Assimilation of the Quebecois
- Thread starter LordDurham
- Start date
The majority of Kweebeck soldiers will fight for Canada. Even if they are sympathetic to the separatists, they know the battle is already lost and leaving their post to fight for Kweebeck will get them nothing but grief. It would be a different story if Kweebeck was being treated poorly but Kweebeck soldiers are not like separatists. They are smart enough to know that they have it pretty good in Canada.
I hope the fight comes sooner rather than later. We need to get this over with.
But you are NOT French. Why are you making noise for a language that is not your own? It is at best pigeon French. Can you carry on a conversation with someone from Paris? New Orleans? Ho Chi Minh City?
Please.... Feel free to leave - but do prepare for a long bitter struggle. The fight won't be with the rest of Canada. It will be within your own "nation" when you realise you have been led down a garden path to make businessmen rich.
The Cree will keep their territory - along with the James Bay Power Project, and the Mohawks will keep theirs - along with the St Lawrence Seaway. Quebec has already proven how controlling they who don't wish to be controlled works - or doesn't. Remember Oka? Picture it on a grand scale.
If their are 43% of the Quebecois who supporter Quebec Independence from Canada then these people should be deportated from the Dominion of Canada including the Province of Quebec. If these 43% of Quebecois cant stand living in Canada they are free to leave Canada either by ship or by Plane. The best destinations for these ungratefull seperatist traitors are the United States, France, Mexico, Argentina and Chile. The Soviet Union took away the citizenship of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and other such people and expelled them from the Soviet Union, Canada should do this to the Quebecois seperatists but on a massive scale.
If any Quebecois units in the Royal Canadian Armed Forces decide to fight for Quebec independence and not for Canada then they will be declared traitors who deserve death at the fireing squard at the hands of the Royal Canadian Armed Forces and Royal Canadian Mounted Police. These Soldiers gave their oath to defend the Dominion of Canada and not to defend the intrests of the slimy frog traitors who are ungratefull to Canada for the rights and freedoms that the British and later Canada gave them. Treat Quebecois seperatists and their supporters like the vermin they are and that is with contempt.
Assimiliation of the Quebecois is the best option for Canada and Quebec. With the Quebecois assimiliating and Anglicised there would be no more trouble in both the Dominion of Canada and the Province "Not a Nation" of Quebec. With both the Province of Quebec and Dominion of Canada having 1 Language (English) life would be so much easier. If France could Frenchify the majority of the Germans in Alsace Lorraine and transform them from German Speakers into French Speakers, the so could Canada could Anglicise the majority of the Quebecois in Quebec and transform them from French Speakers into English Speakers. The key is to learn from the French and follow their methods in how to do this. If the Quebecois complain then tought luck, they are the reason why this should happen. The British and later Canada were wrong to save and protect the French Language when they should have destroyed it, the tollerance of the British and Canada have caused the problems that Canada and Quebec suffer to this very day, this can be rectified by Draconian Laws created by Canada on the Quebecois and shaming them into abandoning their Language (French) and adopting our Language (English).
Language Policy in France
Language policy in France - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
" For the linguistic unity of France, the Breton Language must disapear"
Anatole de Monzie
Public Education Minister of France (Third Republic)
1925
"Their is no room for the regional languages and cultures in a France that intends to mark Europe deeply"
Georges Pomipidou
President of France (Fith Republich)
1974
CANADA MUST FOLLOW THESE VERY INTELIGANT FRENCHMEN ON HOW TO DEAL WITH THE QUEBECOIS AND THE UNITY AND GREATNESS OF CANADA.
LONG LIVE A UNITED CANADA
QUEBEC BELONGS TO CANADA
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN
So ... were you away on March 26, 2007 when Charest was elected for another term ... then on December 8, 2008 when he was voted in again? - all during Harper's reign I might add...
Did you even vote?
Personally I think the Canadian Army is led by the best Canada has. I have nothing but admiration for them.
Royal 22nd Regiment "Je me souviens". I do remember.
Royal 22nd Regiment "Je me souviens". I do remember.
Wrong, the seperatist movement in quebec is getting bigger, mainly because french-immigrations which are mainly for the separation, since i am a separatist, i am exited about it.
