The Gray Plane That No One Saw


danieltowsey
Free Thinker
#1
The Gray Plane, That No One Saw

By Daniel J Towsey
May 7th, 2007

<snip>



It absolutely amazes me how people can not see the obvious.
Yet it is right in front of their eyes.

Everyone is looking for a smoking gun, when, all along it has been staring everyone right in the face.

I realized this long ago. So therefore, I feel that it is time again for me to write another ‘TRUTH Article’.

We’ve all seen it probably hundreds of times.

So now that I am going to point out the obvious. You well be able to see it for yourself for the first time.

What I am talking about is the second plane to hit the world trade center.

Have another look at it. What do you see? It’s not my imagination. It is clearly a gray unmarked windowless airplane. Only the military has these.

I dare you to show me an airplane with commercial markings and windows.

Just the other day here in Canada I caught the end of a special on 911, on television.

I do not know what the name of the show was. But that does not matter. What matters is that They played a zoomed in slow motion shot of the plane as it flew into the wtc, Where you can clearly see that it is a slightly dark gray, very shinny windowless plane. It was a shot from the sunny side, so the plane was very clear to see.

What this proves, is that there are plenty of very clear videos of the second plane Available from the corporate media. And they have chosen not to show them.

I watched a live video on that day of people’s reaction on the ground. These people were saying that it did not look like any commercial aircraft they have ever seen. Some witnesses said that it had a military like emblem in the front.

Remember this.

In any just court of justice. When a person on the stand gives testimony. If during that testimony it is proven that just one thing they said is shown to be a lie. Then their whole testimony is erased from the record. And the person usually gets charged with perjury. And goes to jail. So this applies to the official story on 911 too.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I fear not evil doers; I fear those that do nothing about it.

Telling the truth in times of deception is a revolutionary act.

We need a truth revolution. Are you going to join it?

First you need to start doing your own thinking and doing your own research. Do not trust anything you hear from the corporate media. Pick a topic. Pick a topic that you question. When you have done sufficient research. You can then contribute your knowledge of truth to the pot. Then tell your friends, neighbors or anyone you can.

Just understand that this ‘truth revolution’ can not have a leader or a structure. For they well destroy it. If everyone starts spreading the truth their way. The wave of humanity will win.

The only weapon against deceit and lies is ‘truth’. If you value your freedoms, realize that there is no freedom without truth.

Liars and deceivers are mentally ill. Only truth will make a person, country, or this planet will again.
Last edited by karrie; Jan 7th, 2008 at 10:11 AM..Reason: breach of forum rules
 
TenPenny
#2
Quote: Originally Posted by danieltowseyView Post

In any just court of justice. When a person on the stand gives testimony. If during that testimony it is proven that just one thing they said is shown to be a lie. Then their whole testimony is erased from the record. And the person usually gets charged with perjury. And goes to jail. So this applies to the official story on 911 too.

Hoist by your own petard. The above statement is not true. Does this make everything else you said a lie? I guess so, by your rules.
 
danieltowsey
Free Thinker
#3
What are you talking about. When were you in a court of law where perjury was allowed? And since when do they allow lies to be accepted into the record? If your a sign of how society's thinking is going..Thats pretty scary..By the way. Lying on the stand after swearing to tell the truth, at minimum is an insult to the court and may very easily get you a contempt of court charge...
 
TenPenny
#4
Quote: Originally Posted by danieltowseyView Post

What are you talking about. When were you in a court of law where perjury was allowed? And since when do they allow lies to be accepted into the record? If your a sign of how society's thinking is going..Thats pretty scary..By the way. Lying on the stand after swearing to tell the truth, at minimum is an insult to the court and may very easily get you a contempt of court charge...

ONE LIE by a witness does not make their whole testimony thrown out. Have you ever been in a court of law where no one lied on the stand? How many cases are actually tried as perjury?

I never said lies were allowed to be entered into the record; you said that one lie meant that all of the testimony by that witness was thrown out, which is patently not true. If you are a sign of how society's thinking is going, God help us all.
 
Niflmir
Free Thinker
#5
Quote: Originally Posted by danieltowseyView Post

... Have another look at it. What do you see? Itís not my imagination. It is clearly a gray unmarked windowless airplane. Only the military has these.

I dare you to show me an airplane with commercial markings and windows.
...

Because I like kicking a dead horse, I will take you up on that offer. Exhibit a. Exhibit b. Of course that is largely irrelevent because the second jet had windows.
 
