Nuts. My husband is of the opinion that religious people have the tendency to assume humans are evil until trained not to be. My sister couldn't help people enough. I love helping people. My daughters love helping people. They all were like that from day one. And we did our best to help them develop that trait further. So I think my husband is right about that tendency in religious people. Obedience does not have to be given home by some tyrant.
Some who claim to be religious are the most cruel of all, Christian history is full of abused committed by the Church, it is still happening today. What does that have to do with anything, you don't have to obey God but you do obey somebody, be it your husband or your parents. When they say no (or whatever) are they tyrants?
Lets assume for a moment that each persons view of God stays just the way it is until something actually happens, like Christ's return. Some will not live to see the end of that day, they will be resurrected some 1,000 years later. Do you think some of them will have changed their mind about who is the boss?
Take another example, the 12 tribes are said to be in blindness about Jesus being the Messiah, prophecy has only 144,000 of them being alive to witness His return, the rest are in the grave. Is He a tyrant because He turns His back on them rather than offering them protection while denying Him proper recognition? Since every last one of them are alive by the end of the first day of His return does that make Him a tyrant? The blindness was a determination caused by the temple leaders killing OT Prophets that were sent to them, how does that make Him a tyrant?
Having the power to follow through on any and all promises does not make somebody a tyrant. Tyrants offer no forgiveness, grace and mercy assure us that when all is said and done mankind is again with God. When your parents laid down rules and followed through on the consequences were they tyrants? Giving you the opportunity to make a free choice takes away any tyrant title you care to try and pin on God.
You don't have to take chastisement from Christ, but it does have consequences.
Heb:12:7:
If ye endure chastening,
God dealeth with you as with sons;
for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not?
Heb:12:8:
But if ye be without chastisement,
whereof all are partakers,
then are ye bastards,
and not sons.
Heb:12:9:
Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us,
and we gave them reverence:
shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits,
and live?
The OT has some passages that might seem to be the work of a very angry God as some places were made barren of inhabitants. Had that not happened you would have whole civilizations of people the size of Goliath roaming around in a tyrant sort of fashion, I doubt you would want that.
Not a big deal to God if a book isn't enough to convince you that He exists, several times in Ge:1 are the words "God said", the action wasn't until the words became reality.
1Co:4:20: For the kingdom of God is not in word, but in power.
Hang onto what you see as inconsistencies, like two conflicting geologies. If the two parents = two family trees is too much to grasp so be it. An answer like this to Dex just bounces off, probably the same for all atheists.