In other words, you are a traitor and should be tried and convicted as such.
OK....What is this?
Ownership of National Assembly land in Que. to be reviewed
By Mike De Souza, Canwest News ServiceFebruary 23, 2009 6:01 PM
Ownership of National Assembly land in Que. to be reviewed
OTTAWA — The Harper government is prepared to revisit its ownership of the lawn in front of Quebec’s National Assembly, Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Josee Verner said Monday.
The Quebec government has been seeking to repatriate the land which houses statues of former premiers such as Rene Levesque at least since 2006, but up till now has not received any formal response from Ottawa.
Verner said she addressed the issue during a morning meeting with her Quebec counterpart, Jacques Dupuis.
“We discussed several files, including this one, and we agreed to talk about it again later,” Verner said in the Commons in response to a question from Bloc Quebecois MP Jean Dorion.
“No nation can accept having its national assembly sitting on a piece of land that belongs to another nation,” said Dorion in the House of Commons.
But Verner mocked the Bloc for waiting until now to raise the issue of land ownership.
“The statue of Rene Levesque was installed on federal land by PQ premier Lucien Bouchard in 1999,” Verner said. “Why didn’t they stand up (about this) at that time?”
Former Liberal provincial intergovernmental affairs minister Benoit Pelletier wrote in July 2006 that allowing the federal government to own property with huge symbolic importance to the Quebec nation was undermining the principals of federalism, Montreal daily Le Devoir reported on Saturday.
The newspaper also cited a 19th century document which said the land was leased to the Quebec government on a long-term basis for $50 per year.
The sovereigntist parties in Quebec are also asking the federal government to relinquish its ownership of the Plains of Abraham in Quebec City which was at the heart of a political controversy in recent weeks that forced the cancellation of a planned re-enactment of a 250-year-old battle between British and French troops.
Federal Liberals steered clear of the issue, accusing the Bloc of exploiting it for political gain.
“I think that what Quebecers want is for us to take care of the economy, and (the Bloc is) adding fuel on the fire, when we’re talking about an area like the Plains of Abraham which is a national park that belongs to all Canadians,” said Liberal MP Denis Coderre, after question period in the Commons. “It’s not one nation against another, it belongs to everyone.”
But when asked what he thought about the land in front of the National Assembly, Coderre repeated he wanted to talk about the economy, and not land.
The NDP’s Quebec lieutenant, Thomas Mulcair, was more open to look at the issue of ownership of the Plains of Abraham, although he had his own concerns. “I think that it’s something that can be discussed by both parties as long as nobody builds condos on it,” Mulcair said.
_______________________
Ownership of National Assembly land in Que. to be reviewed
By Mike De Souza, Canwest News ServiceFebruary 23, 2009 6:01 PM
Ownership of National Assembly land in Que. to be reviewed
OTTAWA — The Harper government is prepared to revisit its ownership of the lawn in front of Quebec’s National Assembly, Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Josee Verner said Monday.
The Quebec government has been seeking to repatriate the land which houses statues of former premiers such as Rene Levesque at least since 2006, but up till now has not received any formal response from Ottawa.
Verner said she addressed the issue during a morning meeting with her Quebec counterpart, Jacques Dupuis.
“We discussed several files, including this one, and we agreed to talk about it again later,” Verner said in the Commons in response to a question from Bloc Quebecois MP Jean Dorion.
“No nation can accept having its national assembly sitting on a piece of land that belongs to another nation,” said Dorion in the House of Commons.
But Verner mocked the Bloc for waiting until now to raise the issue of land ownership.
“The statue of Rene Levesque was installed on federal land by PQ premier Lucien Bouchard in 1999,” Verner said. “Why didn’t they stand up (about this) at that time?”
Former Liberal provincial intergovernmental affairs minister Benoit Pelletier wrote in July 2006 that allowing the federal government to own property with huge symbolic importance to the Quebec nation was undermining the principals of federalism, Montreal daily Le Devoir reported on Saturday.
The newspaper also cited a 19th century document which said the land was leased to the Quebec government on a long-term basis for $50 per year.
