9/11 Conspiracy Theories Debunked - Video

EagleSmack

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
MHz said:
Can't argue with that math. Yet the simulation I posted that was put together with skills that are above mine or yours and it was a crash analysis software program rather that an artistic program, little points that that just seem to bounce off you, for one example. That isn't a real big deal to me until your view is classified as the 'intelligent' and my side of the coin is classified as a little beneath you. My background doesn't make me any more qualified to be more than a reader of stuff that interests you. The only proof I can offer as to my mechanical aptitude, in a test I took at a college my score was 99/99 and at that time it was the top score and I have been around mechanical things all my life. You mention right off the bat things, if you want to topple a building you take out a structural member, in the case of a tower you take out a corner at a low floor number that still allows for a whiplash effect at the top, and they would have went over sideways taking out even more buildings

Les would know that from his days on a cat in the bush. Smack a tree that is too big to knock down and the top 20 ft or so can snap off just by that (and the cold weather)


In your pictures the color was coming from the material while it was under heating, the stuff running off the building would be similar to what color it retains after being taken away from the heat, glass becomes clear but taffy-like, most plastics have flames when in a molten state. In the building and your photo's the last one is the one I would choose as being most similar. The photo has some damage to the exterior and it would indicate the damage from the larger portions of the plane would have made most of the floors sag towards the portions destroyed by the plane. That would mean the molten material came from the left of where it was pouring out. That leaves the corner and earlier footage should show a 'raging fire' in the corner itself prior to it being out and only white smoke being visible. The temperature of those flames should also be able to be color coded against known examples.


You just discard the links anyway and my background that I just gave is enough to make me pursue some avenue of investigation that somebody closer to the issue has already gone down.
Click to expand...

Give us your version of events then.
 
A

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
MHz said:
Can't argue with that math. Yet the simulation I posted that was put together with skills that are above mine or yours and it was a crash analysis software program rather that an artistic program, little points that that just seem to bounce off you, for one example. That isn't a real big deal to me until your view is classified as the 'intelligent' and my side of the coin is classified as a little beneath you. My background doesn't make me any more qualified to be more than a reader of stuff that interests you. The only proof I can offer as to my mechanical aptitude, in a test I took at a college my score was 99/99 and at that time it was the top score and I have been around mechanical things all my life. You mention right off the bat things, if you want to topple a building you take out a structural member, in the case of a tower you take out a corner at a low floor number that still allows for a whiplash effect at the top, and they would have went over sideways taking out even more buildings
Click to expand...
Invariably 100% of the time?

Les would know that from his days on a cat in the bush. Smack a tree that is too big to knock down and the top 20 ft or so can snap off just by that (and the cold weather)
Click to expand...
Yep, I forgot about those great big office towers called trees.


In your pictures the color was coming from the material while it was under heating,
Click to expand...
Excuse me? It seems to me people quit heating stuff after it's reached the molten state and they start pouring.
Try another stab at a reply. That one flunked.
the stuff running off the building would be similar to what color it retains after being taken away from the heat, glass becomes clear but taffy-like, most plastics have flames when in a molten state. In the building and your photo's the last one is the one I would choose as being most similar.
Click to expand...
None were of molten steel. It was a trick question designed to show that color varies with heat in more than just steel and a lot of substances are similarly colored as steel when molten.
The photo has some damage to the exterior and it would indicate the damage from the larger portions of the plane would have made most of the floors sag towards the portions destroyed by the plane. That would mean the molten material came from the left of where it was pouring out. That leaves the corner and earlier footage should show a 'raging fire' in the corner itself prior to it being out and only white smoke being visible. The temperature of those flames should also be able to be color coded against known examples.
Click to expand...
.........


You just discard the links anyway and my background that I just gave is enough to make me pursue some avenue of investigation that somebody closer to the issue has already gone down.
Click to expand...
I'm supposed to keep the links after I read them? Oooooohhhh. Well, wait, I'll find room in a drawer here to put them in.
 
MHz

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
EagleSmack said:
I mean anyone who says this is a conspiracy.

I saw it. And?

So what exactly happened?

So what happened then?

What crashed there? Where did the plane go if it didn't crash there?
Click to expand...
Ah, what % of your Nation is that these days? or does FOXCBSABCMSNBC not publish that anymore after the scales tipped?
Mechanically accurate or not, just like the I asked? doh.
Same as what always happens when steel meets meets aluminum.
Govermnement contract, you tell me it should have been stronger than that though. Did the renovations continue to the rest of the Pentegram or did they just repair the damaged section and not bother with upgrading the other 4 sides as they fail. From the simulation of that place the walls of the ring made it stronger than the core of the towers.
 
CDNBear

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
MHz said:
From the simulation of that place the walls of the ring made it stronger than the core of the towers.
Click to expand...
If you're talking about the rings of the Pentagon, they are stronger then the WTC.

They're actually stronger then most buildings in the US.

And here's a news flash mhz. It's not just a simple office building, it's a military installation. It's actually classified as a Fort.

I mean, I fully understand how you might over look such an important detail, while trying to rationalize the whole thing.

This must be troubling to you.
 
MHz

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
EagleSmack said:
Give us your version of events then.
Click to expand...
Don't you mean to do a long post about why your fellow country men are so deluded that you cannot make then swallow your supported version of the truth? Subversion can be an internal or external threat to your Nation right?

Another cup of tea?
 
CDNBear

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
MHz said:
Don't you mean to do a long post about why your fellow country men are so deluded that you cannot make then swallow your supported version of the truth? Subversion can be an internal or external threat to your Nation right?

Another cup of tea?
Click to expand...
Dancing around answering another question, without answering it...?

 
CDNBear

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
MHz said:
The relatives of the ones who died that day deserve a refund then.
Click to expand...


If you're going to dance around the truth, can you throw on some tap shoes, I haven't seen a good tap dance in a while.

Or perhaps you know something about the construction of the Pentagon that I don't. Care to share?
 
CDNBear

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
MHz said:
See any question mark in his post?
Click to expand...
I see a question, and since you oft leave them out, in fact even defended the fact that you leave them out by accident. I think it's highly hypocritical you change positions on them now...

Tsk tsk...

How about all the question's I've asked that you refuse to answer?
 
EagleSmack

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
MHz said:
Don't you mean to do a long post about why your fellow country men are so deluded that you cannot make then swallow your supported version of the truth? Subversion can be an internal or external threat to your Nation right?

Another cup of tea?
Click to expand...

I didnt expect even this much.
 
A

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
EagleSmack said:
Oh my mistake.

Give us your version of events then?
Click to expand...
She did.

AnnaG said:
Electrolysis? Crunch? That's it? That's your entire 9/11 hypothesis?
Click to expand...

MHz said:
Ah, what % of your Nation is that these days? or does FOXCBSABCMSNBC not publish that anymore after the scales tipped?
Mechanically accurate or not, just like the I asked? doh.
Same as what always happens when steel meets meets aluminum.
Govermnement contract, you tell me it should have been stronger than that though. Did the renovations continue to the rest of the Pentegram or did they just repair the damaged section and not bother with upgrading the other 4 sides as they fail. From the simulation of that place the walls of the ring made it stronger than the core of the towers.
Click to expand...
 
CDNBear

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
MHz said:
Did you go and read article #55? Watch a vid while you do.
Click to expand...
Yes, I've actually read the entire Geneva Convention, which is why I can argue it with boobs that just parrot what somebody else tells them it says.

Now, how does that chart relate to the downing of the WTC?

What is the chart saying?

What do you think it proves?

And what was NIST's purpose for submitting that test to UL?

Please feel free to actually answer each question directly mhz.
 
MHz

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
EagleSmack said:
Oh my mistake.

Give us your version of events then?
Click to expand...
NP it took me a few minutes to find the right vid.
Watch the vid just above your post. I've already gone over this with you at least once. If you prefer to believe 19 foreigners who live in caves can defeat the whole of the US forces and bring the country to a standstill for a few days (wall street got lots of immediate protection BTW) then you will be really fuked if/when a real power attacks. lol You guys can't even beat Iraq after 10 years of making sure they had nothing to fight back with, no use even mentioneing much about Afghanistan where the kill ratio to fighters to civilians os probably 10,000 women and kids to every actual fighter encountered, nbo the push is on to get the Taliban to become involved in helping the US bring stability.

How the mighty have fallen, then once you look at the real history of military intervention by the US it's quite clear the 'mighty' is mighty only when picking on a weak opponent.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom