No one is demonizing Israel...
Neat, you get caught lying again, and you jump to Biblical references and other assorted nonsense.
Interesting standards.
At least I can jump to an appropriate one, one that even a Jew should be able to understand, but it looks like you both have had the same form of corrupt teachings.
I don't mind trolls like you but HF do you have to be a stuck record with one tiny line to throw out.
Oh yeah anything else gets thrown back in your face when shown to be an intentional attempt to pass off, wait for it, a falsehood.
Shooting unarmed civilians is morally repugnant, no wonder the IDF is held in high esteem by you.
Didn't they ban your *** for that deception about an invasion by Saddam and the border incident some 6 months later, might be part of the reason this site has the rep it does.
Back to calling me a Jew again I see.
Why would I do that...
... we cleared that up some time ago.
I was pointing out that it was from the Torah and short and not part of any 'complex passage' so a Jew most likely understands it.
That doesn't mean it would be understood by you.
I doubt the Jews would even want you, their standards may not be very high these days but that would still not include you as being a viable candidate.
I have lots of Jewish friends back in Montreal. They think I'm crazy, but a really cool guy.
They would say that to a goy who blindly parrots what they say.
Is that why IO had to explain to you that the Bible was based on the Torah and not the other way around as you claimed?
I'm going to assume you mean (I). The Torah has followers that don't use the NT to complete the story those 5 books start. Not the smartest move if you want to claim to understanding God. That also means taking in their view on things via various writings outside of the Scriptures themselves is not the smartest thing to do. A Jew doing it I can understand that, but you claim no affiliation to that group, so that just makes you a parrot with no real independent thinking, just part of the 'collective'.
You're in the wrong thread again.
I parrot anti war jingoisms, ....
Like this one?
Quote has been trimmed, See full post:
The Palestinians will change the rules of the game and will lose if they proceed with their bid to become an observer state at the U.N., an Israeli diplomatic source suggested on Saturday. In response to the possibility that the Palestinian Authority will submit a request to the U.N. to upgrade its status to that of a non-member observer state, the source said, "They will change the rules of the game and they will emerge with less." Israel has been working with the U.S. and Europe to convince the Palestinians no to pursue the initiative. Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz (Likud) said recently in closed-door discussions that he had made it clear to PA Prime Minister Salam Fayyad and other senior Palestinian officials that Israel could cease its cooperation with the authority, and even block the transfer of funds to it, if it went ahead with its unilateral request. "The Palestinian initiative at the U.N. is more dangerous than rocket attacks from Gaza," Steinitz remarked.
Israel Hayom | 'PA bid at UN more dangerous than missiles from Gaza'
I've never parroted that.
You will be if you want to keep your Jewish friends, just ask Judge Goldstone.
So does anyone think that Hamas is split between hardline- no peace- and those that want in the future a viable state and peace with Israel. And I am not referring to a 3 state agreement - Gaza- West Bank- Israel-
So does anyone think that Hamas is split between hardline- no peace- and those that want in the future a viable state and peace with Israel. And I am not referring to a 3 state agreement - Gaza- West Bank- Israel-
"a negotiating table"
How about the ICC in the Hague?
Actually this could be the beginning of some serious breakthrough changes.....
I would support a Truth and Reconciliation Tribunal, where telling the truth gets you amnesty.
That's how South Africa moved past their version of Apartheid.
Then you would have to bring in a lot of important people in many Muslim countries. From Qatar, Saudi, Iran to name a few.
Bad idea - But I noted your misuse of the term apartheid as it does not apply to Israel. Why use inflammatory terms- It does not lead to a positive discussion.
UN 181 more or less created that court to field complaints that arise from the implementation of that document, the ICC is the only place it could be deemed as being fully illegal wiping out the Israeli Gvernment but giving the ones there now protection from becoming displaced persons and I'm quite sure the world would be quite comfortable with the Holy Land being a place where Jews could practice their religion in safety but without taking on the running of the country.
Then you would have to bring in a lot of important people in many Muslim countries. From Qatar, Saudi, Iran to name a few.
Bad idea - But I noted your misuse of the term apartheid as it does not apply to Israel. Why use inflammatory terms- It does not lead to a positive discussion.