TenPenny
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by NiflmirView Post

Because I like kicking a dead horse, I will take you up on that offer. Exhibit a. Exhibit b. Of course that is largely irrelevent because the second jet had windows.

But you know, one lie gets a person charged with perjury, and ALL of his testimony thrown out.
 
Walter
#7
I've heard people say that if you look really closely at the video you can see Richard Nixon at the controls of the plane and Andy Warhol is the co-pilot.
Last edited by Walter; May 15th, 2007 at 09:42 AM..Reason: spelling
 
eh1eh
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by WalterView Post

I've heard people say that if you look really closely at the video you can see Richard Nixon at the controls of the plane and Andy Warhol in the co-pilot.

Ronald Regan was flying the first one.
 
Phil B
#9
Quote: Originally Posted by eh1ehView Post

Ronald Regan was flying the first one.

I heard it was Glenn Miller, with Lord lucan as his co-pilot in the first plane. Amelia Earhart was flying the second plane with the crew and passengers of the Mary Celeste on board for good measure.
 
#juan
No Party Affiliation
#10
Quote: Originally Posted by Phil BView Post

I heard it was Glenn Miller, with Lord lucan as his co-pilot in the first plane. Amelia Earhart was flying the second plane with the crew and passengers of the Mary Celeste on board for good measure.

No, you've got it all wrong. The planes were on remote control......I have this on good authority from one of the posters here....Which leaves the question; Where are the passengers What would you do with all those passengers? The passengers are on the FBI's secret witness protection program. It's so secret, the FBI can't find them.
 
Phil B
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by #juanView Post

No, you've got it all wrong. The planes were on remote control......I have this on good authority from one of the posters here....Which leaves the question; Where are the passengers What would you do with all those passengers? The passengers are on the FBI's secret witness protection program. It's so secret, the FBI can't find them.

You What!!

You mean my mate Mental Mickey has got it all wrong?
Too many atomic thunderbusters - that has always been his problem.
 
TenPenny
#12
Hey, I just looked up in the sky, and there was a gray plane that I didn't see.

Better take cover, I don't know where it's headed.
 
flipside
#13
Why would Ronald Reagan be trying to fly a remote controlled airplane? And everyone knows Richard Nixon can hardly drive a car so your theories are already falling to pieces.

And as stated early who cares if one plane had no windows because one of them did you know it sure did have windows and everyone knows a plane with windows will level a large skyscrapper in less than two hours and to prove it I have 2 samples almost back to back proving that a plane with windows will level a building nearly the same way a controlled demolition would. I think Popular Crock did an article on this. Which means... duh that the plane without windows must have had windows because that building fell in the exact same manner...debunked!

I can also debunk another theory.. Flight 93 obviously crashed nearly straight into the ground, I think we can all agree because you can clearly see from the aerial photos a perfect outline of the planes shape in the very very very soft ground. So soft most of the debris sank right into the earth leaving the perfect outline, well excluding the engine they found in a nearby pond and the debris of plane parts, body parts, passports, a detailed book on the 911 attacks and a dvd of loose change. (Ha so Loose Change was out before the crash i previously looked over this!) But you need to understand science to know what happen here,.. you see when a plane dive bombs into very very very soft soil the nose of the plane will drive itself underground with the blackbox and then the rest of the plane (the tail) slams into the rest of the plane and will shatter causing the parts of the plane not burried yet to bounced backwards and out, backwards and out, backwards and out which explains the debris being spead around for 8 miles. You see what sank into the ground stayed there and the rest bounced backwards and out.

wow thats alot of debunkin right there...
 
wallyj
#14
The 2nd last line of the original post,Liars and decievers are mentally ill. I would also add those can watch the same video as MILLIONS of other people ,and somehow see something different.The more the conspiracists babble on the crazier they appear. Just today,renowned metallurgist,Rosie O,dumbbell, said that Guilliano was part of the cover-up after 9/11. Pass the tinfoil.
 
flipside
#15
Quote: Originally Posted by wallyjView Post

The 2nd last line of the original post,Liars and decievers are mentally ill. I would also add those can watch the same video as MILLIONS of other people ,and somehow see something different.The more the conspiracists babble on the crazier they appear. Just today,renowned metallurgist,Rosie O,dumbbell, said that Guilliano was part of the cover-up after 9/11. Pass the tinfoil.

