Re: I think it make a lot of sense that people would BASH Christians.
And about to embark on the "school of life". :smile:
23 fresh out of school.
And about to embark on the "school of life". :smile:
23 fresh out of school.
That true is was in relation to men (in that is was an male audience). I'm pretty sure that God would find some way to close up any loop-holes. The one for this would be adultery does not seem to be a sin that will get a man (or woman) tossed into the lake for eternity. No such mercy for fallen angels though.
According to the Bible they are not given in marriage and when they appear in human form they would have all the parts. Jude says their sin was going after strange flesh so that is leaning to them having genitals. If you are going to sin why not have a child by another angel? It might be that only 'male' Angels fell so there were no 'female Angels'. In the dept of what does the Bible say compared to what do sheeple say there would seem to be a gap between camps.Do fallen angels have genitals?
Yet it's your way?You either belive in God, or you belive in TRUTH, get over it.. You can't escape..
Seek and you will find, one way or another..
But in any case being presumptuous IS NOT THE WAY...
If you did that I'd call you an A. Sure. Why not? I guess an A+ for actually thinking about it is in order.
You can't prove B exists metamathematically you can only assume it does until you get there.
Well done.
DG - Aggain you are cCoorect -The Guy is a born again evangelical moron that cannot be shaken from his
mistaken belief in reality. It goes on and on like the speeches of government
leaders. Pay no attention and judgement shall not come your way, unto the
pages of the forum. amen. I think.
Let us all go on make mockery of a serious topic now.
According to the Bible they are not given in marriage and when they appear in human form they would have all the parts. Jude says their sin was going after strange flesh so that is leaning to them having genitals. If you are going to sin why not have a child by another angel? It might be that only 'male' Angels fell so there were no 'female Angels'. In the dept of what does the Bible say compared to what do sheeple say there would seem to be a gap between camps.
If I give this correct the Bible says a whole lot of people will be brought out of the grave at the time Christ returns, in terms of people who have been married multiple times they are said to be equal to the Angels in heaven in that they do nor marry nor are they given in marriage. That would seem to mean the ones that are resurrected do not have children as that would be adultery'
To carry this subject to it's conclusion one question remains (in all hope, lol), will God give Angels, that end up in the place called a New Heaven, in marriage so they can have their own children once they are in a place where none of them will ever fall into sin and therefore no 'children' of their would ever be sent to the lake. That possibility could have existed if they were having children while still in this earth rather than the place we eventually end up in that is called the new earth. What parent, human or angel, could ever be truly be comforted if one or more of their children was in the fiery lake?
DG - Aggain you are cCoorect -
The Guy - Just an Intolerant Ahole in my opinion and that is from a highly Tolerant Ahole, myself..
Some guy is silly.
And one might say that (The) + (Guy) + Statements Squared minus- Thought to the 3rd minus Tolerance to the Nth minus intelligence plus the square root of Zero = Intolerant, Dumb Ashole Mo Fuk{What reasons can you think of, that would cause others to disagree with or deny that which is observably true. }
One reason is this...
They assume that simply because it is NOT TRUE from some other perspective that it is not true AT ALL..
Example
one might say 1+1 = 2
another could say 1+1=11
simply because in some other perspective one could say
1 + 1 =11 is TRUE
does NOT mean that
1+1 = 2 is FALSE...