lol Then why ARE you going?I'm not going because of the knives.
lol Then why ARE you going?I'm not going because of the knives.
I know. I was only playing with the way you worded it.I'm not. Don't want to get stabbed.
As I said, the right to freedom of religion isn't absolute, and I'm glad you agree with me. If it was absolute, it would trump everything else. But it doesn't. Or at least, the carrying-concealed-weapons aspect of the freedom of religion isn't absolute, it's at the discretion of the government.
SJP -What door did you fall of - you are such a Knob at times - Do you know the max length of the kirpan that can be carried??I thought we were discussing violence caused by a kirpan, Goober and not knife fights in general. Are there knife fights in the bar? Sure they take place. But that is not the subject under discussion here; we are talking about violence involving a 3 inch kirpan.
As to not seeing a 3 ft kirpan, I repeat my comment. I am not aware that they will permit the Sikhs to carry 3 ft kirpan into the Olympic stadium.
Well, I won't be going to the Olympics anyways, so I don't give a ratsbutt if they carry kirpans or not...
SJP -What door did you fall of - you are such a Knob at times - Do you know the max length of the kirpan that can be carried??
SJP The question should be did you bother to read the Article - The Sikh must be Baptized -All 5 symbols must be worn of which the Kirpan is one of the 5 - and that the Kirpan must not be easily accessible - Did I get it right Boss? Again - I ask which door did you fall off?Did you bother to read the original article, Goober? It says the kirpan may be a maximum of 7.5 inches long, with the blade no more than 4 inches. Where does a 3 ft kirpan come in?
SJP The question should be did you bother to read the Article - The Sikh must be Baptized -All 5 symbols must be worn of which the Kirpan is one of the 5 - and that the Kirpan must not be easily accessible - Did I get it right Boss? Again - I ask which door did you fall off?
SJP - I gave the description of how the length varies - that was all - You went sarcastic.But again, you referred to a 3 ft kirpan a few times. Where does the 3 ft kirpan come in?
So yes, the number of potential fatalities (along with the consideration that there has not been a single incidence involving kirpan) is very much the deciding factor.
I suppose if any right could be considered absolute it is the right to life.
So how many people have been attacked on a plane by a pair of nail clippers?
But again, you referred to a 3 ft kirpan a few times. Where does the 3 ft kirpan come in?
If you look at it that way, no right is absolute, TenPenny, not even the right to free speech. You don’t have the right to yell ‘fire’ in a crowded theater.
I suppose if any right could be considered absolute it is the right to life. Other than that, I think all the rights are subject to reasonable restrictions.
Or by shampoo?
They are a sizable voting bloc -Aha. Now you're starting to understand the idea of 'absolute' rights, and the silliness of using that word when you don't mean it.
So you've agreed that freedom of religion doesn't trump public safety, except at the Olympics, apparently.
So what makes the Olympics sacred to Sikhs?
Did you bother to read the original article, Goober? It says the kirpan may be a maximum of 7.5 inches long, with the blade no more than 4 inches. Where does a 3 ft kirpan come in?
SJP - Your postPost 362If that happens, that will be the end of Sikhs being permitted to carry kirpan in a public place. And that is why I don’t see it happening.