Gaytown In The Big Smoke Is Dying

[taxslave]

What makes the key to your arse the one that winds the world? Why are they such a threat to you?

He is afraid to face the truth about his latent homosexual desires.
So far as I can tell the only people,( and I use the term loosely)that are homophobic are afraid or unsure of their own sexuality.
I am always amazed at the amount of church goers that are homophobic when there is a good chance that their preacher is either homosexual or pedophile.

 

[pgs]

8O No-one explained the birds & the birds, or the bees & the bees yet? Are you old enough to be in here, sonny?

I believe i have more grey hair than you.(missy)
Now please explain how a lesbion couple or two gay guys have children.
Are they gays or lesbions of convienience?
btw I was not the one who stated they were moving to the subarbs to raise children.

 

[lone wolf]

Turkey baster? Adoption?

NOTE: The latter is the logical choice for guys

 

[SirJosephPorter]

I believe i have more grey hair than you.(missy)
Now please explain how a lesbion couple or two gay guys have children.
Are they gays or lesbions of convienience?
btw I was not the one who stated they were moving to the subarbs to raise children.

I suggest you Google for the following concepts, with which you evidently seem to be unfamiliar.

Artificial insemination.

Adoption

Divorce (a lesbian may get the custody of her kid after the divorce).

Surrogate motherhood.

 

[AnnaG]

I believe i have more grey hair than you.(missy)
Now please explain how a lesbion couple or two gay guys have children.
Are they gays or lesbions of convienience?
btw I was not the one who stated they were moving to the subarbs to raise children.

I'm glad you have some hair, mister.
You've never heard of invitro fertilization, adoption, etc.?
Convenience? lmao Show me a pair of heteros who would find being gay a convenience.
I don't care where people move to.

 

[pgs]

It still takes to to tango.
Artificial insemination is fine for lesbians but not gays,and they still need a male donor.
Adoption is a possibility but how many?
Divorce again gay or lesbion by convinience.
Surogate motherhood again good only for lesbions and again they need a male donor.
So how many gay and lesbion couples are moving to the suburbs to raise there children?

 

[gerryh]

There are a fair number of "hetro's" that require donors,invitro, surogate, and adoption.

 

[pgs]

I'm glad you have some hair, mister.
You've never heard of invitro fertilization, adoption, etc.?
Convenience? lmao Show me a pair of heteros who would find being gay a convenience.
I don't care where people move to.

Why the anger.cool down ,I am neither illiterate nor stupid.
I know of all those things however that is not the natural order of life.
Gays and or lesbians living a natural existence together can not procreate
unless one happens to be a hermaphidite.
How many of those are there?
But of course I am just a biggoted homophobe and as such should not comment on any issues,And the fact that I was not being predudicial in any way just slipped right by you.Carry on you are the bastion of all that is good in this world.

 

[gerryh]

Why the anger.cool down ,I am neither illiterate nor stupid.
I know of all those things however that is not the natural order of life.
Gays and or lesbians living a natural existence together can not procreate
unless one happens to be a hermaphidite.
How many of those are there?
But of course I am just a biggoted homophobe and as such should not comment on any issues,And the fact that I was not being predudicial in any way just slipped right by you.Carry on you are the bastion of all that is good in this world.

So, do you also discount those hetro couples who can not "pro-create" the "natural" way?

 

[AnnaG]

It still takes to to tango.

Well, your original question indicated that you couldn't figure out how people get kids. Specifically gay people. And people supplied the answer to your question.

Artificial insemination is fine for lesbians but not gays,and they still need a male donor.

So? It won't be long before there are synthetic sperm on the market. (BTW, lesbians are gays).

Adoption is a possibility but how many?

I suppose they can adopt as many as they think they can raise.

Divorce again gay or lesbion by convinience.

I don't understand what you said.

Surogate motherhood again good only for lesbions and again they need a male donor.

So? It won't be long before there are synthetic sperm on the market.

So how many gay and lesbion couples are moving to the suburbs to raise there children?

I have no idea.

 

[AnnaG]

Why the anger.cool down ,I am neither illiterate nor stupid.

What anger?

I know of all those things however that is not the natural order of life.

Neither is getting light from a light bulb.

Gays and or lesbians living a natural existence together can not procreate
unless one happens to be a hermaphidite.

So? Reproducing isn't the only function of humans.

How many of those are there?

I have no idea how many hermaphrodites there are.

But of course I am just a biggoted homophobe and as such should not comment on any issues,And the fact that I was not being predudicial in any way just slipped right by you.Carry on you are the bastion of all that is good in this world.

If you say so.