The sovereigntist parties in Quebec are also asking the federal government to relinquish its ownership of the Plains of Abraham in Quebec City which was at the heart of a political controversy in recent weeks that forced the cancellation of a planned re-enactment of a 250-year-old battle between British and French troops.
Federal Liberals steered clear of the issue, accusing the Bloc of exploiting it for political gain.
“I think that what Quebecers want is for us to take care of the economy, and (the Bloc is) adding fuel on the fire, when we’re talking about an area like the Plains of Abraham which is a national park that belongs to all Canadians,” said Liberal MP Denis Coderre, after question period in the Commons. “It’s not one nation against another, it belongs to everyone.”
But when asked what he thought about the land in front of the National Assembly, Coderre repeated he wanted to talk about the economy, and not land.
The NDP’s Quebec lieutenant, Thomas Mulcair, was more open to look at the issue of ownership of the Plains of Abraham, although he had his own concerns. “I think that it’s something that can be discussed by both parties as long as nobody builds condos on it,” Mulcair said.
_______________________
I'd like to point out none of these places were part of Canada in 1867.
And the Praries were French in 1867. Manitoba used to be bilingual official.
This was part of the agreement from the Provisional Government of Manitoba in exchange for its peaceful joining of Confederation. This agreement was breached.
So technically Lord Durham, Manitoba should revert to being a French nation under its agreement with the crown now shouldn't it?
Long live the Queen and damn those Canadian Anglo's who ruin the good name of the house of Windsor.
Here is Canada in 1870, after it bought the North West Territories and Manitoba the year before ( so in 1867 none of those would be present)
Notice how small Qubec is Logic7, thats all you'd get because thats all that is your "Quebecois Nation"
Notice how small Qubec is Logic7, thats all you'd get because thats all that is your "Quebecois Nation"
Even better ... lookit how big Labrador just got!
That answers the question at to what would happen to NS,NB,&PEI....assuming
that they're interested in that smozzle. I can see a bit of a fist-fight with Danny
Williams and his crew though...and the Native Bands that would reside in this
independent entity of Quebec. 8O
that they're interested in that smozzle. I can see a bit of a fist-fight with Danny
Williams and his crew though...and the Native Bands that would reside in this
independent entity of Quebec. 8O
You have to know colpy, that about 10 post of yours was used in quebec forums, to convince others that we have to separate, keep up the good work guys( colpy, CDN Bear-cannuks and many others) you are helping us .
The only Logic about 7 is that he is taking you all for a ride.. Quebec is not about to separate and the Separatists are losing, not gaining, ground.
The MicMac, Mi'kmaq, Mi'gmaq or Mi'gmaw have only one interest in Quebec separating. It is to claim back their land ( part of the 800 outstanding claims ) that would immediatly expire if Quebec separated.
Link to 800 Claims
So am I helping your separatist cause logic 7 ?
I hope so because I am FRENCH Quebecois... :lol:
The only reason they have won in 2007, it is because the PQ had an homosexuel as a leader of the party, in 2008, pq has lost by very little, why?
Because the media did a very dirty job on the PQ, actually the PQ are the only party who did better than the prediction of the media.
Prediction By the media:
PLQ=45%
ADQ=28%
PQ=25%
Real numbers
PLQ=42%
PQ=36%
ADQ=16%
It shows how the medias are trying to kill us, but they never will.
When you blame everything but the problem, the problem will keep biting your bottom. It's the Jews. It's the homosexuals. It's the media. Come on! It's the separatist dreamers!
I'd like to point out none of these places were part of Canada in 1867.
And the Praries were French in 1867. Manitoba used to be bilingual official.
This was part of the agreement from the Provisional Government of Manitoba in exchange for its peaceful joining of Confederation. This agreement was breached.
So technically Lord Durham, Manitoba should revert to being a French nation under its agreement with the crown now shouldn't it?
Long live the Queen and damn those Canadian Anglo's who ruin the good name of the house of Windsor.
Here is Canada in 1870, after it bought the North West Territories and Manitoba the year before ( so in 1867 none of those would be present)
Notice how small Qubec is Logic7, thats all you'd get because thats all that is your "Quebecois Nation"
It's a coin flip as to who is more deluded. Lord Durham or Logic 7. They are both masters of mythical statistics