youtube politics Alex Jones Channel SUSPENDED HA HA HA HA

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
His free speech rights are being trashed with BULLSHIT because he has been exposing the criminally insane nazi communist globalist turds you free speech haters, trumphaters, and alex jones haters support.

Oh, high SPAM! Didn't see you LURKING THERE!

Read the IG report to get the facts? NO?
;)
Ah, not to worry! Obviously it was over your head.



Damn hitlary luvers!!! Oh well, follow the bouncing bean.
 

hifigadget

New Member
Aug 5, 2018
7
0
1
Leicester
I'm scared by this news. I don't know much about Spotify but Facebook and Youtube are absolutely left the biased company, even though their market is the whole world. I might sound like a selfish kid but these social media sites became our voice in this world which is bad because like you said, they're all private companies which mean they can do whatever they want like "you either one of us or you don't have a place here.". I don't know what happened that high school shooting but there is one thing in my mind no one can change; that kid looks like omen or demon mofo and acts like the self-righteous prick. I too rarely watch Alex Jones but people can understand the difference when he rants about stuff without evidence and when he talks about truth.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
There have been a lot more lies about jones than from Jones, That's for sure. There are courts. Let them speak, because so far they have been in JONE's favour.

Oh wait, the trumphaters don't DO COURTS very well, do they?

Any russian collusion convictions yet? How about that IG report?

This is the CORPORATE DICTATORSHIP in action - anyone who supports that is a nazi/commie thug.


Geez, the sun for example, has posted more messed up untrue and biased articles than Jones ever has.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Free Speech is saying that Sandy Hook was a hoax?


I find it hard to believe that even a troglodyte like you would subscribe to that nonsense.
A better example of (your term) 'free speech' is taking his 1/2 hour segment where he closely examines some released video that seems to show some 'anomalies' and reduce it to calling him a liar.

I can also show you more vids that cover the same questions that are dated before AJ was on the scene. The attention they get is to just be put on the ignore list and time will erase their thoughts.
AJ also did some updates to the original vid so the story does not end where you left it. Rather than AJ being the deceptive one here it is you that is showing you will use selective items that are not the whole truth by a long shot to justify your 'immoral attitude' over some person based on him being an 'immoral person'. Part of free speech is also defending your position in court and I have to assume he has a few lawyers lurking in the shadows anytime he is saying something. You seem to have missed a few memos is the kind way of calling you out on your intentional lie. Educate yourself before posting, it also saves me from your troll spittle getting all over everything you comment on.



I'm thinking his gunshot analysis of Vegas had a lot to to do with his channel being erased. Good reason not to use them as an archive for anything. 404 error with the click of a few icons. It seems more subscription based and mainstream is starting to require a membership just to read their articles. (ie Globe and Mail)



http://www.real.video/

Illuminaughty
And the porno channel has what to do with AJ? (unless it is from 'battle bots and then 'let er rip')
 

justlooking

Council Member
May 19, 2017
1,312
3
36
and private companies must publish it?

people who hate democracy seldom understand it.


Whenever a full on alt-leftist starts trying to hide his love of suppression of speech behind the 'private company' monopoly,


you just know lots of squirming and whining is coming.


It's an open platform... or it isn't.


If you support the 'private company', you also support the Christian bakers, and Muslim taxi drivers not picking up the blind with a dog.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
It’s called free speech. He is allowed to lie if he wants to.
Really? The Mainstream showed a few years back that they were under no obligation to publish the truth. That basically means it is the welfare of the advertisers pocketbooks that is the important part to business of 'public news'. That's fine but I think that takes away their right to charge us any money to get those reports that are promoted as being something they are not. I can understand a fee to be applied to being told the truth about something but I do not believe we are required to pay the same, or even more, to be told a lie that prevents us from taking the right course of reaction in response to some action already in motion. Its similar to telling somebody being raped to smile as it is affecting the rapist ability to fully enjoy the moment.
The part that makes it more than a little vile is the ones claiming they have the right to lie to us for the benefit of others are also quite adamant about us not having the right to lie to them under any circumstances, or complain about finding out something is a lie when the effects cannot be undone even if there was a will to do so. You should be able to smell the stench of the hippocracy by now Walnut unless you are neck deep and loving every minute of it.
Every successful coup was started and finished by a military in revolt. More often that not it was over the order to kill its own citizens for complaining how they are being abused.


Alex should 'dive on the sword' on this one and plead no contest to 'knowingly lying to 'the audience' in order to pacify some people and sell a few bottles his brand of snake oil'. (I guess the one that controls temper tantrums is still a work in progress. Ozone can be produced for about $10 in used hardware, the power is about the same amount per year)

The sheer volume of class action lawsuits against mainstream media for promoting a lie and calling it the truth either means they are part of the lie (not good when the audience is a hostile mob with pitchforks) or they were duped and now their eyes are open so they would become witnesses rather than victims. (live to lie another day)

By the time a decade had passed all the names and details of how it worked would be part of court records and the 'fines' would cost somebody dearly as well as put others in a position to 'fix things up using an almost unlimited budget'. Do it at a global level through a functioning UN and you have a 'soap opera' that would be tuned in by the world for 20 years is lots of charges were laid using video evidence so the audience doesn't fall asleep.
 

justlooking

Council Member
May 19, 2017
1,312
3
36
Really? The Mainstream showed a few years back that they were under no obligation to publish the truth. That basically means it is the welfare of the advertisers pocketbooks that is the important part to business of 'public news'. That's fine


Except for the CBC, obviously.





but I think that takes away their right to charge us any money to get those reports that are promoted as being something they are not. I can understand a fee to be applied to being told the truth about something but I do not believe we are required to pay the same, or even more, to be told a lie that prevents us from taking the right course of reaction in response to some action already in motion. Its similar to telling somebody being raped to smile as it is affecting the rapist ability to fully enjoy the moment.


That's the fun of youtube, it's free.











no contest to 'knowingly lying to 'the audience' .


Got any proof ?
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
I was pointing to him pleading guilty even if he wasn't as it should result in a flood of class action lawsuits against the mainstream media as they openly brag about lying to a group of people that are paying them money for 'the truth'. I can break it down even more but that would involve breaking the crayons out and I prefer not to go there just yet.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Yet he is right much more often than you are...
:)
with your...ummmm....memes...but that's why you HATE him so much.
 

hifigadget

New Member
Aug 5, 2018
7
0
1
Leicester
I am not an Alex Jones fan- but YouTube, Googlegle[/B], apple, Spotify, etc should not be permitted to ban people just because they disagree with their politics.. that is anti-free Santi-democracymocracy and pro totalitarianism. google is also developing censored search engine 4 China..