Is a fetus a Human being?

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Quoting SirJosephPorter And why should he do that? The burden of proof is upon those who claim that fetus is a human being. Currently accepted view is that it is not a human being, that is why abortion is legal in most countries in the world.​

If you want to change the status quo, it is up to you to prove your case. You go ahead and prove that fetus is a human being. You haven’t done that, several of you have been making that argument here, but I doubt if you have convinced anybody (certainly you haven’t convinced me).​


So taxslave doesn’t have to do anything, those who claim that fetus is a human being since conception, they have to prove their case, convince the scientific community, who will then transmit their findings to us mortals (in the form of briefing, press release by AMA, CMA, GMC, articles in JAMA, Nature etc.). Then I will be convinced (and I suspect so will most people).​



The opening message proves the fetus is human, where is it you find that a human fetus is not human? Just show me, I'm not locked in the post I made.

I saw that.
Perhaps the currently accepted view is that a fetus isn't a human, but I still defy anyone to show us where the appropriate science supports that view (IOW, most people are ignorant of the facts).

There is LOADS of scientific evidence pointing to fetuses being human. I just reasearched it. Couldn't find anything by any scientist involved in biology that said different. They quibble about at what point a zygote becomes human or at what stage an embryo becomes human but none I found mention anything about a living thing poofing into a human at birth.

BTW, Sir Joe Pompous, I did include a pdf fromthe AMA/JAMA that indicated their position. So you didn't even bother to read very much of my research. Not that you'd recognize evidence anyway.
 
Last edited:

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
That's as far as I'm taking it. Now if someone wants they can argue rights, or what ever they want. It is a legal, religious issue, not a biological issue.

Ironsides, it is a legal, religious, medical and biological issue. And unless and until scientists tell us that it is a human being, average person wont’ be convinced.

At least not here in Canada, I don’t know about USA. Influence of religious Fundamentalism is strong in USA (After all, Fundamentalists made you guys to bring in prohibition). So Fundamentalists may well be able to ram through a ban on all abortions in USA, I don’t know.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Even that is a stretch.

Is a human being a fetus?

But of course it is, Kreskin. Didn’t you know the prolife motto? Life begins at conception and ends at birth.

Because the same crowd that sheds crocodile tears over destroying of a fetus (0which according to them is same as a human being like you or I), the same crowd is also opposedto welfare, any help for single mothers (they think all the welfare should be left to the Church), giving the single mother any advice about contraception (no sex before marriage), helping her with education (a woman's place is in the home and she should find a man to marry) etc.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
But of course it is, Kreskin. Didn’t you know the prolife motto? Life begins at conception and ends at birth.

Because the same crowd that sheds crocodile tears over destroying of a fetus (0which according to them is same as a human being like you or I), the same crowd is also opposed welfare, any help for single mothers (they think all the welfare should be left to the Church), giving the single mother any advice about contraception (no sex before marriage), helping her with education (a woman's place is in the home and she should find a man to marry) etc.


I know this moron can't see what I write, but this has got to be one of the stupidest things he has written yet.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
But of course it is, Kreskin. Didn’t you know the prolife motto? Life begins at conception and ends at birth.

Because the same crowd that sheds crocodile tears over destroying of a fetus (0which according to them is same as a human being like you or I), the same crowd is also opposedto welfare, any help for single mothers (they think all the welfare should be left to the Church), giving the single mother any advice about contraception (no sex before marriage), helping her with education (a woman's place is in the home and she should find a man to marry) etc.

But they do support exorcism of gays and lesbians.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
But they do support exorcism of gays and lesbians.

But of course. Incidentally the same website, American College of Pediatricians, which supposedly is the ultimate authority in deciding that fetus is a human being, is viciously anti-gay, it advocates all kinds of discrimination against gays.

If prolifers have to quote extreme right wing, religious right websites such as this one, they may as well give up the argument.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
211
63
In the bush near Sudbury
But of course it is, Kreskin. Didn’t you know the prolife motto? Life begins at conception and ends at birth.

Because the same crowd that sheds crocodile tears over destroying of a fetus (0which according to them is same as a human being like you or I), the same crowd is also opposedto welfare, any help for single mothers (they think all the welfare should be left to the Church), giving the single mother any advice about contraception (no sex before marriage), helping her with education (a woman's place is in the home and she should find a man to marry) etc.

Just based on this statement, you are a complete waste of perfectly good oxygen.....
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
I know this moron can't see what I write, but this has got to be one of the stupidest things he has written yet.
It sure is loaded with stereotyping, bigotry, and assumption, that's for sure.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Isn't it amazing that such a simple concept needs to be explained to some people.
More evidence that there still are more than one coexisting branch of humans like way back when there were Neanderthal, Australopithecus, Cro Magnon, etc. wandering around. :D
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
BTW, Sir Joe Pompous, I did include a pdf fromthe AMA/JAMA that indicated their position.

I looked at your posts again and I didn’t find any link to AMA/JAMA, Anna. But I did find the following:

Although life is a continuous process, fertilization is a critical landmark because, under ordinary circumstances, a new, genetically distinct human organism is thereby formed..

That summarizes the scientific consensus very accurately. Life is a continuum, with no beginning or end. Fertilization is of course, a critical step, so is development of embryo though various stages.

Anyway, post the link again and I will take a look at it.