we have the US to the south to 'slow-em-down'.
If things go wrong with that move I hope they come up with a better story than the ill-fated 'rescue' mission where the 'NAVY' forgot about the desert having 'DUST' and therefore 'FORGOT' to put on any air-filters and the first way-point was also the end of the mission.

MHZ

Wrong - The holdup on activationg the plant was from the Russians - Have you noted that Iran plans 10 enrichment plants - why 10 -
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Iran is scared of Israeli terrorism and aggression and must defend herself with nukes.
Right - And then the rest of the Mid east starts an arms race to acquire Nukes - You put simple in the word simpleton.
Christ - I hope you are sterile.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
All started by terrorist Israel

All started by Arab Countries attcaking the State of Isreal in 48 - Do you honestly believe they give a shxt about the Palestinians - See how Palestinians are treated in Arab countries

Read the books - Palestine - Israel was to be divided up by jordan, Egypt,Syris and lebanon

Equals no Palestine - Get up to par on the facts before you jump in -

Nothing like someone like yourself that hates Jews and ignores the facts.

I take it that you are the low hanging fruit in your family.
 

CUBert

Time Out
Aug 15, 2010
1,259
2
38
Canada
All started by Arab Countries attcaking the State of Isreal in 48 - Do you honestly believe they give a shxt about the Palestinians - See how Palestinians are treated in Arab countries

Read the books - Palestine - Israel was to be divided up by jordan, Egypt,Syris and lebanon

Equals no Palestine - Get up to par on the facts before you jump in -

Nothing like someone like yourself that hates Jews and ignores the facts.

I take it that you are the low hanging fruit in your family.

Hahahaha, what does 1948 have to do with today's Iran, when was the last time a country was militarily hostile towards Israel ?

Now Israel on the other hand is hostile consistently towards its neighbours and foreigner visitors.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Hahahaha, what does 1948 have to do with today's Iran, when was the last time a country was militarily hostile towards Israel ?

Now Israel on the other hand is hostile consistently towards its neighbours and foreigner visitors.

Countries Hostile to Israel - Syria - Jordan - Iran - Is that enough for a person like yourself that is far out of their depth on knowledge

No answer to my other point about Arabs dividing up the so called state of Palestine and Israel - That is if they had won the war. Is that question a tad difficult for a person such as yourself that has limited knowledge of history or of most matters to be blunt?
 

CUBert

Time Out
Aug 15, 2010
1,259
2
38
Canada
Jordan signed a peace treaty with Israel back in 94, they're very friendly towards Israel and one of the few countries in the middle east that'll recognizes Israel's existence.
Syria is angry about the Golan heights Israel took during the war.
Israel is more hostile towards Iran than Iran is to Israel.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Jordan signed a peace treaty with Israel back in 94, they're very friendly towards Israel and one of the few countries in the middle east that'll recognizes Israel's existence.
Syria is angry about the Golan heights Israel took during the war.
Israel is more hostile towards Iran than Iran is to Israel.

Well, two out of three isn't bad.

When did Israel attack Iran??????

Iran attacks Israel almost daily through its proxy armies.....those of Hezbollah, Hamas, and Islamic Jihad........all armed and financially supported by Iran.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Well, two out of three isn't bad.

When did Israel attack Iran??????

Iran attacks Israel almost daily through its proxy armies.....those of Hezbollah, Hamas, and Islamic Jihad........all armed and financially supported by Iran.
Just so I am clear on something. What would an attack on Iran look like? Running countless articles in the Media would seem to put Israel far in the lead in numbers if public media is included. If they are offering training and funds and supplies to 'rebels' in northern Iraq to cause disturbances inside Iran that is waging war already. Do you actually deny that Israel does have proxies that are there to cause instability to the ones on Israel's 'list'? It is longer than the ones you mention BTW.

Once there are fuel rods on site (and verified) does that mean Iran has the right to add enough defenses to 'assure' an attack, that would release radiation, is repelled? The only thing an operating facility (21 century upgrades included) is going to do is lessen their need to import gasoline and it releases more product for export. Those are not aspirations to be frowned on in this day and age. By being just defensive Iran has extra billions to send down the ladder so that even in the far corners of the land they can be as up-to-date as somebody deep inside a modern city. Having a thriving democracy would showboat that huge amounts are not needed for the war machines. In all the money we have spent on air defense since WWII we have not hat to shoot one 'round' off in real anger. Everything spent is basically piss down the drain when every red cent could have been spent on something that was of some tangible use. A few creators in the muskeg is hardly a legacy that must be close to a trillion over that 60 year period with just the 'offensive' machinery. Smaller arms for a strong defense.
Canada, the US and Israel should offer no opinion on how Iran wants to
supply it's military. I don't hear Canada accepting input from Iran on whether we should do the upgrades that are coming. The upgrades are to keep up with the fire and control upgrades that turn the fighter over to a central command in the times of a 'heated battle' anyway, Something our primitive F/A-18's cannot be updated to do and so they will be made scrap or sold to another nation for pennies on the dollar. I hear Columbia is looking for some fast long-distance so we should gift them to Venezuela creating a demand in Columbia and that would create factory jobs in the US, which they need.
 
Last edited: