This that.What "that" are you referring to?
Ford knows that Dale was not in his backyard, he knows that he didn't take any photos of his kids, yet he clearly lies and claims that Dale did these things.
This that.What "that" are you referring to?
Yes, Ford knows that, but he's still allowed to offer his own opinions of the event in an off the cuff interview.This that.
Ford knows that Dale was not in his backyard, he knows that he didn't take any photos of his kids, yet he clearly lies and claims that Dale did these things.
Or just an opinion.
I have kids, whether they're in the house or not, if I caught someone hanging over my fence with a camera, there'd be an issue, and my first thoughts would be about my kids.
Negative attention doesn't necessarily mean his reputation has been damaged.
So your claim will have to be proven in court.
Ya, so?
Hanging over the fence, camera in hand, kids in the house or wherever, I've seen stronger cases with clearer intent tossed.
Like I said, I wish Dale the best of luck.
This that.
Ford knows that Dale was not in his backyard, he knows that he didn't take any photos of his kids, yet he clearly lies and claims that Dale did these things.
Yes, Ford knows that, but he's still allowed to offer his own opinions of the event in an off the cuff interview.
What he inferred should make for some interesting legal babble. I can't wait.
BTW Goob's, ruffy has already convicted Ford of libel, and other criminal acts, so you're barking up the wrong tree if you're looking for objectivity.
Settle down dude, you're gunna stroke out.
Look, I get it, you've convicted Ford across the board, you're obsessed, you're a hack, whatever, get over it.
My opinion is, Dale has a pretty good challenge ahead of him, and that's based on being a plaintiff in a stronger case.
Dude, you've made up your own libelous nonsense about Ford. This isn't a conversation I'm willing to waste time on, other than to either annoy or mock you. You aren't objective.Lol, same old same old. As soon as you are challenged, you just resort to personal attacks.
Quite similar to another person we are talking about here.
Dude, you've made up your own libelous nonsense about Ford. This isn't a conversation I'm willing to waste time on, other than to either annoy or mock you. You aren't objective.
Your hate for Ford shines through.
And no, you haven't challenged me, I know what happened, I know what he said, I know what libel and slander cases look like. I wish dale all the luck.
All you're doing is parroting the same stupid stuff over and over for some reason. I didn't say anything you said wasn't true other than what remains to be proven. So I can only gather that you're to emotional about the topic to be objective.
Thus we come full circle, you aren't worth anymore of my time, than pure entertainment.
Grow up, get a life, smoke a joint, have a drink, turn off the puter and go get some fresh air, whatever it takes to clear the anger from your head.
No doubt, you're obsession is to strong.
Media Malpractice: "With the full support of the Star, I will stay on the city hall beat while pursuing this action."
Fabulous. :lol:
So much for any financial damages, lol.Media Malpractice: "With the full support of the Star, I will stay on the city hall beat while pursuing this action."
Fabulous. :lol:
Well for one, that his professional reputation has been damaged.So what does the reporter have to prove?
That at the time of the incident, what he sated is what he believed.What will Ford use as a defense...
LOL, you go right on thinking the law is black and white and what you read in the papers is how this case will be fought and won.So you are accusing me of some special kind of libel that doesn't involve saying things that are not true?
Lol, I'm starting to think that your grasp of what libel is is about as tenuous of your understanding of the constitution as demonstrated in other threads.
LOL, you go right on thinking the law is black and white and what you read in the papers is how this case will be fought and won.
It makes one of us look like a fool, I'm sure I know who you think that is, lol.
Some countries are like that-of course since the usual suspects here have never left the double wide they wouldn't know.It would be a pretty bad precedent for Ford if he found out that he could get rid of any reporter that he thinks is too hard on him just be tossing a bit of libel their way....
Are you really so daft that you think this is the first time you've discussed Ford on this forum?The quote is about you claiming that I made libelous comments and claiming that you never said anything that I said wasn't true. Can you explain how that makes sense?
Flossy, Mhz, EAO live in a double wide?Some countries are like that-of course since the usual suspects here have never left the double wide they wouldn't know.
That at the time of the incident, what he sated is what he believed.
Why do you argue law when you haven't a clue about it?Even if that was a valid defense...
Are you really so daft that you think this is the first time you've discussed Ford on this forum?