Why are tea baggers white?
- Thread starter Avro
- Start date
If the statement made was that there is an overwhelming, or disparaging gap between black and white Republican voters, then his assertion would be correct. But that is not what was said.
I have no doubt that Joey, nor his sycophants, nor you, have the objectivity, nor the cognitive skills to understand the error in his claim. Your views on this matter, are based solely on allegiance and dislike.
Obviously not you.
I reviewed that poll in my research. Had you read Joey's post, and understood his qualification, you would have understood that the poll you just provide is irrelevant. His assertion required a poll that broke down the voters into sub categories, including gender and age.
Again proving Niflmir's assertion aptly.
Unfortunately, your knack also includes hijacking the threads, Sir Ponce. The topic isn't about Republicans, politics, and your fanatical hatred of anything starting with the letter "R", it's about teabagging.
Urban dictionary says:
People, it seems to me that the OP is trolling by mentioning a word with multiple meanings and watching others leap to conclusions about what he was talking about.1. teabagger 4986 up, 688 down
buy a teabagger mugor cap or hoodie
multiple meanings. 1) one who carries large bags of packaged tea for shipment. 2) a man that squats on top of a womens face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as "teabagging" 3) one who has a job or talent that is low in social status 4) a person who is unaware that they have said or done something foolish, childlike, noobish, lame, or inconvenient. 5) also see "fagbag", "lamer", "noob"
Cannuck, you are obviously unaware that Leftists can not be racists.
They think along racial divides, they can even use racial stats to support their ideology. But only they and they alone have the ability to wield that kind of racial bias, without being racist...:roll:
Not a very scientific poll (only 351 respondents of people that attended or will attend a "tea party" event) but I think that it clearly states that they are overwhelmingly white (87%) *edit*, married, 'well off' and between the ages of 35 to 64 (which in some circles can be described as old). :roll:
What it also tells you is that not all "tea baggers" describe themselves as Republican, there's a large mix of Independents and Libertarians as well.
Source: Results
What it also tells you is that not all "tea baggers" describe themselves as Republican, there's a large mix of Independents and Libertarians as well.
Source: Results
Perhaps, Sir Ponce is one of those "people" who are the opposites of "Oreos". Urban dictionary defines an Oreo as a white person with black skin.
Anyway, he sure seems to make a big deal out of the differences between blacks and whites.
Which teabagger? I looked at the definitions and can't see any reason to suspect any particular type of person would practise any particular type of teabagging.
Oh. Well, I have no idea why those people are white.
I might mention that there are some black people that are against Obama, too. What difference do numbers and skin-color make except to people like Sir Ponce?
What is important is whether Obama has been a reasonable president or not. And as far as that goes, I have seen worse and I am pretty sure there have been better, but it's a bit premature to judge the guy's work this early in his game.
So once again, Sir Ponce hijacked a thread and sucked a pile of people into his game of bipartisan politics. I also noticed that although he didn't call anyone in particular a name, he blanket-labelled people as "gibbering caricatures, blind with rage", as if he's a credible and balanced judge of people.:roll:
I never paid any attention to S.J.s original, didn't even get into this until I read Cliff's post and took Cliff's quote of what S.J. said, only because I've found I can generally rely on what Cliff says- going by the 40% vs. 2%, 40 is overwhelming (assuming that 40 and 2 were the only numbers mentioned)- that I didn't check out.
Seems to me, quite a few young folks there as well as women. Kind of flies in the face of the argument that old white male Republicans are the people doing this.
I am aware that some blacks are against Obama, but in this case it is irrelevant. In this case the overwhemling amount of teas party prtesters are white. There must be some reason for this. Is it because of Barracks skin color? Not sure, but the U.S. does have a rough history on race relations.
Let me ask this question then, why is it these white Americans are afraid of government in a way blacks aren't? This based on the lack of interest by blacks and other ethnic groups in these particular protests.