Quit picking on Obama……

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
:lol::lol::lol:

The US will never leave either country....they still have 50,000 troops in Germany for crying out loud......and I am pretty sure we beat Hitler.

Now USA is in Iraq or Afghanistan at the sufferance of those countries. If they ask USA to leave, they will leave. As to Germany, I assume there are there with the consent of German government.
 

A4NoOb

Nominee Member
Feb 27, 2009
83
3
8
The article is by Michael Scott Moore, a right wing journalist. I read up a bit about him, he is a strong proponent of home schooling which is the darling project of the religious right.

But I must give you credit, you evidently stay up the nights trying to find articles by right wing journalists all over the world trashing Obama.

Incidentally, have you looked at right wing British press? Telegraph, Daily Mail etc.? i am sure you will find plenty of articles in there trashing Obama, how it is a certainty that he will lose in 2012, and how it is equally certain that Republicans will win in 2012 and get huge majorities in the Senate and the House.

Oh dear, as I do recall from back a few months you're attitude is as stagnant as ever (how ironic for a liberal activist on these forums). Dismiss articles on the pretense of anxious profiling. I could apply the same logic to every poster in this thread :roll:.

SirJosephPorter said:
That is because Bush won the election by fraud, his friends in the US Supreme Court handed him the election. And TownHall is an Obama hating website, there probably are hundreds of articles like that on TownHall (it wouldn't surprise me if there are five or six on the very day this article was posted) Indeed, any columnist who does not hate Obama blindly will probably be kicked out from TownHall.

LOL are you seriously going down this road again? After being so incessantly refuted how many times? We've been through how the Florida Supreme Court has issued numerous recounts for the 2000 election- bearing the only net result of more results for Bush. The Supreme Court did not do anything for Bush 43, the fact that he won the Florida State was clear as day. You know, this is just proof positive that speaking with a haughty democrat will get you no where when he'll just repeat himself like a broken record.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Wow, I never thought you'd defend the imperial USA.:roll:

Hey, I call them as I see them, I don't care whom I am defending.

Oh dear, as I do recall from back a few months you're attitude is as stagnant as ever (how ironic for a liberal activist on these forums). Dismiss articles on the pretense of anxious profiling. I could apply the same logic to every poster in this thread :roll:.

By all means, feel free to apply the same logic to every poster, not only in this thread, but in the entire forum. There is noting wrong with that. When it is well known that a columnist or a journalist has a well known bias to the right or the left, why should anybody give any credence to what he is saying about politics? We know what he is going to say about any issue without the bother of reading what he is saying.

It is a forgone conclusion that a right wing columnist is going to trash Obama every chance he gets and is going to praise Republican politicians to high Heaven every chance he gets (and a left wing columnist would do it in reverse).

LOL are you seriously going down this road again? After being so incessantly refuted how many times? We've been through how the Florida Supreme Court has issued numerous recounts for the 2000 election- bearing the only net result of more results for Bush. The Supreme Court did not do anything for Bush 43, the fact that he won the Florida State was clear as day. You know, this is just proof positive that speaking with a haughty democrat will get you no where when he'll just repeat himself like a broken record.

Florida Supreme Court was handling the issue according to Florida laws. All the Republican justices on the US Supreme Court had been bleating about states’ rights all these years. Being a conservative meant supporting state rights.

However, all this conservative philosophy went straight out the window when it came to rescuing their friend, Bush. Then these same Republican justices had no problem at all trampling all over state rights, the rights of Florida.

If these Republicans, Scalia, Thomas and others had remained true to their conservative principles, they would not have interfered with the process underway in Florida. But their aim was to award the presidency to a fellow Republican and in doing that they trampled on their own philosophy, state rights.

It was easily the most shameful episode in the history of the Supreme Court which will be remembered for a long time.
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
"When it is well known that a columnist or a journalist has a well known bias to the right or the left, why should anybody give any credence to what he is saying about politics? We know what he is going to say about any issue without the bother of reading what he is saying".

There is an old saying that obviously has no meaning for good old SirJosephPorter: "Even a blind pig can find an acorn". Or "Even a stupid farmer can grow big potatoes".

Dismissing an article based on nothing but who wrote it or where it has been published - without reading it - is the highest form of ignorance.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
No, being a Republican means you should be a supporter of states rights. The final count in Florida showed that Bush had won the state, so the court decision was right.

United States presidential election in Florida, 2000 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Final count was still going on in florida when US Supreme Court ordered Florida to stop the recount and awarded the presidency to their buddy, Bush.

"When it is well known that a columnist or a journalist has a well known bias to the right or the left, why should anybody give any credence to what he is saying about politics? We know what he is going to say about any issue without the bother of reading what he is saying".

There is an old saying that obviously has no meaning for good old SirJosephPorter: "Even a blind pig can find an acorn". Or "Even a stupid farmer can grow big potatoes".

Dismissing an article based on nothing but who wrote it or where it has been published - without reading it - is the highest form of ignorance.

Nothing of the sort, it is only common sense. Let us take the example of your hero, Limbaugh. Do we really have to listen to him to figure out what he is going to say about any issue? No way, he is going to blame Obama for each and every issue, no matter what.

Same thing can really be said about any far right columnist, the columnists that some conservatives here quote as Gospel truth. Larry Elder, Dr, Sewell, Anne Coulter etc. Why should I waste my time reading articles by them when I already know what they are going to say on any issue?
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
"Why should I waste my time reading articles by them when I already know what they are going to say on any issue?"

