Why are tea baggers white?
- Thread starter Avro
- Start date
"You just blindly accused me of being a bible thumper,"- I did not, what I said was "a lot of Cons are Bible thumpers"
" It's a blind accusation, with the expressed purposes of labeling me, or anyone that dares disagree, pigeon holing them and thus making it easy to dismiss their opinion."- That is total B.S., generally, I don't totally disagree with anyone, I respect most opinions and try to see where they are coming from. NOW let's you and I have a little thinking contest. You name the game.
" It's a blind accusation, with the expressed purposes of labeling me, or anyone that dares disagree, pigeon holing them and thus making it easy to dismiss their opinion."- That is total B.S., generally, I don't totally disagree with anyone, I respect most opinions and try to see where they are coming from. NOW let's you and I have a little thinking contest. You name the game.
I just asked you if you cared to question the math I used to prove Joey incorrect. Try starting there, if you want to make this a pissing contest.
And here you are JLM, a fine mastery, true to form of your beloved leader...
And so the saga continues.
Absolutely nothing based on fact, just blind accusations, that do nothing but remove the necessity of refuting what is placed before him, and by extension yourself, yet again.
Sycophants oft display a retarded image of appreciation.
Speaking of...
If only your minions would comply...
It would seem that it is I that has the ability to get under the skin of the gibbering caricatures, reducing them to pissing contest challenges and blind accusations.
Funny how those who truly are guilty, project that upon others.
You are into nebulous territory, Bear, it's virtually impossible to prove MOST opinions are incorrect as most of them are a mixture of truth and fiction, possibly even some of my own. Unless I'm 100% sure I'd rather just let it slide than stomp on the guy's head. I've NEVER thought of you personally as a Bible thumper. So you're "out to lunch".
:lol:
Well... in a word, yes...
I schooled his dear leader don't you know?
:roll:
Some sad things never change. It's just easier to attack the poster, then the post for some people. That way you don't have to do any real 'thinking' for yourself. Gawd forbid that happen.
Before you get into too many false premises, you should go back to Cliff's original remark.........."With 40% of whites and only 2% of Blacks voting Republican, I fail to see how SirJoseph is wrong about the Republican base being white conservatives."
You missed the point entirely when you said that 40% is not overwhelming...obviously you didn't give any thought to what Cliff was saying. (40 + 2= 42), 40/42= 95.238%, which I'd say is fairly overwhelming, so based on YOUR math on that one, Yep, I'm rarin' to go on any math contests too..........:lol::lol:
Quite so, JLM. It is difficult to see a black or a Hispanic face at a Tea Party rally. They tend to be overwhelmingly white, male and old.
The RNC Chairman, Michael Steele is aware of the problem, he would like to get more blacks interested in the Republican Party. However, given the visceral hatred many from the Republican base show towards the blacks, it remains a daunting task.
And if anything, the divide promises to get bigger, not smaller. Obama impeachment may very well be the big issue in the next year’s elections, the Republican base wants him impeached yesterday. So next year’s election could potentially get very ugly, with strong racial feeling on both sides.
I thought impeachment was the result of some dishonourable action. I wasn't aware that Obama had acted dishonourably, so I can only conclude that those who wish to impeach are a bunch of wingnuts.
That is true JLM; the constitution says ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’. But in practice, an impeachable offense is what the House says it is. Many people thought that Clinton’s offenses were not impeachable, more than 60% of Americans were consistently opposed to his impeachment.
But the House, in its partisan wisdom decided that Clinton had committed impeachable offenses. So if Republicans get control of the House and there is insurmountable pressure from the base, I can see House taking up the article of impeachment on some trumped up charge.
And they will succeed in impeaching Obama too; it only needs a simple majority in the House. Senate is of course, a totally different story.
That's not what Joey said. Seeing as you want to argue semantics, as I predicted, thank you for proving me right, btw.
Is what he said. He qualified his claim with a "," and "and". Not to mention his use of the word "overwhelmingly". All of which culminate in his post being incorrect and your version of math to be faulty.
I said that because 40% is not overwhelming, 87% is overwhelming.
:lol: Yes that was funny, because it makes no sense. Where did you learn math? Obviously the same place Joey learned critical thought.
Out of 932 register voters polled, 40% that identified as white were Republicans. 44% identified as white Democrats. As apposed to the "overwhelming" 87% black Democrats. Let's not forget that he qualified his assertion with male and old. Neither of which is supported by the stats provided. Especially since 31% of those polled identified as women, that lowers the margins even more.
Try again, stop using semantics and try critical thought or deductive reasoning. Until you do, you're not even in the same league, you're relegated to the same childish and foolish class as Joey's posts.
Last edited:
2% of blacks vote rep and 87% vote for dems and it's not everwhelming?
Huh? Who knew.:roll: