No we are not, we are discussing whether a fetus is considered human...
Well...it seems that, for the most part, everyone is in agreement that a "fetus" is a human being. So how about you answer the question I posed.
No we are not, we are discussing whether a fetus is considered human...
gerryh when did you change your mind about a fetus is human?
Well...it seems that, for the most part, everyone is in agreement that a "fetus" is a human being. So how about you answer the question I posed.
If we outlawed abortion based of the fetus being human, then we would have to outlaw war, which would crash the economy worldwide and would take decades to recover from. We would have to outlaw tazers, guns, knives and brainwash every child born so they get violently ill every time they think of doing harm to another. And then the population of the planet would triple every twenty five years and we would all starve to death within the next fifty and then there would be no more humans to have abortions because we would have aborted the entire race. Might not be a bad idea.Well...it seems that, for the most part, everyone is in agreement that a "fetus" is a human being. So how about you answer the question I posed.
I never did say that I could justify killing a human, a fetus. In fact, I have never posted my position on abortion. It's not relevant. However, what I believe shouldn't necessarily be enforced on others.
gerryh when did you change your mind about a fetus is human?
Ok, if the 2 of you agree that it is a living human being, how do you justify killing that human life?
I've probably explained it to you 20 times on this forum. I can no longer be bothered.
In 1988, the Supreme Court of Canada struck down Canada's abortion law as unconstitutional. The law was found to violate Section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms because it infringed upon a woman's right to "life, liberty and security of person."
Chief Justice Brian Dickson wrote: "Forcing a woman, by threat of criminal sanction to carry a foetus to term unless she meets certain criteria unrelated to her own priorities and aspirations, is a profound interference with a woman's body and thus a violation of her security of the person."
Why do you keep debating an issue that has no bearing on an abortion debate? Please stop pretending that it does, or look into something other than religious abortion sites to gain some insight.
Here's the issue, clearly stated via a ruling that struck down Canada's old abortion law:
Notice that it doesn't have anything to do with the definition of human life as it pertains to the fetus?
After reading this entire thread, I am beginning to wish my mother believed in abortion.:roll:For many, not admitting that a fetus is a real human being is how they justify abortion. It does have alot to do with abortion.
Your "lame" reasoning of "it not being your responsibility or right to impose on another person" is a cop out. If it's a real, live, human....a baby..... then it is EVERYBODY's responsibility to ensure the saftey of that baby. If it is a real live human baby, then killing it is no different than killing a 1 month old...or a 1 year old, or a 5 year old.
and the law is an ass and is wrong.
It might appear that way if you only read biased headlines. Dig a little deeper, it makes complete sense.