...It is hard to overstate how serious this is.
Those that believe voter fraud is acceptable don't seem to have a problem with it.
...It is hard to overstate how serious this is.
Those that believe voter fraud is acceptable don't seem to have a problem with it.
Next nowhere in the post quoted did the poster even mention a 22 year old. But you added that to your reply to make it appear he had.
No he didn't. You just read more into it than what was there. You have a bad habit of doing that.
Was I asking you?
He did answer. You should pay more attention.Me have a habit like that. On a rare ocassion. Now let the little fellow answer.
I'm going to reserve judgement on this affair until we get some more information. It is too simple to track this back to the person(s) that rented the site.Getting copies of the voters list is not all that difficult either. I just don't see any wanna be politician being in the know because of the ease of catching them. I can see a misguided supporter doing it on his/her own.
Oh I have been following the events. And as more information was published it was clear that it was not a single 22 year old.
Next nowhere in the post quoted did the poster even mention a 22 year old. But you added that to your reply to make it appear he had. He stated he was waiting for more info. His words – Reserve Judgment.
You on the other hand prefer to lash out.
Same as when you called a member, a former Soldier a Baby Killer.
I have underlined the part of his post I was responding to for your benefit. I was questioning his intelligence at possibly believing such a complex and intentional fraud at a national level could be perpetrated by a single person.
Now on another note, what's the deal with your interjection into this. I posted a response to another member and you jump in "with a sledge-hammer" to use your words. I am guessing you must be a big CPC supporter because just like the party you are condemning me for doing something that you yourself are doing. That is the common M.O. of the Cons, most times they are doing far worse things that what they are complaining about.
I will however send you my sympathies, I am sure you must be having a tough time right now trying to reconcile your support for our current government against your disgust for the tactics that are now being revealed. I suspect it is difficult to continue support for a bunch of crooks and liars no matter how much you agree with their position on a few political issues.
No I am not a big supporter of the CPC - Guess you should catch up on my posts.
You have a habit of questioning others intelligence as if you were the end all and be all of intelligence . My opinion you are the end all.
You slammed him for reserving judgment and waiting for more info. Is that wrong?
Then you accuse me of supporting liars and crooks.
Myself I find you to be and I will try to be polite - A supercilious Dumb Fuk, who while some what aged in years have not kept your maturity or intelligence level at the same rate of increase in years.
Due to my job I don't have time to check all the posts all the time, that will be different during break-up, so I apologize for possibly confusing you with a different member who is a big CPC supporter. I also apologize for suggesting you support liars and crooks, once again I had you confused with someone else.
Do I question intelligence a lot? Maybe, but contrary to your opinion I am a very smart guy. Your delusion that I am not mature or intelligent is due to your inability to accept that I am blunt and direct in what i say without a care of what may be PC or not. If more people were like that the world would be better.
I actually "slammed" him for thinking this could be perpetrated by one person, not for reserving judgement on whether it is connected to the CPC. If you were a little smarter you would comprehend the difference.
I doubt the G-G can do that. It's true that he decides who will form the government and he can dissolve the House, but I doubt a few subverted ridings would be an adequate justification for that. I heard a guy on CBC radio this morning talking about it, a former chief electoral officer. Any voter can seek to have an election in a single riding overturned, but a judge has to be convinced that enough voters were affected to have changed the outcome, like if 500 people didn't make it to a polling station because they were misdirected and the margin of victory was less than that. Then the judge can overturn the election and the seat becomes vacant, so there'll have to be a by-election.Realistically I don't think the GG would toss the entire election.. .
You might want to reassess your position. This was a deliberate attempt to directly subvert an election, not at all the usual mudslinging and pork barreling and BS that goes on all the time. This is in a different class altogether.... as far as I'm concerned it's a NON EVENT.
You might want to reassess your position. This was a deliberate attempt to directly subvert an election, not at all the usual mudslinging and pork barreling and BS that goes on all the time. This is in a different class altogether.
I take it from that you're prepared to believe the media made all this up and so far we have no facts at all?... So until that happens we don't know if it's a different class altogether. How much sh*t does the media generate?
some of them even have enough brains to be able to spell correctly! :smile:
as with most cases of political contraversy,.....
as far as I'm concerned it's a NON EVENT.