 

[Risus]

Why the anger.cool down ,I am neither illiterate nor stupid.
I know of all those things however that is not the natural order of life.
Gays and or lesbians living a natural existence together can not procreate
unless one happens to be a hermaphidite.
How many of those are there?
But of course I am just a biggoted homophobe and as such should not comment on any issues,And the fact that I was not being predudicial in any way just slipped right by you.Carry on you are the bastion of all that is good in this world.

a biggoted homophobe is on the right side of this debate..

 

[AnnaG]

a biggoted homophobe is on the right side of this debate..

..... as opposed to the left side.

 

[Risus]

..... as opposed to the left side.

as opposed to the wrong side...

 

[coldstream]

Really? I believe the Greek civilization lasted for a long time.

This shows how shallow the study of history has become. Ancient Greece existed as a group of city states, sharing the same language and wider geographical location, not as a unified nation state.

Homosexuality in Greece was known to exist in legitimate forms in two cities. In Athens pedophilia between men and boys was legitimated only in the aristocracy, for brief periods, and was widely condemned by the Athenian Republic which developed under Solon.

In Sparta, obligatory homosexuality was part of the military culture. Under Lycergus Sparta developed into a classic dictatorship and slave society, the reincarnation of which you can see to this day.

Ultimately it fell to Athens, the first democracy.. better stated, it fell to pieces because of its own lack of moral integrity.

Look at the occult, homosexual and dictatorial origins of the Nazis. Those were not freak cooincidences. They were blood brothers, throughout history, dialectical and competitive opposites.. for the destiny of the world.

 

[AnnaG]

as opposed to the wrong side...

lol You wish.

 

[AnnaG]

This shows how shallow the study of history has become. Ancient Greece existed as a group of city states, sharing the same language and wider geographical location, not as a unified nation state.

Homosexuality in Greece was known to exist in legitimate forms in two cities. In Athens pedophilia between men and boys was legitimated only in the aristocracy, for brief periods, and was widely condemned by the Athenian Republic which developed under Solon.

In Sparta, obligatory homosexuality was part of the military culture. Under Lycergus Sparta developed into a classic dictatorship and slave society, the reincarnation of which you can see to this day.

Ultimately it fell to Athens, the first democracy.. better stated, it fell to pieces because of its own lack of moral integrity.

Look at the occult, homosexual and dictatorial origins of the Nazis. Those were not freak cooincidences. They were blood brothers, throughout history, dialectical and competitive opposites.. for the destiny of the world.

So if humans were perfect, nothing they build would fail. But we are humans and that INCLUDES gays, so whatever we build eventually fails. Big deal. Nothing in the universe is constant except constants in math and the like.
Iran puts gays to death and look what a delightful society that is. And they are even more nuts about their religion than you are about yours.

 

[coldstream]

So if humans were perfect, nothing they build would fail. But we are humans and that INCLUDES gays, so whatever we build eventually fails. Big deal. Nothing in the universe is constant except constants in math and the like.
Iran puts gays to death and look what a delightful society that is. And they are even more nuts about their religion than you are about yours.

There are lesson from history of things that endure and things that fail to do so. Everything is built in conformance with fundamental moral archetypes. Those can be from good or evil. NO one was born a homosexual. The only way to define a homosexual is by the activity he participates in, that being futile gratification, in contravention of natural law and divine intent.

Anyone who looks at Muslim society, in its relationship with God, realizes that it is fundamentally the antithesis of what is proposed by Christianity. These are not vague differences in a homogenous monotheistic theology, they really are polar opposites in terms of their moral axioms.

True Christianity does not execute homosexuals, despite what might have occurred under its name in the past. You can go to the Vatican web site and search for the document of Pastoral Care of Homosexuals, which is much different from blood and vengeance called for the Koran.

 

[Risus]

lol You wish.

I don't wish, I know.

 

[AnnaG]

There are lesson from history of things that endure and things that fail to do so. Everything is in built concert with fundamental moral archetypes. Those can be from good or evil. NO one was born a homosexual.

That's an opinion, not a fact.

The only way to define a homosexual is by the activity he participates in, that being futile gratification, in contravention of natural law and divine intent.

That's also an opinion.

Anyone who looks at Muslim society, in its relationship with God, realizes that it is fundamentally the antithesis of what is proposed by Christianity. These are not vague differences in a homogenous monotheistic theology, they really are polar opposites in terms of their moral axioms.

Who cares? Neither one has much validity when it comes to the bottom line.

True Christianity does not execute homosexuals, despite what might have occurred under its name in the past. You can go to the Vatican web site and search for the document of Pastoral Care of Homosexuals, which is much different from blood and vengeance called for the Koran.

That's for sure. But intolerance is intolerance and humans are supposed to love each other regardless of what characteristics they have. I seem to remember something about judgement being the choice of the gods, not humans.