And after October 10 you may not have to resort to "strategic voting",to keep someone OUT of power - if the proportional vote referendum goes through, then everyone can properly vote with the knowledge that it WILL make a difference.
I think there is a good chance of them winning some seats, probably in the election. But I highly doubt they will ever form a government.
But then again, you're talking to the guy who predicted the Liberals would have a majority government by now. :lol:
Yeah notice the complacency with regard to that... what a disappointment.And after October 10 you may not have to resort to "strategic voting",to keep someone OUT of power - if the proportional vote referendum goes through, then everyone can properly vote with the knowledge that it WILL make a difference.
I could second this.The answer is NO! They are essentially a one issue party, and we already have the NDP, and they will never be elected either, thank God for small blessings! We do not need another party that wants bigger government, and wants government to be all things to all people, from birth to death. Essentially that is what the Liberals, NDP and and the Greens want. For a change, I want to be able to keep what little money I have, instead of giving it to government so it can be wasted on yet another new bureaucracy. I am sick and tired of supporting big government while the poverty rate in Canada continues to increase, and the rich get richer.
The Green Party USED to be a one-issue party, but ever since they started running candidates in every riding, they have a full policy platform that deals with taxes, crime, social issues, etc.
Rather than simply thoughtlessly spewing out the "party lines" of the traditional parties who think Canadians are too stupid or too busy to inform themselves, take the time to actually read the party platform.
You'll find that the Green Party no longer is a one-issue party, and even that the party is the one MOST like the good old fashioned Progressive Conservatives we grew to know and love (as opposed to the Republican-lite Reformers who now constitute the current Conservative Party of Canada that the media continue to misrepresent by calling them "Tories" which is lead by a man who seems to hate everything for which Canada has traditionnally stood).
maybe you haven't read the Green Part Policy yourself, it is ALL environment they pretend to write about something else, but everything they write leads back to the envronment.
"candidates in every riding" HA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
the 19-25 year old goofs that are still in school, don't count as candidates, they are place holders so there is someone to put up the bloody green party signs, ANYONE who believes the green party is anything like the Progressive Conservatives is smoking a little to much of the good stuff, and is WAY to gullible.
Oh the boring old fear mongering about the "SCARY" conservative party *YAAAAWN* time to get a new shtick there buddy.
Anyone who actually reads the green party platform will see that they are not a one issue party. As Niflmir says, there is a difference between one issue platform and a platform based on a singular principle. Marijuana party, one issue platform. Green party clearly is not. Though I doubt that detractors would actually read their platform before making such statements.
http://www.greenparty.ca/en/platform2006/green_party_vision
We will reform the tax system so that our spending better reflects the goals of a healthy and safe Canada.
Well, they won't be for everybody. They want to lower taxes for people under 45,000 a year, but that doesn't mean increasing it necessarily for say a 50,000 earner. The crux of their tax plan is to shift more taxes to corporations. Corporate taxes fell by 8% while corporate profit bloomed. Also to study different regimes say between us and other developed nations, to find a best of kind of thing.
They need to be more specific. That is one of the reasons I can't support them. The canidates I have heard and the platform I have read has always been very vague and unclear. That is relative to the big 3 parties which are certainly not the models of clarity either.