I'm not here to participate in mindless intellectualizations (Definition: Intellectualization is separating oneself from uncomfortable emotions by taking a pseudo-objective viewpoint.).
I assure you that those 3 examples that I shared are quite true. Funny how they get rejected because they don't fit into your rather narrow minded arguments. Truly intelligent people don't deny information that way.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that SJP, Kreskin and Cliffy are all men. The lack of respect for life and maternal instinct is evident in your rebuttals.
Until you bear the responsibility of carrying a life in your body for 9 months, feeling this life move, kick and stretch, even hiccup, I don't think you could possibly ever come close to understanding what the beginning of life is. The fact that I am a woman already gives me a upper edge on this debate simply because this is something you have to FEEL. Physically AND emotionally. And from reading all the trash that has come out of your inflated heads explains to me exactly why men were never given such a huge and special responsibility. Your mindless and endless intellectualizing on the subject simply goes to show exactly how devoid you are of what it takes to bring life into this world. And of course, I am not saying this about all men as this can be applied to some women as well and some men are fathers long before they ever lay eyes on their own children.
In the first 2 situations the people asked others what to do. This is a question that I wouldn't be able to answer for anyone but myself. BUT I have a right to think, inside of myself, whatever I want, just like all of you. I remained friends with the girl in high school. What she did, she did to herself and to the three possibilities of what could've been. This is something she had to live with.
EITHER WAY
The point of the OP is not a question of if abortion is right or wrong. If you even read the first link - which I doubt you did - you would see that it is about the gov making it their responsibility to force women to have abortions and forced sterility on women. It is talking about a planetary regime that would decide who gets to have children and who doesn't.
Yet another situation of men intellectualizing life as if others lives and the business of bringing a baby to term was their corner of the market. Surely, if you read the actual article you wouldn't be so hot to trot regarding the issues of sterilizing women against their will. At least, I hope their is enough humanity in you to see that what was being proposed by John Holdren, Obama's appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, is an absolute house of horrors that goes against every human right ever established over the past century.
Read the article lest you look like a total thread hijacking idiot!
The question is: Do you think that gov should force a woman to have an abortion against her own will? Do you think gov should impose on society a 2 child law?
