Yeah Colpy, this one seems to be aiming the law at a person it wasn't intended for. maknig an example for pedophiles out of someone who truly doesn't seem to be one, seems over the top. It seems like one that needs to be found guilty, yes, but at 20 years? Even 12 years JLM seems excessive.
Perhaps- I'm not in favour of Molly Coddling these A$$holes. :smile:
Maybe they should focus their resources on the sickos who publish books on why it's okay to have sex with children, just sayin.Ludicrous.
Just ludicrous.
The kid needs a couple of solid kicks in the arse and an apology tour to every parent of every child in the class. Additional kicks to be applied as needed...
Then it needs to be forgotten.
My God we've gotten off-track.
NAMBLA would be good place to start.Maybe they should focus their resources on the sickos who publish books on why it's okay to have sex with children, just sayin.
He showed the children clearly. He won't be convicted but he sure as **** will be paying cash out to the parents for the rest of his life.so unless all those children are on Youtube, how could they possibly be affected?
Ludicrous.
Just ludicrous.
The kid needs a couple of solid kicks in the arse and an apology tour to every parent of every child in the class. Additional kicks to be applied as needed...
Then it needs to be forgotten.
My God we've gotten off-track.
The point is that whether you sexually victimize a child, or just create art that LOOKS like you sexually victimize a child, you're equally guilty in the eyes of the law. This is how they prevent a steady influx of cartoon child porn, etc.
How old is the average Anime character?sexually victimize a child, or just create art that LOOKS like you sexually victimize a child
but I don't get how you victimized a child when he's on a video where he's hearing proper lyrics. the video is edited after.
that's what I'm not getting.,
It plays to the fact that there are whole groups of pedophiles who get off on introducing kids to sex.... leaving porn mags out for them, letting them see them naked, telling them about sex, etc. A video all about kids watching you sit and talk about sex is porn for some people. And when it comes to portraying sexual victimization of children, even in that context, reality doesn't matter as far as the law is concerned. Portraying it is enough.