Are you just a belittling prick?
You will have to elevate the maturity level if you expect a response from me.
Are you just a belittling prick?
Why didn't you say so? If we are talking about Christian adherents in Canada, then your comment...
"but the belief in an afterlife leads to bizarre, counter-instinctive, and criminal acts (such as suicide bombings) and allows governing elites to pacify the oppressed with the promise of a reward in heaven."
...is even more baseless.
Whatever. As I said, if you cannot repeat the experiment, your hypothesis is out-of-whack.The scope of the mind is wider than the laboratory experiments.
Moreover, the bush did not talk; this is another mistake in the Torah of Ezra; the bush is the hiding place of the swines and pigs.
God - be glorified - spoke to Moses with an audible voice that only Moses heard it; God spoke through the olive tree that was on the Mount Horeb, when He was not in the tree, but He was over His throne and He sent the voice across the ether waves, so that Moses heard it from that olive tree.
These are some prophetic traditions; i.e. words ascribed to the prophet that he said such words; which needs some checking: some of them may be true or false and fabricated. These are not the ayat of the Quran, which is infallible, and no falsehood may corrupt it in the past or in the future.
Moreover, there are some language idioms and expressions that may be interpreted wrongly.
In addition, the Quran and the Prophet of God Mohammed - salam be to him - warned of the devil and his serious enmity to sons of man or sons of Adam.
The devil comes to man from his left one time, another time from his right side, another time from behind or from before him to hinder man from going to prayer and from every righteous work.
So when you sleep, he starts to suggest to you many things, to let man forget mentioning his Lord, and to show him false dreams.
Then when man awakes, he suggests to him many vain and trivial things to let him forget praising his Lord.
Then when any man forget about mentioning his Lord with gratitude and glorification, the devil will drag him step by step, until he gets complete control on the disbeliever and guide him to oppose God, his Lord Who bestowed on him all blessings and favors, and to oppose the prophet and the Quran, and to spread lies and confusions; in order that such a disbeliever will be a loser.
Whatever. As I said, if you cannot repeat the experiment, your hypothesis is out-of-whack.
About the burning bush that talks, or the olive tree, or whatever version whoever has: the listener was most likely on hallucinogens, or had synapses misfiring, or something was encephalically screwy.
I don't get it, this isn't any worse than all the other sill crap you believe,
He is! For some petty reason he has a burr up his ass!
I haven't. Certainly I've seen things that other people interpret that way, but I've always found that there are much simpler explanations that don't involve such an extraordinary claim. Have you any idea of the many proven ways that human thinking can go wrong? Hallucinations, confabulation, confirmation bias, false memories, magical thinking, pareidolia, logical fallacies, selective thinking, self-deception, wishful thinking, conflation... look them up. Perception and memory by themselves are not to be trusted.The question is: Who among you has not ever seen any observation that might be related to the afterlife?
It is the same problem for the present and the ancient generations. There are the believers in God alone, as are there the atheists, the idolaters and associaters, and the disbelievers.
The disbeliever is proud over his Lord and is haughty: he wants – in order to believe – to see his Lord God with his own eyes; and this is impossible: because God cannot be seen by the eyesight. And the disbeliever too wants to see the afterlife, which is invisible and imperceptible to some extent.
The question is: Who among you has not ever seen any observation that might be related to the afterlife?
Be truthful (to yourselves before being truthful to others) and tell the truth: have you ever seen any observation that may be related to the afterlife, but you disregard it and try to forget about it?
How could he, or you, possibly know that? All it means is that the two of you don't know of natural factors that could account for the observations. If you're not going to give examples it's hard to comment specifically, but by far the most likely explanation is simply that he saw things he didn't properly understand, or was fooled by one of the many ways people do that to themselves.So he mentioned to me some observations that cannot be ascribed to natural factors.
Agreed, but most people find it very easy to convince themselves of the truth of things they want to believe, mostly because, as I indicated, they don't understand the many ways thinking can go wrong. Here are some of them.Of course, there are the confusions, hallucinations, mistakes, wrong interpretation, etc. but this cannot affirm that all such incidents and observations are like that.
Of course not, it's a metaphysical claim, not a scientific claim. The evidence we have, however, strongly suggests that the idea of some part of the personality surviving the death of the body is *extremely* improbable, so improbable I would say as to be not worth taking seriously.All this has been noticed in the present time as well as in the past; and this point at least to the possibility of the next afterlife, which cannot be denied scientifically.
From the religion of a terrorist god.
How could he, or you, possibly know that? All it means is that the two of you don't know of natural factors that could account for the observations. If you're not going to give examples it's hard to comment specifically, but by far the most likely explanation is simply that he saw things he didn't properly understand, or was fooled by one of the many ways people do that to themselves. Agreed, but most people find it very easy to convince themselves of the truth of things they want to believe, mostly because, as I indicated, they don't understand the many ways thinking can go wrong. Here are some of them.
Yeah, I know you're not kidding, but realistically, every one of those examples, despite the lack of details, can be ascribed to misperception, misunderstanding, imaginings, wishful thinking, and other such things. A properly hung and balanced door, for instance, will move in a very slight draft, it doesn't require anything you'd feel as a wind. The story about your friend fearing his brother had died and then finding out that he did is confirmation bias and selective thinking. How many times had he had a bad feeling about a loved one that turned out to be false? People don't remember that kind of information, they just remember coincidences that seem to be significant, but without that information, you don't have the complete dataset, you can't conclude anything from that. Under very poor lighting conditions through a window you saw something white that appeared to be moving along a path and interpreted it as being the ghost of your father. That might be pareidolia, it might be wishful thinking, it might have been a reflective or refractive effect on the window glass of a passing vehicle's lights, you don't have enough information to conclude it must have been the ghost of your father. Your 15-year old son jumping in to support you after your uncle and brother said it was nothing, well, that hardly needs explanation, assuming you're a good father and your son loves and respects you, which I do.And there are many of such observations that I saw which cannot be ascribed to such explanations as hallucinations or imaginations.