I have some problems with this law as it is not about getting anyone off the road
who is drunk or otherwise. As some know I have lost a brother to a drunk driver
and I have a grand son who it injured for life because of a drunk. That being said
I see right through this law.
The people who are .08 and over are still driving, and they continue to drive regardless.
The law states that at .08 you are impaired, it doesn't say .05 for criminal purposes,
therefore this is for government popularity so they claim they are doing something
when in fact they are not.
The other problem is the fact that the law strikes at the very heart of our democratic
rights. It does not matter you have a right to defend yourself in a constituted court.
Has anyone thought about the fact that a hired murderer has the recourse of law while
someone who at .05 is not allowed to defend them self. Don't people see something
wrong with that?
Alberta knows the law was partially struck down but like the BC Government they are
too arrogant to care.
who is drunk or otherwise. As some know I have lost a brother to a drunk driver
and I have a grand son who it injured for life because of a drunk. That being said
I see right through this law.
The people who are .08 and over are still driving, and they continue to drive regardless.
The law states that at .08 you are impaired, it doesn't say .05 for criminal purposes,
therefore this is for government popularity so they claim they are doing something
when in fact they are not.
The other problem is the fact that the law strikes at the very heart of our democratic
rights. It does not matter you have a right to defend yourself in a constituted court.
Has anyone thought about the fact that a hired murderer has the recourse of law while
someone who at .05 is not allowed to defend them self. Don't people see something
wrong with that?
Alberta knows the law was partially struck down but like the BC Government they are
too arrogant to care.