Woods' wife used golf club to free him from SUV

Kreskin

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
SirJosephPorter said:
Perhaps not, but marriage is a contract, and it can be what two consenting adults want it to be.
Click to expand...

But I don't think the courts would view a marriage contract as equitable if it involves "if you keep your mouth shut you get paid and if you speak out you don't". I seriously doubt it.
 
Kreskin

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
talloola said:
The thing is that 'hardly' and of the journalists or other media knew anything
much about tiger at all, only a handful were allowed interviews, and even then
they were given a small block of time, and only allowed to talk about golf.
Majority of journalists who showed up at tournaments just because he was there,
never ever managed an interview at all, and didn't even see him 'other' than on
the course.
He never talked to any journalist about his personal life, or anything else, other
than golf. Interesting story in todays vancouver sun talking about that aspect
of his life, written by a journalist who 'did' have a little closer relationship
with Tiger, and still did not know anything about his private life. He said the
only thing he ever found out about Tiger, other than golf related, was that 'he'
is an independent.
He had strict rules about interviews, and never did anything for 'free'.
He flew by private jet, and when driving 'he' drove himself.
Even with all that privacy, when behaving such as he did, somewhere along the way,
it will kick you in the butt, as it has.
If he and his wife had an agreement for an open marriage, this problem would not
have come about, as she would have been aware of his lifestyle, obviously she was
just as much in the dark as the rest of us.
Click to expand...
Talloola, the interesting thing is Tiger fired his caddie about 4 or 5 years ago (the one that is now Furyk's caddie) because of a breach of confidentiality.
 
talloola

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
Kreskin said:
Talloola, the interesting thing is Tiger fired his caddie about 4 or 5 years ago (the one that is now Furyk's caddie) because of a breach of confidentiality.
Click to expand...

oh, you mean 'fluff', the bearded one, didn't know why he left, I just thought it
was because tiger had risen up in the ranks, and wanted someone who was more
knowledgeable, and I assume his caddie now, probably knows a little about tiger's
off course antics, but why would he ever say anything, he gets a huge paycheque
from tigers winnings.
 
Kreskin

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
talloola said:
oh, you mean 'fluff', the bearded one, didn't know why he left, I just thought it
was because tiger had risen up in the ranks, and wanted someone who was more
knowledgeable, and I assume his caddie now, probably knows a little about tiger's
off course antics, but why would he ever say anything, he gets a huge paycheque
from tigers winnings.
Click to expand...

I just mentioned that because it puts in another piece of the puzzle. It had nothing to do with performance and everything to do with talking too much about Tiger away from the course. He probably got his million dollar cheque and sworn secrecy deal on the way out, and he's probably itching to say something right now. The new guy was probably told the expectations from the start.
 
karrie

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
talloola said:
For the past four years she has either been pregnant or nurturing a new born,
then pregnant again before the first one was two, then nurturing a newborn,
can't really figure out where she has time to be running around on him.
The marriage isn't much older than the 9 months before the first baby was born.
One of his affairs was during that nine months while she was expecting the first
child.
Click to expand...

I've seen moms have affairs while their children were young... and that's stay at home moms with husbands making less than 6 figures... I can't even fathom what a mom with access to nannies could get away with.

That's not to say she DID of course...
 
talloola

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
karrie said:
I've seen moms have affairs while their children were young... and that's stay at home moms with husbands making less than 6 figures... I can't even fathom what a mom with access to nannies could get away with.

That's not to say she DID of course...
Click to expand...

of course !!!!!

I am of the same thoughts concerning her, as I was with
Tiger, until there was proof, which was verified by Tiger. There hasn't even been
a hint anything of that nature about her, except by the guys who make fun of the
situation and try to accuse her of that behavior, just because.
 
Kreskin

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Maybe some of us have signed agreements not to say anything about our time with Elin and her extensive list of fetishes.
 
SirJosephPorter

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
talloola said:
of course !!!!!

I am of the same thoughts concerning her, as I was with
Tiger, until there was proof, which was verified by Tiger. There hasn't even been
a hint anything of that nature about her, except by the guys who make fun of the
situation and try to accuse her of that behavior, just because.
Click to expand...

It may be that she was smarter than Tiger in hiding her affairs, we don't know.
 
Francis2004

Francis2004

Subjective Poster
Nov 18, 2008
2,846
34
48
Lower Mainland, BC
SirJosephPorter said:
It may be that she was smarter than Tiger in hiding her affairs, we don't know.
Click to expand...

I don't think so.. He has a lot more to lose and when it really comes down to it $$$ talks.. From what I have heard to date he was out and running almost as soon as he was married.. Had he really wanted to make the marriage work he would have tried hard..

I think there is a lot about this we do not know..

But then again why should I care.. Both are human..

I get the feeling this will be a big blood bath..
 
Risus

Risus

Genius
May 24, 2006
5,373
25
38
Toronto
karrie said:
I've seen moms have affairs while their children were young... and that's stay at home moms with husbands making less than 6 figures... I can't even fathom what a mom with access to nannies could get away with.

That's not to say she DID of course...
Click to expand...

Sure, blame the wife....
 
SirJosephPorter

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Francis2004 said:
I don't think so.. He has a lot more to lose and when it really comes down to it $$$ talks.. From what I have heard to date he was out and running almost as soon as he was married.. Had he really wanted to make the marriage work he would have tried hard..

I think there is a lot about this we do not know..

But then again why should I care.. Both are human..

I get the feeling this will be a big blood bath..
Click to expand...

Francis, usually it is easier for a wife to hide her affair from her husband than it is for the husband to hide it from his wife. The wife is usually into her husband’s things, she will check his clothes, his pockets to do the washing, if he is going away on a business trip, she will pack his bags etc. If she needs money for shopping she may even raid his wallet. So she is aware of what her husband is doing in an intimate manner. One careless move on the part of the husband and he will get caught.

A husband on the other hand, rarely inspects his wife’s clothes, he would rarely open her purse, look into her things etc. So the chances that he may come across a note by her (or her lover), or some object belonging to her lover are minimal.

Also, a woman is much better in picking up clues from her husband at subliminal level to know if there is something wrong, if her husband is fooling around. The so called woman’s intuition is a very powerful force. A man is usually blind to such subliminal clues.

I am not saying that it happened in this case, as somebody said, there is no evidence that she was fooling around. But that doesn’t necessarily mean that she wasn’t fooling around, just that there is no evidence for it (and she of course, must be given the benefit of doubt).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom