Why Young Americans Should Emigrate

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
Instead of accepting low-paid work or unpaid internships, young people should focus on globalizing themselves.


As Americans we can serve as warnings to other nations of what happens when neoliberal fanaticism runs its course. We have something to offer the world as a generation; we must offer the real picture of America, a nation divided under class and race. Here in Germany the people joke that things have become more Americanized, i.e. a deteriorating situation for for the working and middle classes.


In the 1950s and 1960s it was possible to attend a state college, work for minimum wage for a nominal amount of hours, and graduate with no debt. According to the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a minimum wage worker in 1979/1980 would have had to work 254 hours to pay tuition to attend a four-year public institution. As of 2010 a minimum wage worker would have to work 923 hours. That means instead of finding a summer job and working to avoid debt, many students need to find steady full-time jobs while studying, or graduate with massive debt. The class of 2013 has an average debt of $35,200 and a lot of them still attended state school.

Neoliberal reforms have been shoved down the throat of America since the '80s and had two large effects: lowering taxes on the rich and the destruction of organized labor, resulting in declining wages and worker protections. The Bureau of Labor Statistics stated in January that union membership fell 400,000 last year, to a 97-year low.

And it has been by design;

more


Get Out While You Can: Why Young Americans Should Emigrate | Alternet
 

tober

Time Out
Aug 6, 2013
752
0
16
Neoliberal reforms have been shoved down the throat of America since the '80s and had two large effects: lowering taxes on the rich and the destruction of organized labor, resulting in declining wages and worker protections. The Bureau of Labor Statistics stated in January that union membership fell 400,000 last year, to a 97-year low.

Neo-liberal isn't the problem, neo-conservatism is the author of anti-labour and anti-union corporate policies. But how typical of the US r/w to blame the other side. Lower education standards in red states don't help because uneducated people are easier for corporations to systematically mislead. They just cannot recognize some really obvious bullsh!t when they hear it. Neocons are anti the working stiff, not "neo-liberals" (whatever neo-liberal means).

Responsible corporate affairs recognize that being anti-labour attacks a good company's biggest asset, its work force. Responsible labour leaders recognize that the company is the goose laying the golden egg and it should not be irresponsibly savaged. For instance Jack Monroe, former CEO of the BC IWA, reputedly used to force shop stewards with aggressive ideas to rigorously defend their positions and prove to him that an idea was responsible. Too many people on both sides see labour standards as a war against each other instead of a cooperative opportunity to earn a living.
 
Last edited:

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
lmao... someone popped a gasket.

I wonder what parts of those low educated Red States the low grades are coming from? Urban areas perhaps? Blue controlled? You betcha!