What if the baby wants to be aborted?
I'd like to think so too. We were just discussing the statistics and what they might imply, I don't think any value judgment was expressed or implied. I seriously doubt that the justices who struck down the abortion laws were thinking in terms of culling the disadvantaged, it appears to be, assuming the conclusion is correct, an unintended consequence that comes clear only in hindsight.I guess I'd like to think humanity is above being pleased at, or pondering the benefit of, culling the poor or uneducated rather than trying to find ways to alleviate the plight of the future generation, but we obviously aren't.
As I've said before, what about the actions of the male? He gave away his rights when he shot his wad. If he kept his pants on there wouldn't be an abortion 100% of the time.I know...... inconveniencing a woman for 9 months is FAR worse than killing the baby.
How dare anyone think that a woman should take responsibility for her actions.
Dr. Henry Morgentaler C.M., a Member of the Order of Canada, is neither a ‘saint’ nor a ‘criminal’.
While there are millions of Canadians who likely despise Dr. Morgentaler for the fact that he was a driving force behind safe access to abortion, the fact is that without Dr. Morgentaler’s work, we would have rampant back-alley and coat hanger abortions; thousands of women every year would place themselves in grave danger to access abortion. He has been an influential Canadian in the driving for the enhancement of women’s rights.
I suppose.
I guess I'd like to think humanity is above being pleased at, or pondering the benefit of, culling the poor or uneducated rather than trying to find ways to alleviate the plight of the future generation, but we obviously aren't.
I'd rather call somebody a ****ty mom or dad than call them a killer. There is no shortage of help for mothers in the community no matter how old or how buzzed on crack and babies can overcome damn near anything even coming off crack after being born. It's far better to take the risk than it is to kill and potentially lose an Einstein.
If it's against the law (or as some say 'murder') to have an abortion, should all miscarriages be subject to law enforcement inquiry?
If the mother was known to be pregnant (or perhaps missed her period by a few weeks or more) but never delivered, should a missing persons report be filed? The mother could answer some questions at the station, and even take a polygraph. The fetus would be human with full rights. Can't assume it was all spontaneous.
So it's just an uncontrollable and unpreventable overwhelming desire that gets tyou in the situation but because a woman can choose it's okay?
In a perfect world then a guy can say raping a woman was an uncontrollable and unpreventable overwhelming desire and is okay because she can choose to kill it if she wants if she has an uncontrollable and unpreventable overwhelming desire?
But then those who had a clue realized a fetus doesn't have the same rights to the mother's body as she does. Obviously some still don't get it, so have at er there genius.
If "I couldn't control myself" isn't lawful excuse for rape what makes you think lack of control getting, laid and not considering the outcome makes it okay to kill?
What if the baby wants to be aborted?
Actually, I've met many pro lifers who have no problem with the morning after pill. The pro life movement is as flexible as any other movement - they have their hard liners and they have their moderates.
just about every animal will abort when the food supply is compromised or the area is otherwise unable to support the present population. They instinctively know which plants to eat. Aboriginal peoples also know what plants will induce abortion. If you are concerned about using pharmaceutical chemicals that you suspect might has adverse long term effects, seek counsel with an aboriginal elder in your area. They might know of a plant in your area that has been used for thousands of years by their people.
Same with left-wingers, ....You have the regular liberals.... then you have the progressives;-)Actually, I've met many pro lifers who have no problem with the morning after pill. The pro life movement is as flexible as any other movement - they have their hard liners and they have their moderates.
Only an arrogant fool would presume to know what pro-lifers accept or not.Pro lifers don’t accept the morning after pill, in their eyes, morning after pill is same as getting an abortion.
Wrong, as usual. The logic actually goes like this: life begins at conception, and as the life can be nothing other than human (from human parents, it must be a human life inside the mother.The logic goes something like this; human life begins at conception, it is a baby at conception. So anything that prevents implanting of embryo also kills the baby. Hence pro lifer opposition to morning after pill.
Perhaps you should go to the states and whine about it then.Indeed, it was a huge battle to get it legalized in USA, it was as difficult to get morning after pill legalized as it was to get the abortion pill legalized.
Sex by the numbers? Curio, you're a funny girl.Another solution would be a foolproof accurate way.....
....Of being able to diagnose our own fertility days with more accuracy than is offered by the scientific community at the present time.
This doesn't prevent rape however or molestation, but in most cases a woman can
avoid sexual activity during the important cycle without having to ingest any chemicals.
rofl You and logic in the same sentence? Oxymoron.I personally agree with you, I am pro choice. i was simply explaining the pro life logic (such as it is).