I think some of the most damning stuff in the Case against the official theory is the magic passport of one of the hijackers that survived the plane crash, raging fire, 3 tower collapse and ended up conveniently on the street to be picked up by clean up crews. And the fact that it is claimed that some of the men claimed to be involved in the hijackings are allegedly still alive, never having been involved in anything of the sort in the first place. Not to mention WTC Building #7 was never hit by a plane! only experienced minor fires! And yet collapsed all the same? And it is remarkable that all 3 fell just like a controlled demolition, imploding in a straight line to the ground, including building 7 which collapsed for no good reason having sustained no where near the damage of the towers. This sort of thing would never happen in the states would it? Just ask JFK and the magic bullet that had a built in remote control!!!!!
I'm strongly starting to suspect the conspiracy theorists are using this whole situation to bolster their egos. they always say things like "it''s very easy really if you'll only think outside the box" and "obviously you can only understand this if you arent a capitalist sheep". they even invented the term sheeple, or at least made it popular.
I've said something like this before:
It's a sad example of the state of the world that rather than see the tragedy and learn from it, people would rather bolster their own egos and use it as a political tool to posture and build websites about
HTML Code:(external - login to view)
Here is a quote from a NYFD fireman about WTC. 7. WTC 7 was wrecked by falling debris. The whole interview is on that link from the men that were there and not the CC Conspiracy nuts.
"A little north of Vesey I said, weíll go down, letís see whatís going on. A couple of the other officers and I were going to see what was going on. We were told to go to Greenwich and Vesey and see whatís going on. So we go there and on the north and east side of 7 it didnít look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didnít look good. (external - login to view)
Ain't that the truth about the passport!
There have been instances of skyscapers burning for over 24 hrs and still didnt collapse.
In may of 2001, the exiled leader of Afganistan, was told by the us gov that they will be at war with his country, come oct....and thats on record with the bbc...wonder how "they" knew
Why No One Could Have Predicted The Collapse Of WTC 7
Building was specifically designed to have floors removed without collapsing
infowars.net/articles/march20...07BBC_WTC7.htm (external - login to view)
in NZ we learned about jfk murder b4 it happened.....someone screwed up on the time diff
That was a display of blithering incompetence, stupidity and multiple compounded errors in judgement. You really think the same people were capable of pulling off 9/11? You're obviously beyond any hope of evidence and logic on this subject.
Then how do you explain Iraq being completely in ruins and the oil being in America hands, which incidently were the reasons for the attack in the first place. Or are you telling me you believe freedom and democracy were the goals? I'm not the one ignoring logic in this case Dex.
Its the oil.................Quote has been trimmed, See full post:
Why Are We At War? It's the Oil, Stupid!
By Joseph Clifford, JAMESTOWN, Rhode Island - Please see The Ultimate 9/11 information Archive on one website located at http://www.propagandamatrix.com/archiveprior_knowledge.html The Russians got into their Vietnam right after we got out of ours? Isn't that strange?
We supported Bin Laden and the Taliban for years, and viewed them as Freedom fighters against the Russians. Isn't that strange?
As late as 1998 the US was paying the salary of every single Taliban official in Afghanistan? Isn't that strange?
There is more oil and gas in the Caspian Sea area than in Saudi Arabia, but you need a pipeline through Afghanistan to get the oil out. Isn't that strange?
UNOCAL, a giant American Oil conglomerate, wanted to build a 1-000-mile long pipeline from the Caspian Sea through Afghanistan to the Arabian Sea. Isn't that strange?
UNOCAL spent $10 billion on geological surveys for pipeline construction, and very nicely courted the Taliban for their support in allowing the construction to...
Well, she was at my door this morning!
Tsk, tsk, ITN!
The point is, though, that you cannot "prove" something that didn't happen when the theory is constructed from a series of events that could have a thousand explanations.
But to think that war was initiated so Unocal could build a pipeline across a mountainous central Asian country defies belief for anyone with even an inkling of the oil business. It is so f****** inconsequential relative to the costs borne out of war.
But context and perspective are usually lacking from the conspiracists.