"BeeJay, why are you flame baiting eaglesmack?"....
Flame baiting eaglesmack?? Johnnny...you`re reading waaay too much into my replies. Eaglesmack is a big boy now. He doesn`t need a moderator to step in and defend him, do you Eagle? If Eaglesmack can dish out his blend of sarcasim, innuendo and plain childish remarks in MY post, then shouldn`t I have a right to defend MY post from such?
"It takes attention away from the message in the original post and takes away your credability"....
What credibility? I didn`t write the OP. It was a c/p from an on-line site (which was taken from a British television network Channel 4 News and
still on it`s web page as so called fact) that I thought would strike up some interesting debate. If such articles offend or piss off a handfull around here, too ****ing bad.
"Your trolling and i hope the moderators see you as such"...
If you and a few others here squeal that term (troll) loud enough it may just work again. Thats what the `report` button is for.
"Your description of the
Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia for example was deliberate so you could flame bait people."....
Again, I didn`t write that piece for Wikipedia. I refered to it in response to someone`s (I forget whom at the moment) mentioning it and to point out that the incident in question was NOT in fact a `friendly fire` action. It was a deliberate act by US forces and if true, a cowardly act, that US forces are by now known to have carried out on numerous occassions. Same ole **** but in a different out-house.
"grow up"...
Perhaps we could all benefit from that suggestion by not taking this or any other subject so personal and mix a little humour throughout these hot topics.
ba-ha-ha-ha-ha *rolls eyes*
