zoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooom
Women. Religion’s longest running victims.
- Thread starter French Patriot
- Start date
zoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooom
Do they feed female oxen only 70 % of what they feed male oxen.
Analogically speaking, that expresses what we pay women as compared to the higher pay we give men.
Regards
DL
Oh Canada, where have you gone. Too deep to the south I think.
Up where I come from, we spit out such garbage people.
Regards
DL
In all probability, I think most men would prefer it if women couldn't afford clothing.
:?P
It's them thar new fangled men I tell ya who have forgotten their duty to society and family.
That or us older ones have been really slow to start teaching our kids their duty to family and the equality of those in our nations.
Including women, --- if we all ever decide we want justice.
Regards
DL
That or us older ones have been really slow to start teaching our kids their duty to family and the equality of those in our nations.
Including women, --- if we all ever decide we want justice.
Regards
DL
back to our regularly scheduled programing
The only thing you can do when faced with someone who'se only interest is proselytizing.
Religions really has nothing to do with it.
Nature has made women weaker then men. Obviously this model helps our chances at survival if billions of years of evolution has bread us to be this way.
So yes. In some unfair natural way women are victim's of nature. Life is not fair. Get over it.
God Damn bleeding heart's
Nature has made women weaker then men. Obviously this model helps our chances at survival if billions of years of evolution has bread us to be this way.
So yes. In some unfair natural way women are victim's of nature. Life is not fair. Get over it.
God Damn bleeding heart's
To even things up nature has given women something that males always want and that they can always give.
Again if nature made us this way it means that it gives us our best chances at survival.
So , even though males are stronger. Females can establish some kind of control over them.
So it's not perfect. Who gives a ****
Just enjoy yourself while you're alive.
Modify this natural balance nature has struck between the two sex, with legislation, all you want.
Chances are you're messing around with things that we don't quite understand. And most likely will result in a massive decline of children born.
I'm willing to even state, that the homosexual community will grow directly linked to the amount of power given to women.
Again if nature made us this way it means that it gives us our best chances at survival.
So , even though males are stronger. Females can establish some kind of control over them.
So it's not perfect. Who gives a ****
Just enjoy yourself while you're alive.
Modify this natural balance nature has struck between the two sex, with legislation, all you want.
Chances are you're messing around with things that we don't quite understand. And most likely will result in a massive decline of children born.
I'm willing to even state, that the homosexual community will grow directly linked to the amount of power given to women.
It's a hypothesis. Not proven. But one worth doing a little research about.
What if it was?
It would make perfect sense
Nope, you misunderstand evolution. The only thing you can definitively say about any characteristic is that is does not reduce the odds of survival under the current circumstances. It is a random process. Any given characteristic may improve survival chances (like opposable thumbs), or be apparently inconsequential (like eye colour), or harm survival chances (like any number of characteristics that evolved and then died out). The only thing you can say is that a given characteristic is not so harmful that it died out. There are plenty of apparently negative characteristics that continue, despite their apparent contra-survival value.
Not on a evolution chain of infinity Tec. We are exactly the way we are meant to be.
Infinity? Please. Cro-magnons have been around 100,000 years. An evolutionary eyeblink.
Precisely. You're not talking evolution, you're just dressing up religion in scientific jargon. There is no "meant to be" in evolution.
wrong Philosophy is not Religions
& before cro-mangnons, we evolved from something. It takes a special kind of person to understand that.
Adding in the whole line of h o m o only gets you four million years or so. A slow eyeblink in evolutionary terms.
And "meant to be" ain't philosophy. It is asserting without a shred of evidence that there is a guiding principle or entity. That's religion.
Untill you understand infinity you won't understand what I'm sayin.
The only difference between our two views Tec, is I see myself and humanity as a force of nature. You see yourself as apart from nature.
Meant to be as. Guiding line of , every living things goal is to Survive and not go extinct. That's not religion. That's nature.
There is a guiding principle. It's survival and not going extinct.
Cause every living thing that did not prioritize those two things will go extinct over a period of infinity.
If those things where not our guidelines. Eventually all life would one day cease to exist
Only one word is required here.
It is not nature that is discriminating against women without a just cause. It is men.
True that men are a part of nature but it is not natural for a species to discriminate without just cause against half of the world that does not sport a dick.
Regards
DL
We are what we have made, not what some genocidal son murdering God has made.
He does not create as well as man can as can be seen by secular law that makes God's law look quite immoral.
Regards
DL
Wrong. Men don't discriminate against women we exercise dominance over all that is weaker then us trees animals women, everything even over other males.
Dominance gives us more chance at survival. It's our drive to be the best & to win.
Nature gave female a drive to find the alpha dominant male and reproduce.
And gave sex as a way to influence, and control him even though he is stronger.
And that is also because it gives us more chance at survival.
The real issue is we have a population of over 6 billion humans that have no idea or directions as to why in hell they are here, and what are the goals of life.
The purpose of life is to survive win , reproduce as many times before you die. Everything els is just a extension of those things or a distraction.
Dominance gives us more chance at survival. It's our drive to be the best & to win.
Nature gave female a drive to find the alpha dominant male and reproduce.
And gave sex as a way to influence, and control him even though he is stronger.
And that is also because it gives us more chance at survival.
The real issue is we have a population of over 6 billion humans that have no idea or directions as to why in hell they are here, and what are the goals of life.
The purpose of life is to survive win , reproduce as many times before you die. Everything els is just a extension of those things or a distraction.
Last edited:
