Tory G8 abortion stance

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Re: Henry Morgantaler- Saint or Common Criminal?

I guess I'd like to think humanity is above being pleased at, or pondering the benefit of, culling the poor or uneducated rather than trying to find ways to alleviate the plight of the future generation, but we obviously aren't.
I'd like to think so too. We were just discussing the statistics and what they might imply, I don't think any value judgment was expressed or implied. I seriously doubt that the justices who struck down the abortion laws were thinking in terms of culling the disadvantaged, it appears to be, assuming the conclusion is correct, an unintended consequence that comes clear only in hindsight.

I'm not in principle a supporter of abortion, the feminist demand I heard so much in my youth, "free abortion on demand," never had any traction with me, it sounded too much like killing inconvenient people. The time to exercise control over your body is before you get pregnant, not after, but things don't always work out that way. And it's also an ethical dilemma I'll never face, I can't get pregnant. Even if I were the father of a fetus a woman wanted to abort and I objected, I think what she wants trumps what I want. I'm not the one who's pregnant, I do not have the right to bend her to my will. I can also see a case that she doesn't have the right to bend me to her will either, but we have to draw a line somewhere, and I draw it this way: the one who had it last calls the shots.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Re: What rights should a fetus have?

I know...... inconveniencing a woman for 9 months is FAR worse than killing the baby.

How dare anyone think that a woman should take responsibility for her actions.
As I've said before, what about the actions of the male? He gave away his rights when he shot his wad. If he kept his pants on there wouldn't be an abortion 100% of the time.
 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
Re: Henry Morgantaler- Saint or Common Criminal?

Dr. Henry Morgentaler C.M., a Member of the Order of Canada, is neither a ‘saint’ nor a ‘criminal’.

While there are millions of Canadians who likely despise Dr. Morgentaler for the fact that he was a driving force behind safe access to abortion, the fact is that without Dr. Morgentaler’s work, we would have rampant back-alley and coat hanger abortions; thousands of women every year would place themselves in grave danger to access abortion. He has been an influential Canadian in the driving for the enhancement of women’s rights.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Re: Henry Morgantaler- Saint or Common Criminal?

Dr. Henry Morgentaler C.M., a Member of the Order of Canada, is neither a ‘saint’ nor a ‘criminal’.

While there are millions of Canadians who likely despise Dr. Morgentaler for the fact that he was a driving force behind safe access to abortion, the fact is that without Dr. Morgentaler’s work, we would have rampant back-alley and coat hanger abortions; thousands of women every year would place themselves in grave danger to access abortion. He has been an influential Canadian in the driving for the enhancement of women’s rights.

Millions may despise Dr. Morgantaler, but even more millions praise him for his unceasing efforts and the sacrifices he made to make abortion legal (and safe). The Order of Canada was well deserved.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Re: Henry Morgantaler- Saint or Common Criminal?

I suppose.

I guess I'd like to think humanity is above being pleased at, or pondering the benefit of, culling the poor or uneducated rather than trying to find ways to alleviate the plight of the future generation, but we obviously aren't.

I am pleased, not at abortion per se, but at the fact that women have the freedom of choice. Freedom is above all, all important. If it has some unintended consequences, well, nobody promised that freedom will lead to everybody becoming happy and rich. Freedom has a price attached to it, and unintended consequences is one of them. Freedom is still preferable to bondage.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Re: What rights should a fetus have?

I'd rather call somebody a ****ty mom or dad than call them a killer. There is no shortage of help for mothers in the community no matter how old or how buzzed on crack and babies can overcome damn near anything even coming off crack after being born. It's far better to take the risk than it is to kill and potentially lose an Einstein.

'Kill' is a matter of opinion. I don't think abortion kills a human being. Nobody can prove that it does.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Re: What rights should a fetus have?

If it's against the law (or as some say 'murder') to have an abortion, should all miscarriages be subject to law enforcement inquiry?

If the mother was known to be pregnant (or perhaps missed her period by a few weeks or more) but never delivered, should a missing persons report be filed? The mother could answer some questions at the station, and even take a polygraph. The fetus would be human with full rights. Can't assume it was all spontaneous.

I have raised the same issue before. If pro lifers are so concerned about the fetus (which I don’t think they are, to them, banning abortion is just another way of oppressing women), they should demand that every miscarriage be thoroughly investigated to see if women, doctor, nursing staff etc. was in any way responsible and charges should be filed against those who were responsible.