Just because you wasted a large portion of your life being blind, obstinate, stubburn and obtuse, there is no reason you should not see both sides and get some REAL education.

If any right minded person should follow your myopic world view, you could and should be dismissed as worthless, because if anyone is totally predictable, it is you.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
"Why should I waste my time reading articles by them when I already know what they are going to say on any issue?"

Just because you wasted a large portion of your life being blind, obstinate, stubburn and obtuse, there is no reason you should not see both sides and get some REAL education.

Again, why should i read anything written by a right wing extremist? And where does it stop? Do you read the material written by the Communist Party of Canada or Communist Party of USA? How about the Nazi party? Do you read their literature? If not, why not? You should get all the viewpoints, you know. If you don't read Nazi, KKK or Communist literature, you will miss out on their viewpoint.

If you are OK to miss out on what Communist or Nazi parties are saying, I am OK with missing what the right wing extremists like Limbaugh or Coulter are saying.
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
"Do you read the material written by the Communist Party of Canada or Communist Party of USA? How about the Nazi party? Do you read their literature? If not, why not? You should get all the viewpoints, you know. If you don't read Nazi, KKK or Communist literature, you will miss out on their viewpoint."

I must confess, I do not read publications by the KKK or the Nazi Party or the Communist Party. But I DO read articles by authors who are slobbering slaves to the Left. I watch MSNBC. I read articles by columnists on Washington Post, New York Times, Salon, Times, Newsweek and Huffington Post. After all only an idiot would refuse to know where the 'enemy' stands.

You seem to be proud of your ignorance and your ignorant views.
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
Final count was still going on in florida when US Supreme Court ordered Florida to stop the recount and awarded the presidency to their buddy, Bush.



Nothing of the sort, it is only common sense. Let us take the example of your hero, Limbaugh. Do we really have to listen to him to figure out what he is going to say about any issue? No way, he is going to blame Obama for each and every issue, no matter what.

Same thing can really be said about any far right columnist, the columnists that some conservatives here quote as Gospel truth. Larry Elder, Dr, Sewell, Anne Coulter etc. Why should I waste my time reading articles by them when I already know what they are going to say on any issue?

Yes, but when all the votes were in and tallied up Bush still won by a handful of votes, nothing would have changed..
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Here is a poll that is sure to be a conundrum for the self-confessed ignoramuses who refuse to see and/or read anything that disagrees with their own misguided prejudices.

Confidence Waning in Obama, U.S. Outlook - WSJ.com

A poll conducted by such divergent entities as Wall Street Journal and NBC?

How can it have any credibility?

No problem, Y.J.- give it a month and he'll be back in everyone's favour. :smile:
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
"No problem, Y.J.- give it a month and he'll be back in everyone's favour."

Of course, if, in a month

the unemployment rate is down to a reasonable rate,
the gushing hole in the Gulf is plugged,
he earns the respect of the military who conduct the war in Iraq and Afganistan,
he attends the business of the country rather than concerts and golf games,
the general population comes out of the coma they fell in November 2008.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
"No problem, Y.J.- give it a month and he'll be back in everyone's favour."

Of course, if, in a month

the unemployment rate is down to a reasonable rate,
the gushing hole in the Gulf is plugged,
he earns the respect of the military who conduct the war in Iraq and Afganistan,
he attends the business of the country rather than concerts and golf games,
the general population comes out of the coma they fell in November 2008.

How many jobs would you expect him to create?
Is it his job to put on a wet suit and go down there to plug the hole?
How many soldiers overseas disrespect him?
Is the president not allowed any time off for relaxation? Did Ike, Nixon, Reagan and Bush not play the odd game of golf?
I guess I must have missed the news flash about the widespread coma! :smile::smile:
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
"Do you read the material written by the Communist Party of Canada or Communist Party of USA? How about the Nazi party? Do you read their literature? If not, why not? You should get all the viewpoints, you know. If you don't read Nazi, KKK or Communist literature, you will miss out on their viewpoint."

I must confess, I do not read publications by the KKK or the Nazi Party or the Communist Party. But I DO read articles by authors who are slobbering slaves to the Left. I watch MSNBC. I read articles by columnists on Washington Post, New York Times, Salon, Times, Newsweek and Huffington Post. After all only an idiot would refuse to know where the 'enemy' stands.

You seem to be proud of your ignorance and your ignorant views.

I do scan the far right websites such as WND or TownHall from time to time, to get the sense of what they are saying. But as to reading individual articles, that is just a waste of time.

So you also draw the line somewhere, same as me. It is just that you draw the line at Communist Part,y Nazi Party etc., I draw the line at extreme right. It is just a difference in degree, not in kind. Who is to say that your line is correct and mine isn't?

Besides, I don't have to read their articles to know where extremists such as Anne Coulter or Larry Elder stand, that is obvious without reading their articles.

Yes, but when all the votes were in and tallied up Bush still won by a handful of votes, nothing would have changed..

We don’t know that, do we? If after the recount was done and Bush still had won, I assume Florida Supreme Court itself would have declared him to be the winner in Florida. And if after the recount (and supposed Bush win) the Florida Supreme court still had refused to certify Bush as the winner, then USSC would have been justified to get involved.

As it was, the Republicans on the USSC exposed themselves as hypocrites, when they trampled all over the rights of Florida.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66