YouCanJerk said:Joy Behar, the 300 pound blob of cellulite welcomed the only wrestler who gave wrestling a bad name, and the symbol of Minnesotan stupidity,
You have an obsession with fat women, don't you?
YouCanJerk said:Joy Behar, the 300 pound blob of cellulite welcomed the only wrestler who gave wrestling a bad name, and the symbol of Minnesotan stupidity,
I think I got it now....It's OKay and politically correct to call all Christians bible thumpers and child molesters .....but saying that muslims attacked on 9/11 is not, unless you add the word "fanatic" or "terrorist" even though the administration shied away from calling them terrorists for almost two years preferring to call them simple criminals and mirandizing them.:roll:
First of all, Avro, I am YUKONJACK, you lazy slagger, who finds it too hard to peck out "YUKON".
Secondly who in the Hell is Kevin James and why should I care?
You have an obsession with fat women, don't you?
No I don't. My wife, the love of my life is also quite a bit on the "sturdy" side, so I have no problem with ladies with weight problems, real or perceived.
However I DO have problems with those heavy ladies who are ignorant and ugly, like Joy Behar and Whoopie Goldberg. Or hypocrites who preach about nutrition from their 250 lbs. perch, like Michelle Obama.
If you didn't have an issue with fat women, you wouldn't feel the need to make an issue of it when you disagree with someone.
Which you do quite frequently.
Little boys are raped by Catholics.
However, the only ones who performed terrorist acts based on their religion, political affiliation, sexual preference and/or race, with the possible exception of the Unibomber, influenced by Al Gore's ramblings (you know, the religion of Global Warming) and Timothy McVeigh, influenced by the religion of atheism.
TenPenny, the fact that I disagree with the above-mentioned trio of liberal worthies has nothing to do with their body weight; more to the fact that their body weight is inversely proportional to their intellectual weight.
influenced by Al Gore's ramblings (you know, the religion of Global Warming) and Timothy McVeigh, influenced by the religion of atheism.
Not all muslims are terorists and that's a fact!
But not to forget these days that most if not all terorists are muslims!
So all political correctness aside, the U.S. ,on september 11th, was attacked by Muslims.... period!!
O'Reilly was right....
And wasn't, for example, Shock and Ah an act of terrorism. The invasion of those countries was an act of terrorism if you happened to live in those countries. They certainly didn't invade to liberate them. They were bombed back into the stone age so that they could be reconstructed in the west's image and of course to exploit their resources.So, I guess the terrorist view that it is Christians attacking them through Afghanistan and Iraq is correct also. This a war between Christianity and Islam, not a war on terror.
Little boys are raped by Catholics.
Now then, I am no great fan of Glen Beck.......nor do I watch Fox News......but herein (from Tonington's link) is something much much more dangerous than one allegedly Beck-inspired looney with a gun............You forgot someone influenced by Glenn Beck's ramblings, Byron Williams.
Did Glenn Beck's rhetoric inspire violence? - CSMonitor.com
While we may agree to disagree about the role our citizens and our government should play in promoting social justice and the common good, there should be no disagreement about what constitutes integrity and professionalism and responsibility in discourse – even when allowing for and encouraging contending diverse opinions intelligently argued,” Tides founder and CEO Drummond Pike wrote. “This is not a partisan issue. It's an American issue. No one, left, right or center, wants to see another Oklahoma City.”
There can never be "agreement" on what constitutes acceptable speech........all speech is acceptable, up to the "yelling FIRE in a theatre" litmus test.
There can never be "agreement" on what constitutes acceptable speech........all speech is acceptable, up to the "yelling FIRE in a theatre" litmus test.
The left is constantly proving it does not understand the concept of liberty, especially in the realm of free speech.
You forgot someone influenced by Glenn Beck's ramblings, Byron Williams.
Did Glenn Beck's rhetoric inspire violence? - CSMonitor.com
Either one makes you a polarized zealot DaS, you know that. Seriously, come sit here in the middle, it's good for giggles.
This is very interesting. I did some quick research on what this is all about. It's amazing how many web sites and "news" outlets are stating matter of factly that Byron Williams was egged onto violence by Beck, when that is clearly not the case. I tried to find exactly what it was that Beck said that inspired violence...to no avail. Williams said himself that Beck was not the cause of his violence, and in fact was quoted as saying that Beck would never advocate violence. Yet google is rife with pieces that claim matter of factly that Beck incited the violence.
There is no "middle". To the extreme right wingers you are to the left therefore a lefty. To the extreme left wingers you are to the right therefore a righty. There is no middle, it is all a matter of perspective.