This proves the mountains are not from the earth

[eanassir]

Nor are you, kind sir.... Even the great Koran (or however one chooses to spell it) can't put Pandora back in its box. Rocks reveal their secrets. Gods never do....

Contemplate and Poder on the Quran ayat and its interpretation

You, and Dexter and many people here do not study the Quran, and they claimed reading some of its translations.

I challenge you all that you have not studied the Glorious Quran of God; in stead you took its revelations for jest and ridicule and mockery which is not the reaction of any wise man.

Out of your pride (and the pride over the Quran like that of Satan over Adam will prove low and not any high way of thinking).

To all what I have told you, you did not go and take it seriously:

Examples:
The planets are inhabited : There is life on the planets (including Mars): there is water, and atmosphere and every essential of life.

Most of the Mountains came from the outer space in the early formation of the earth and the planets, and these meteorites carried life to the earth and the other planets from the past planets that were destroyed in the past Doomsday.

The rain is the molten snow particles by the effect of the cloud and not from the cloud itself.

The creation of Adam and Eve :Man (Adam) was created on a mountain on Earth, and there were three human races created in the same manner before Adam.

The Way in Which Some Animals and Man Were Created ​

I Saw with My Own Eyes
God creates (and still He creates) a large number of species of animal and plant, by creating a male and a female out of the organic decayed substance; and the theory of Evolution is wrong.

Uncovering of the Hidden Truth
There is another ethereal world beside this material world, and we shall go to it when we die, and the death is only the transmission of man from this material world to the ethereal world of spirits.
Features of souls after death

And the Quran is full of a large number of subjects and horizons of thinking and contemplation and wisdom and knowledge.
As God - be glorified - said in the Quran 54: 17
وَلَقَدْ يَسَّرْنَا الْقُرْآنَ لِلذِّكْرِ فَهَلْ مِن مُّدَّكِرٍ

The explanation:
(And, truly, We have made [the reciting of] the Quran easy for admonition.
Is there, then, any that will receive admonition?)


quran-ayat.co

 

[lone wolf]

Perhaps our confusion may be found in your own interpretations of the Quaran.

I have actually witnessed the birth of rock similar to that found in your mystery regions of the Grand Canyon.

 

[darkbeaver]

God created the matter from The ether.

That is my understanding. Of course that makes electricity God. Which makes perfect sense to me because it is without doubt the most powerful and intelligent force there is. God literally pushes the blood through our veins.

 

[Dexter Sinister]

In spite of that you are not expert in geology.

I know a good deal more about it than you do, I have a university degree with a major in the subject and many years working for an exploration and mining firm in the company of many accomplished geologists and geophysicists. I know what I'm talking about, and I know that your claims are preposterous.

 

[MHz]

So, was the Canadian Shield done in 'one pour' ? (1 million years+ time-frame would be more than acceptable)
Oldest Known Ocean Crust Found on Greenland

The place I start having 'doubts' is with the amount of ereosion that is supposed to have happened, some sources have the Rockies eroding down my 2 miles, wouldn't that have to be close to how much the Shield has eroded also (or close at is is so dense that it would resist weathering very well)

 

[lone wolf]

Not really - all the while the Pacific Plate keeps pushing west North America upward. How do you suppose coal made it up to Tumbler?

 

[Dexter Sinister]

So, was the Canadian Shield done in 'one pour' ? (1 million years+ time-frame would be more than acceptable)

No, obviously not, it shows signs of complex reworking and many tectonic and orogenic events over many millions of years.

 

[eanassir]

I know a good deal more about it than you do, I have a university degree with a major in the subject and many years working for an exploration and mining firm in the company of many accomplished geologists and geophysicists. I know what I'm talking about, and I know that your claims are preposterous.

Are the theories of geologists, about this this difference in layers, very certain and final?
How can you be sure scientifically that some mountains at least did not land on Earth in the past?
And how can any scientist assert (such difference in the layers timing) is not because such mountains were originally not from the Earth?

 

[darkbeaver]

"And man created god in his own image", Mark Twain.
Truer words have never been spoken.

The Creator is unknowable to such finite beings as humans. We are a barbaric race of inconspicuous dust floating in an infinite Universe. Thinking the the Creator gives us a second thought is an ego trip of biblical (or Quranic) proportions.

Cliffy you are being naughty the god you are denying undenibly permits you to communicate that heresy over this here medium and boils water for you any time you pray at the countertop outlet. Lighten up on the humans we're not all bad to the bone. Anyway electro magnetic plasma created everything and runs the whole show.

 

[eanassir]

That is my understanding. Of course that makes electricity God. Which makes perfect sense to me because it is without doubt the most powerful and intelligent force there is. God literally pushes the blood through our veins.