They should demand that miscarried fetus should be given proper funeral, burial service, with a proper casket and everything. Are they demanding that such a law be passed? No. Or forget about the law, do pro lifers do this voluntarily for any miscarriage pro life women may have? Do they take the miscarried fetus to a funeral home? Again, no.

Nowhere is the pro life hypocrisy so evidence as in the issue of miscarriage.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Re: What rights should a fetus have?

So it's just an uncontrollable and unpreventable overwhelming desire that gets tyou in the situation but because a woman can choose it's okay?

In a perfect world then a guy can say raping a woman was an uncontrollable and unpreventable overwhelming desire and is okay because she can choose to kill it if she wants if she has an uncontrollable and unpreventable overwhelming desire?

There is a big difference between the two. In the second case (rape), the victim is a human being, in the first case (abortion), it is not (or properly speaking, there is no victim in the first case, since no human is harmed).
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Re: What rights should a fetus have?

But then those who had a clue realized a fetus doesn't have the same rights to the mother's body as she does. Obviously some still don't get it, so have at er there genius.

Quite so. If the law did not penalize anybody for miscarriage (when abortion was illegal), then the law was an ass. Fetus was treated as a human being when it was aborted, but not as one when it was miscarried. It was an unjust, hypocritical law, and Supreme Court was well advised to scrap it.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Re: What rights should a fetus have?

If "I couldn't control myself" isn't lawful excuse for rape what makes you think lack of control getting, laid and not considering the outcome makes it okay to kill?

It is not OK to kill, abortion does not kill any human being.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Re: morning after pill

Actually, I've met many pro lifers who have no problem with the morning after pill. The pro life movement is as flexible as any other movement - they have their hard liners and they have their moderates.

Do you mean pro lifers here in Canada? I think they are a slightly different breed from pro lifers in USA, who tend to be much more extreme. You only have to look at the history of morning after pill in USA, to see how much opposition there was by the pro life movement there.

Indeed, that is why pro lifers in USA are also opposed to some forms of contraception, the ones which kill the embryo or prevent it from implanting. Pro lifers call them abortifacients, to differentiate them from contraceptives (which don’t kill the embryo).
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Re: morning after pill

just about every animal will abort when the food supply is compromised or the area is otherwise unable to support the present population. They instinctively know which plants to eat. Aboriginal peoples also know what plants will induce abortion. If you are concerned about using pharmaceutical chemicals that you suspect might has adverse long term effects, seek counsel with an aboriginal elder in your area. They might know of a plant in your area that has been used for thousands of years by their people.

Many of these things that conservatives oppose (abortion, homosexuality, prostitution etc., even premarital sex) have been around for thousands of years, indeed probably as long as humanity has been around.

When conservatives try to ban these things, they are trying to impose their version of Bible upon everybody, and thereby going against nature. No wonder they don’t have much success at it.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
Re: morning after pill

Actually, I've met many pro lifers who have no problem with the morning after pill. The pro life movement is as flexible as any other movement - they have their hard liners and they have their moderates.
Same with left-wingers, ....You have the regular liberals.... then you have the progressives;-)
 

Curiosity

Senate Member
Jul 30, 2005
7,326
138
63
California
Re: morning after pill

Well to be honest - I really dislike argument but if we all agreed without question and followed the "new rules" without argument or debate we'd turn into sheepish droids questioning nothing.

Thank god for debate and discussion and differing opinions - signs of a great and healthy society - who have every right to agree/disagree/ and yes - compromise!
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
70
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Re: morning after pill

Pro lifers don’t accept the morning after pill, in their eyes, morning after pill is same as getting an abortion.
Only an arrogant fool would presume to know what pro-lifers accept or not.

The logic goes something like this; human life begins at conception, it is a baby at conception. So anything that prevents implanting of embryo also kills the baby. Hence pro lifer opposition to morning after pill.
Wrong, as usual. The logic actually goes like this: life begins at conception, and as the life can be nothing other than human (from human parents, it must be a human life inside the mother.
And don't bring in the religious crap about pro-lifers; there are also atheist pro-lifers. What you call pro-lifers, and what pro-lifers I've seen are two different things.

Indeed, it was a huge battle to get it legalized in USA, it was as difficult to get morning after pill legalized as it was to get the abortion pill legalized.
Perhaps you should go to the states and whine about it then.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
70
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Re: morning after pill

Another solution would be a foolproof accurate way.....

....Of being able to diagnose our own fertility days with more accuracy than is offered by the scientific community at the present time.

This doesn't prevent rape however or molestation, but in most cases a woman can
avoid sexual activity during the important cycle without having to ingest any chemicals.
Sex by the numbers? Curio, you're a funny girl. ;)