Canada scores 2nd last on energy efficiency study

[L Gilbert]

ACEEE | The ACEEE 2012 International Energy Efficiency Scorecard

Yeah, have to join to download the report.

 

[Goober]

Yeah, have to join to download the report.

I missed that-

 

[L Gilbert]

Umm, the study was energy efficiency not usage.

Yeah, subject to relevant parameters like GDP.

I missed that-

After 3rd try I got the report. Not sure if I will stay a member of the group, though.

 

[L Gilbert]

Like efficient use of energy no matter the amount used given climate.

you mean regardless of climate and distance. Like I said, I haven't read anything in the report that adjusts for either distance or climate.

 

[Goober]

Umm, the study was energy efficiency not usage.

Try reading it, it helps.

7 posts to get ignorant- Still not a record.

 

[L Gilbert]

Does the report take distance into account?

Like I said 3 times now, "regardless of climate and distance"

 

[CDNBear]

It's a simple question.

It would have to be, you asked it.

 

[Goober]

Does it it take distance into account?


It's a simple question.

Rather ignorant poster. Is that how you will be for your short time here.

 

[Goober]

Then answer it.

You answer it.

 

[CDNBear]

Rather ignorant poster. Is that how you will be for your short time here.

That was rhetorical right?

Then answer it.

LG already did. Which makes it even funnier.

 

[Goober]

That was rhetorical right?

LG already did. Which makes it even funnier.

Like Whos on first.

 

[L Gilbert]

Then answer it.

Read it yourself.

 

[CDNBear]

No he did not.


Does the study take into account distance?


This is about efficiently not usage.


Perhaps distance is not mentioned or accounted for.

Yes he did, lol.

 

[CDNBear]

Was there a link I missed?

You didn't ask for one. You asked him a question, he answered it, lol.

You being fuzzy's mentor, I can see where he gets his goalpost shuffling from, lol.

 

[L Gilbert]

No he did not.

Yeah. I did. Just didn't use a two-letter, single-syllable reply.

Does the study take into account distance?

Here it is for ya, Dopey. NO. I guess judging by your responses so far I better include the definition just in case you were wondering about that complicated answer, too:
from Merriam-Webster
1no

adv \ˈnō\



1
a chiefly Scottish : notb —used as a function word to express the negative of an alternative choice or possibility <shall we go out to dinner or no>

This is about efficiently not usage.


Perhaps distance is not mentioned or accounted for.

yeah, I said that a few times now. Happy you clued in finally.

 

[Goober]

Was there a link I missed?

Yes- It is supposed to be in Africa- Off you go.

 

[CDNBear]

 

[L Gilbert]

Was there a link I missed?

The link in the OP referring to the news report about the report and one that goober posted referring to the report itself, so far.

 

[Goober]

So you assume they didn't take distance into account?

Did you read the complete report

 

[L Gilbert]

So you assume they didn't take distance into account?

Going by the fact that they lay out their parameters for the study right near the very front of the report and didn't say anything about adjusting for area/distance, or climate, yep. You bet I assumed they omitted it.