Beijing Skyscraper Fire

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
I'd love to mate, got any info on wtc7 being hit by ....say, anything??

Stretch... this goes round and round and round with you. Same old questions each time and when we provide answers you just go on to the next one.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Perhaps it would help your cause if you didn't keep posting the same stuff that has been disproved over and over again. Try to come up with something new and fresh.

He can't, He can't, He can't

That is exactly what i just posted... he asks the same stuff OVER and OVER and OVER. I blame myself for perpetuating it too.
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
I've never seen anything that said wtc7 was hit by anything.......all I ask is you provide links......but sofar all you guys have come up with is oh you wouldn't believe it if we did

WHERE THE PHUK IS YOUR EVIDENCE!!!!???? a simple request
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
got links to support that statement please mate?


Here you are for the 100th time...plus excerpts


Battalion Chief John Norman
Special Operations Command - 22 years

From there, we looked out at 7 World Trade Center again. You could see smoke, but no visible fire, and some damage to the south face. You couldn’t really see from where we were on the west face of the building, but at the edge of the south face you could see that it was very heavily damaged.






Captain Chris Boyle
Engine 94 - 18 years

Boyle: ...on the north and east side of 7 it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good.

Firehouse: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side?

Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it.

Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many?

Boyle: There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered throughout there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it. And so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all right, we’ll head back to the command post. We lost touch with him. I never saw him again that day.



Deputy Chief Peter Hayden
Division 1 - 33 years

...also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.

Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away?


Hayden: No, not right away, and that’s probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn’t make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety.



Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - World Trade Center 7, Building 7
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
I've never seen anything that said wtc7 was hit by anything.......all I ask is you provide links......but sofar all you guys have come up with is oh you wouldn't believe it if we did

WHERE THE PHUK IS YOUR EVIDENCE!!!!???? a simple request

Because you are so PHUCKING thick headed that you ignore every PHUCKING link that is posted. We go round and round with you on this.
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
Here you are for the 100th time...plus excerpts


Battalion Chief John Norman
Special Operations Command - 22 years

From there, we looked out at 7 World Trade Center again. You could see smoke, but no visible fire, and some damage to the south face. You couldn’t really see from where we were on the west face of the building, but at the edge of the south face you could see that it was very heavily damaged.





Captain Chris Boyle
Engine 94 - 18 years

Boyle: ...on the north and east side of 7 it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good.

Firehouse: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side?

Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it.

Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many?

Boyle: There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered throughout there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it. And so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all right, we’ll head back to the command post. We lost touch with him. I never saw him again that day.


Deputy Chief Peter Hayden
Division 1 - 33 years

...also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.

Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away?


Hayden: No, not right away, and that’s probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn’t make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety.


Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - World Trade Center 7, Building 7


cool, is there a timeline for this dialogue?
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
Although I know better...

7 World Trade Center - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"As the North Tower collapsed on September 11, 2001, debris hit 7 World Trade Center, causing heavy damage to the south face of the building."

There's an interesting website out there called Google. Try it and you'll find more info than you could possibly read.


why the hell would I use a google when it has been proven that is censors crap and keeps info on what ya search for, and sends it to the dod
who ya workin' for dude? it aint mankind, I can tell ya, that much!!!!!!
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
WTC7 and Silverstein

Check the links...it's all there. There are more timelines on events of 9/11 than you can possibly fathom.

By the way... these are interviews.
oh so the interviews with "your people " are ok but the interviews with emergency personal and people who were actually onsite and said they heard and saw explosions dont count ......
I understand....;-) now worries mate, it's safe with me.... :lol:
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Oh brother...

In other words folks... we go back to the starting point... again. :roll:
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Sure... you cannot refute the evidence as it is overwhelming... so you'll babble a bit... hurl insults... then ask the same questions over again...the starting point.
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
Sure... you cannot refute the evidence as it is overwhelming... so you'll babble a bit... hurl insults... then ask the same questions over again...the starting point.


go thru any of my posts mate....you'll NEVER FIND ANYWHERE WHERE I HURLED INSULTS AT ANYBODY!!

nice try dude, now I know what your about
tell ya bosses they aint payin' you enough! LOL
wow holy****, you guys are still freakin' out eh?
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
you wish to converse with me any more on this subject pal.....lets get it on.....lets come up with a thread where we can post both sides to the arguement.....