Whoa- The picture does not look like he was in a fight for his life but that may not be accurate. Pictures as CCTV on a number of occasions show only what you think you see. Easy to misinterpret at times. Very easy.
Bloody George Zimmerman
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
Whoa- The picture does not look like he was in a fight for his life but that may not be accurate. Pictures as CCTV on a number of occasions show only what you think you see. Easy to misinterpret at times. Very easy.
Removed inappropriate language and blatant insult
Time out.
There is nobody here who does not know about Andem's warning.
Last edited by a moderator:
Actually, I made up my mind on my 20th birthday that I NEVER wanted to see a man shot.
That day I killed my first deer.
I believe this is what we call reverse discrimination. George Zimmerman called 911 broke of the pursuit then had his head beat on a curb until the skittle totin 6 foot gang associated punk was shot dead. But hey let's not include the facts.
Not need, want. How come you have such a difficult time understanding what is written in front of you? Some people are interested and want to know what motivates people like Colpy.
Personally I don't care how bloody he was or wasn't he followed the kid down the street with a gun.
He started this whole thing and all the guy was doing was talking on his cell phone. Zimmerman is
guilty of poor judgement is that it? No he decided to take matters into his own hands and now he
will likely pay the price for it.
If he approached me on the street and tried to hold me without having a badge I would have beat the
hell out of too, or worse. If you are not a cop and you attempt to restrain me without paper work you
are taking a chance that the person is going to protect himself as this young guy tried to do.
He couldn't win a fight so he shot him and fight Zimmerman started as he provoked it.
How do we know he started it? He went down the street armed and attempted to restrain someone
who did nothing wrong without a shred of proof, because he looked suspicious. Its only too bad he
gets to live while the guilty person is still walking round.
He started this whole thing and all the guy was doing was talking on his cell phone. Zimmerman is
guilty of poor judgement is that it? No he decided to take matters into his own hands and now he
will likely pay the price for it.
If he approached me on the street and tried to hold me without having a badge I would have beat the
hell out of too, or worse. If you are not a cop and you attempt to restrain me without paper work you
are taking a chance that the person is going to protect himself as this young guy tried to do.
He couldn't win a fight so he shot him and fight Zimmerman started as he provoked it.
How do we know he started it? He went down the street armed and attempted to restrain someone
who did nothing wrong without a shred of proof, because he looked suspicious. Its only too bad he
gets to live while the guilty person is still walking round.
He was permitted to carry a gun, he called 911 and once instructed to stop following the kid he did. Unfortunately, the innocent little kid who stood over six feet decided to attack Zimmerman and was shot. Zimmerman may have been stupid in following the kid, but using your thinking every woman who is raped for getting too drunk or dressing provocatively or just waiting too long to say "No." had it coming.
The fact of the matter is that the Media misrepresented the facts, the District Attorney charged Zimmerman for political expediency and Trayvon Martin wasn't the sweet little skittle eater. The person that got this kid killed was himself.
I notice that there are a lot of angry replies to this thread. But again I urge all of you to be cautious in your opinions and replies because the facts have NOT been ascertained in a court of law. All we are getting is a bunch of opinions from people who were not there or from the newspapers who have their own agendas.
Recall previously how I urged the same caution because of our discussion of the nefarious "Wilding" case. Back then thousands of angry whites said this affirmed their view of young black men. Rush Limbaugh had a field day that lasted one week over it as well in which he repeated that black men were all out to rape white women. Then, a few years later, we learned that these guys were all innocent. Now a new documentary has been made on it:
Ken Burns co-directs the powerful documentary 'The Central Park Five' - CSMonitor.com
Also remember that Limbaugh never retracted his comments after the truth was disclosed. And those racist cops retired and are now enjoying a good pension when they should have been arrested, charged with conspiracy under the RICO statute, and been forced to spend the rest of their lives in jail.
Therefore, again, before making such angry posts, proceed with caution until ALL the facts have been fully disclosed.
I notice that there are a lot of angry replies to this thread. But again I urge all of you to be cautious in your opinions and replies because the facts have NOT been ascertained in a court of law. All we are getting is a bunch of opinions from people who were not there or from the newspapers who have their own agendas.
Recall previously how I urged the same caution because of our discussion of the nefarious "Wilding" case. Back then thousands of angry whites said this affirmed their view of young black men. Rush Limbaugh had a field day that lasted one week over it as well in which he repeated that black men were all out to rape white women. Then, a few years later, we learned that these guys were all innocent. Now a new documentary has been made on it:
Ken Burns co-directs the powerful documentary 'The Central Park Five' - CSMonitor.com
Also remember that Limbaugh never retracted his comments after the truth was disclosed. And those racist cops retired and are now enjoying a good pension when they should have been arrested, charged with conspiracy under the RICO statute, and been forced to spend the rest of their lives in jail.
Therefore, again, before making such angry posts, proceed with caution until ALL the facts have been fully disclosed.
You are absolutely correct.
My reaction is exactly that:
a reaction to the railroading of a man that has NOT been proven guilty.
Calling the kid a ****** doesnt seem like youre reacting only to zimmermans lack of proven guilt. Which, btw, is six astrisks which leave me wondering what six letter slur you leveled on a black kid.
The way this forum has been replacing with asterisks common words like analytic (this one now fixed) I will not prejudge someone when that happens...in this case this is just what happened when the press had Zimmerman tagged as "white" and that picture of a white man killing a black kid is now "imprinted" on a lot of people's mind, and they see racism around every corner.
see http://forums.canadiancontent.net/members-lounge/111668-shooter-vs-s.html