Come on don't pile Rosie into all of us! Of course Guillianoganbino wasn't involved he's a nice guy and did really good things. Theres no evidence to prove anything theres so little evidence just try to prove anything Rosie you dumb bell.. Ha it would be funny to hear Donald Trump rip right into her on her thoughts of 9/11..haha he would set her straight on 9/11 eh?
These dam celebrities coming forward are not scientists and i will only believe a scientist who is proven to be legit by our trusty ol governments. Stand by your country my good men and obey for god jesus christ amen our plan will fall apart!
 
snfu73
#16
*sigh*...let's face it...aliens from the planet kriptopod attacked the US...it's plain and obvious to me...for a millisecond as the second "plane" was hitting the tower, you can CLEARLY see a tiny alienoid figure waving at the camera, and chuckling in a freaky little way.
 
TenPenny
#17
I was driving across the burning desert, when I spotted six jet planes leaving six white trails across the bleak terrain.
 
danieltowsey
Free Thinker
#18
xxxxxxxxxxx
 
jimshort19
#19
Walter, "I've heard people say that if you look really closely at the video you can see Richard Nixon at the controls of the plane and Andy Warhol is the co-pilot."

Walter has been drinking with Towsey again.

Towsey, how did you get out of the nut house? Why has Towsey not been banned from this forum? What does a person have to do to get banned from this forum? Say a naughty word? Ideas mean nothing. Odd for a forum.
 
Pangloss
#20
Danieltowsey:

Nutbar trifecta now complete! Krakra, cranston36 and our latest member of the club: Danieltowsey!

Welcome, my kooky friend, welcome. Here, take this pill. . .

Pangloss
 
MikeyDB
#21
The dead-giveaway was the lasso of truth hanging out of a cockpit window....
 
karrie
No Party Affiliation
#22
The status for moderation is laid out in the forum rules jimshort. We try not to censor any more than needed. Content is not as much of a concern as conduct. Most posters here post well. They post intelligent, well thought out, reasonable articles. And most respond in kind, with intelligent, well thought out, reasonable rebuttals or contributions. The odd few post tripe, but the reasonable few are generally quick to explain why it's tripe, without resorting to personal attacks.

That the odd piece (or few, as we seem to have an influx the last couple days) makes it on which isn't up to the caliber of the majority of the forum, isn't of a lot of concern. It gets torn down pretty fast. Like a dessert in amongst all the meaty posts we sink our teeth into most days.
 
jimshort19
#23
The World Trade Centre collapse was faked. The buildings were never there in the first place. The City of New York was a collosal plot by Rockefeller to take over the world.

Over to you, Towsey!
 
MikeyDB
#24
No sorry Gymshorts

The WTC collapse was engineered to permit an American corporation to mint genuine fold-out memorial coins..... with genuine silver from the basement of the site....
It's about the money bud.....
 
jimshort19
#25
MikeyDB,"The WTC collapse was engineered to permit an American corporation to mind genuine fold-out memorial coins..... with genuine silver from the basement of the site....
It's about the money bud....."

I don't know how you got left off of Pangloss's list of nutbars. What to hell is the matter with that woman?
 
MikeyDB
#26
You got the place that was reserved for me Gym!
 
MikeyDB
#27
Don't sulk now Gym....

Haul out some more of that milrate math....great stuff.....
 
jimshort19
#28
Does this thread connect to Towsey's 'Holocaust? Why it must be questioned' thread? Yes, but only in the mind of Towsey.

Karrie, how sunny of you. Perhaps you have the patience of Job.
 
MikeyDB
#29
C'mon Gym....

You made the effort to personalize your criticisms of my contributions to CC and now you're sucking up to Karrie....

Go play with your milrates....
 
EagleSmack
#30
Quote: Originally Posted by #juanView Post

No, you've got it all wrong. The planes were on remote control......I have this on good authority from one of the posters here....Which leaves the question; Where are the passengers What would you do with all those passengers? The passengers are on the FBI's secret witness protection program. It's so secret, the FBI can't find them.

Although we are at odds 99.9% of the time this is a good question that conspiracy theorists will not and cannot answer.

"What happened to the people on the planes if they did not crash into the WTC?"

The only answer I have received was

"You'll have to ask your government."
 

Similar Threads

1
I want this guy flying my plane!!
by Stretch | Nov 1st, 2008
13
The Gray Men in Tall Towers.
by American Voice | Jul 19th, 2004
no new posts