I am not arguing whether or not the government actually sticks to the neutrality factor here but I also couldn't give a fukk about it either as long as sufficient revenue is used to fund the right projects.
... as long as sufficient revenue is used to fund the right projects.
No it doesn't.
Revenue Neutral has nothing to do with expenses or spend. Just revenue before and after.
But the Tardbase just needs to BELIEVE that it does regardless of facts.
Facts? Aren't you the guy that tried to use an article from The National Enquirer to support your position? You're the last person that should be talking about facts
You're silly.
Says the guy that used The National Enquirer to support his position...hehehe
Of course but when your cush job trolling the internet goes away , you might just be singing a different tune .I am not arguing whether or not the government actually sticks to the neutrality factor here but I also couldn't give a fukk about it either as long as sufficient revenue is used to fund the right projects.
Sorry I don't have one , so it is foreign to me .His kush job?