In his second inaugural address Comrade Obama said that ten years of war was coming to an end. I guess he was wrong.
Maybe and maybe another ten is just beginning! -
"Looks like it's back to business as usual in Iraq for U.S. troops!"
No it doesn't and the link you provided doesn't come close to saying the US will send troops.
They might send weapons and ammo (which has already been claimed that US weapons have already landed in the militant's hands) and they may even provide some UAV's or a C-130 to blow up a few things, but nobody in the US has any desire to go back there and even the government is standing away from even suggesting sending troops into Iraq again.
The current Iraq government can't even get a pat on the back for moral support.
It's another one of the quaint customs around here. Post an article on a subject, then "interpret" the article to say whatever you got in your head. Or just flat-out lie about what the article says."Looks like it's back to business as usual in Iraq for U.S. troops!"
No it doesn't and the link you provided doesn't come close to saying the US will send troops.
They might send weapons and ammo (which has already been claimed that US weapons have already landed in the militant's hands) and they may even provide some UAV's or a C-130 to blow up a few things, but nobody in the US has any desire to go back there and even the government is standing away from even suggesting sending troops into Iraq again.
The current Iraq government can't even get a pat on the back for moral support.
Why are you letting John Howard off the hook?Bush and Blair's legacy.
No, I mean John Howard. He wasn't part of the "Coalition of the Billing." He volunteered, apparently under the delusion that it would make people think Australia in foreign affairs is something other than the metoo of the English-speaking world.You mean the running dogs of the willing?
"Looks like it's back to business as usual in Iraq for U.S. troops!"
No it doesn't and the link you provided doesn't come close to saying the US will send troops.
They might send weapons and ammo (which has already been claimed that US weapons have already landed in the militant's hands) and they may even provide some UAV's or a C-130 to blow up a few things, but nobody in the US has any desire to go back there and even the government is standing away from even suggesting sending troops into Iraq again.
The current Iraq government can't even get a pat on the back for moral support.
JLM; said:Nothing that was said on the news tonight would preclude troops from going back to Iraq! Of course any sane person on this side of the pond would hope it doesn't happen!
Well, mebbe another set of deployments might mean that we'll find those nebulous WMD after all.
The current Iraq government can't even get a pat on the back for moral support.
What happens on Obama's watch is attributable to Obama. That's the way the system works.
Absolutely correct...................................within the confines of the U.S.A. -