The electricity is only a servant of God.

 

[Dexter Sinister]

Are the theories of geologists, about this this difference in layers, very certain and final?

They're as certain and final as any scientific theory can be. The evidence is clear that mountains are formed by processes observably at work on the earth, not by things falling from the sky.

 

[darkbeaver]

Are the theories of geologists, about this this difference in layers, very certain and final?
How can you be sure scientifically that some mountains at least did not land on Earth in the past?
And how can any scientist assert (such difference in the layers timing) is not because such mountains were originally not from the Earth?

Matter to build mountains does come here from space. You first have to ionize the mountain and deliver it via the e field. I think they say the sun is the nearest quarry for off planet stone and it has the best ionizer. Don't ask me about the details, have faith.

 

[eanassir]

They're as certain and final as any scientific theory can be.

This is obviously wrong; no scientist can claim he is certain about such things that happened since a very long time.
The most of what they can say: they can say: We think it is most probably so and so.

To confirm this, we may notice that there are many theories.

The evidence is clear that mountains are formed by processes observably at work on the earth, not by things falling from the sky.

If we know that rocks fell and are falling every now ant then, who can then say: such mountains certainly did not fall from the space in the early period of the earth and the planets formation.

Moreover, see the Moon mountains: no water, no atmosphere there for the erosion and other factors (apart from the heat and coldness) to take place there on Moon, so how can you explain such huge mountains on Moon, which is full of craters and stones.

 

[lone wolf]

As the moon cooled, its surface wrinkled

 

[darkbeaver]

They're as certain and final as any scientific theory can be. The evidence is clear that mountains are formed by processes observably at work on the earth, not by things falling from the sky.

Certainly that is correct we see hot steaming mountains popping up out of the sea quite often. Mountains are not cold formed of course. The matter does sort of fall from the sky though.

 

[eanassir]

As the moon cooled, its surface wrinkled

This can be one factor, in addition there are many trenches and fissures on Moon because of the contraction of its surface after it cooled.
Moreover, it cannot be denied that the meteorite and comet falling on Moon is in large number leading to the appearance of hundreds of thousands of craters on Moon.
lunar mountains

The journey to the moon

 

[Cliffy]

This can be one factor, in addition there are many trenches and fissures on Moon because of the contraction of its surface after it cooled.
Moreover, it cannot be denied that the meteorite and comet falling on Moon is in large number leading to the appearance of hundreds of thousands of craters on Moon.
lunar mountains

The journey to the moon

If your theory held any water, the Earth would look like the moon.

Cliffy you are being naughty the god you are denying undenibly permits you to communicate that heresy over this here medium and boils water for you any time you pray at the countertop outlet. Lighten up on the humans we're not all bad to the bone. Anyway electro magnetic plasma created everything and runs the whole show.

I never said the Creator was malevolent or that humans were bad. I believe in the possibility of a Creator but that it really doesn't give a shyte about our petty wants and needs or what we believe or do. Humans are completely insignificant to the Universe and they invented their gods because of their insecurity about their insignificance.

 

[MHz]

This can be one factor, in addition there are many trenches and fissures on Moon because of the contraction of its surface after it cooled.
Moreover, it cannot be denied that the meteorite and comet falling on Moon is in large number leading to the appearance of hundreds of thousands of craters on Moon.
lunar mountains

The journey to the moon

I thought the near side of the moon had those large outflows because the tidal lock meant the forces were only on the side facing the earth. The far side would have undergone 'shrinking' as the mass of the ball shifted to the 'other-side' The shrinkage would show up as making it appear that it was impacted more often per sq mile than what actually took place.

No, obviously not, it shows signs of complex reworking and many tectonic and orogenic events over many millions of years.

Since that is such a cool pic ........ if an object of the right weight and velocity impacted the center of Hudson's Bay that it could liquify the whole bay could the resulting 'sloshing' allow for many overruns of lave with the bay being the source of the (multiple) flooding. After millions of years it settled down and has remained fairly stable ever since.

This pic below is easy to see how some of the pieces of land (can) fit together Can you see that 'shifting' starting at Hudson's Bay and the forces that created the shield could also force whole sections of land to spread apart over very long periods of time, Faster at the start and slowing down as the lava cooled.

 

[Retired_Can_Soldier]

Mountains from outer space. How Doctor Who-ish.

 

[Dexter Sinister]

This is obviously wrong; no scientist can claim he is certain ...

You're arguing against a claim I didn't make. Read it again. And see if you can find a first year university geology text book from western Europe or North America, it'll help you understand how wrong you are, and why, if you can get past rejecting it out of hand because it's not consistent with your 1400 year old Quran and al-Hilly's ludicrous interpretations of its scientific content.