B.C. judge rules father guilty of “family violence” for calling trans son “she”

JLM

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Hoid said:
Let's be reasonable. Who is better able to make a judgement. A jurist in a court who is able to listen to and question each person involved and weigh that evidence against a life time spent in the study of law and come to an impartial evidence-based decision - or an internet troll who has read a blog post and has lots of conflicted feelings about right and wrong and guns?
Click to expand...


Depends on the preformed opinions of the jurist! A jurist is exactly like you and me- our peer if you prefer!
 
taxslave

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Serryah said:
Found this interesting - the previous report/article about this case.
https://www.thepostmillennial.com/b...ormone-injections-despite-fathers-objections/
Goes into WHY the court ruled why it did.
Apparently the mom was okay with the injections, dad was not, dad was stalling and the court feared the child would try to commit suicide, again, if not given the injections.
So...
You can't tell me this father was not into harming his kid.
I'll continue to look into your stuff, Colpy, and rebuttal you likely tomorrow.
Click to expand...
Sounds more like the father is trying to save his kid from being a guinnea pig for big pharma. ANd social programing by the loupy left.
 
taxslave

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Hoid said:
Let's be reasonable. Who is better able to make a judgement. A jurist in a court who is able to listen to and question each person involved and weigh that evidence against a life time spent in the study of law and come to an impartial evidence-based decision - or an internet troll who has read a blog post and has lots of conflicted feelings about right and wrong and guns?
Click to expand...
Are you still conflicted?
 
petros

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,426
11,472
113
Low Earth Orbit
taxslave said:
Sounds more like the father is trying to save his kid from being a guinnea pig for big pharma. ANd social programing by the loupy left.
Click to expand...
At 14 it's doubtful he dropped and had the chance to decide after the mega dose of testosterone.

How much of this is mom's doing because she wanted a girl?
 
Kreskin

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
I'm sure there is more to this case than a 140 character news bite.
 
JLM

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Colpy said:
Justice Francesca Marzari, a British Columbia Supreme Court Justice, ruled last week that the father of a 14-year-old transgender boy (biological female) was guilty of “family violence” for refusing to affirm his daughter’s male gender identity.


The father, who is anonymously listed as “C.D.” throughout the court document to protect the identity of “A.B.,” his daughter, is also banned from discussing the ruling publicly in order to prevent A.B. from being “exposed” to hurtful writing or commentary that does not affirm her gender identity.
Click to expand...


Should the cost of this shit be borne by the taxpayer?
 
Cannuck

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
Who else will if the taxpayers don't?
The only real question is, it cheaper to pay through taxes or insurance premiums. As far as quality of care goes, is it better to have government run or privately run. Ideologues don't like these questions
 
taxslave

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Serryah said:
Wrong - you can tell sexual parts by what's in your pants, gender is NOT a physical appearance. Two separate things.
Correct, being Trans isn't a choice.
First off, it's son, not daughter. Unless the father's actions is putting the child in danger, which he is. By continuing to belittle and degrade his son, he is ignoring the mental health of his child and endangering his child. In that case, the child's welfare DOES fall under that of the state.
Son. And you are a complete effing MORON to think words cannot be violent. Words can indeed be violent and cause as much, if not more, damage than something physical.
Son. And when those words emotionally abuse his child, yeah, the court can do that, too, although IMO the court should remove the child from the father's care.
And what about the son's right not to be outed to a society that has assholes like you who will degrade or even be violent to him, just because he's trans? It's not the public's business what gender he is, until he's of age to determine who can and can't know.
Son did not sue the father. And the decision preventing him from being involved in the raising of his son was obviously warranted from what it said in the article.
I know you don't have the mental capacity to really understand what being Trans is but that doesn't mean you get to go all free transphobic on a fourteen year old kid. He's got enough of this from his father.
Click to expand...
You should read the article. It is a daughter.
 
H

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
3
36
taxslave said:
This isn't health care. Sending the kid to a shrink to figure out why she thinks she is a he might be cassified as health care spending.
Click to expand...
This is healthcare which is why the trial featured the testimony of a number of medical doctors rather than the insane ravings of a white natty climate change denier.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom