SirJosephPorter, your post #739 suggests that the only people who (in reference to my post) haven't paid taxes in the last year, haven't got a high school diploma or can not name their representatives are African-Americans.
I NEVER said any such thing. My three conditions for voting eligibility are TOTALLY race-neutral.
Sure you didn’t, YJ. But your intent was obvious. When you tailor the requirements in such a way as to get rid of Obama voters (you said so yourself, that your requirements will get rid of 80% of Obama voters), your intent is obvious.
Sure your conditions are totally race neutral, like the conditions for voter registration in Southern USA were race neutral (before Voting Registration Act made it easy for blacks to vote). Your conditions are meant to keep blacks out, nothing more.
And as for the rest of your post: would you not prefer a burly six-foot-four male who drags your carcass out of a burning building to a four-foot-two female wimp promoted by affirmative action?
And just where is a four foot two female hired as a fire fighter? And suppose a state passes a law that all the state employees must be at least six feet tall. That will keep most women out, without specifically discriminating based upon gender. As I said, that is the oldest trick in the book.
holds a few surprises for you and your ilk, in the not so distant future: Sarah Palin.
Yes, yes, we all know Joan of Arc is going to win the biggest victory ever in 2012, that is old news. Tell me, YJ do you think Democrats will win any seats at all in the House and Senate in 2012? Or do you see a total wipe out by the Republicans?
