Where's the Thread on "George Floyd" ????

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
28,700
10,824
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Of course racism exists. Poor, suffering white people are brutally abused every day by them darkies.
Racism exists. It's real & it's endemic. George Floyd was Black, & now he's dead. The Protesters are of every race and creed and color. I even saw pictures of Mennonite & Amish Protesters (Their signs have the nicest hand writing on them) in Minnesota yesterday.



This has grown beyond Black & White & whatever, and seems to be more about Police brutality and Police abuse and Police accountability at this point. Right or wrong, that's how I'm perceiving things. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WApof-qiigA

During the last several days as Reporter (Omar Jiminez http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=da_X-u0CsQQ) was arrested or the Reporter (Kaitlin Rust http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGT167BLOSE) in Louisville getting repeatedly shot point blank with pepper rounds for trying to report the goings on across many cities in America during these protests are shining a light on a Police culture that has grown with its militarization over the last couple of decades.

You yourself have alluded to the dismal record of accountability regarding Police and prosecutions regarding their actions, from small crimes to murder by those that're suppose to uphold the law, & the Police with their actions are flaunting this fact. That's what I believe these protests have grown into. An example of this being these NYPD Vehicles that don't seem to come equipped with a reverse gear. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2v0dc44El5U

Militarization of Domestic Police Forces: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyf-dzaoqRs


 

Avro52

Time Out
Mar 19, 2020
3,635
5
36


 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
59,884
9,317
113
Washington DC
Racism exists. It's real & it's endemic. George Floyd was Black, & now he's dead.
Nope, I'm convinced by Jin's logic. The police have also abused white people, therefore there is no racism.

And we used to have indentured servitude in America, therefore there was no slavery.

White people killed other white people in North America, therefore there was no genocide.

And non-Jewish people were killed by the Nazis, therefore there was no Holocaust.
 

NZDoug

Council Member
Jul 18, 2017
1,894
31
48
Big Bay, Awhitu, New Zealand
Anti-semitism and TDS are often found together.
What?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_and_state-sponsored_terrorismHezbollah emerged in South Lebanon during a consolidation of Shia militias as a rival to the older Amal Movement. Hezbollah played a significant role in the Lebanese civil war, opposing American forces in 1982–83 and opposing Amal and Syria during the 1985–88 War of the Camps. However, Hezbollah's early primary focus was ending Israel's occupation of southern Lebanon following Israel's 1982 invasion and siege of Beirut. Amal, the main Lebanese Shia political group, initiated guerrilla warfare. In 2006, former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak stated, "When we entered Lebanon … there was no Hezbollah. We were accepted with perfumed rice and flowers by the Shia in the south. It was our presence there that created Hezbollah".
 

NZDoug

Council Member
Jul 18, 2017
1,894
31
48
Big Bay, Awhitu, New Zealand
He's a fukking Muslim goat Fukker.. what do you expect.. well Sheep Fukker.. ;)
What ???IIf I was an Arab leader I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal, we took their land. It is true that God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They see but one thing: we come and we have stolen their country. Why should they accept that?”
That statement—which would certainly outrage the current government of Israel and most of its supporters--was made by David Ben Gurion (1886-1973), revered as the father of the State of Israel.
From the very beginning that issue has been at the heart of hostilities between Israel and the Arabs, particularly, of course, the Palestinians—including the tragedy being played out in Gaza today.
more
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article39212.htm
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,884
125
63
What ???IIf I was an Arab leader I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal, we took their land. It is true that God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They see but one thing: we come and we have stolen their country. Why should they accept that?”
That statement—which would certainly outrage the current government of Israel and most of its supporters--was made by David Ben Gurion (1886-1973), revered as the father of the State of Israel.
From the very beginning that issue has been at the heart of hostilities between Israel and the Arabs, particularly, of course, the Palestinians—including the tragedy being played out in Gaza today.
more
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article39212.htm
Must be over the target, lotsa flak.
 

NZDoug

Council Member
Jul 18, 2017
1,894
31
48
Big Bay, Awhitu, New Zealand
Must be over the target, lotsa flak.
Good point!
So a bit more of Palestine has slidden down the plughole. A thousand more acres of Palestinian land stolen by the Israeli government – for “appropriation” is theft, is it not? – and the world has made the usual excuses. The Americans found it “counter-productive” to peace, which is probably a bit less forceful than its reaction would be if Mexico were to bite off a 1,000-acre chunk of Texas and decided to build homes there for its illegal immigrants in the US. But this is “Palestine” (inverted commas more necessary than ever) and Israel has been getting away with theft, albeit not on quite this scale – it is the biggest land heist in 30 years – ever since it signed up to the Oslo agreement in 1993.
The Rabin-Arafat handshake, the promises and handovers of territory and military withdrawals, and the determination to leave everything important (Jerusalem, refugees, the right of return) to the end, until everyone trusted each other so much that the whole thing would be a doddle – no wonder the world bestowed its financial generosity upon the pair. But this latest land-grab not only reduces “Palestine” but continues the circle of concrete around Jerusalem to cut Palestinians off from both the capital they are supposed to share with Israelis and from Bethlehem.
It was instructive to learn the Israeli-Jewish Etzion council regarded this larceny as punishment for the murder of three Israeli teenagers in June. “The goal of the murders of those three youths was to sow fear among us, to disrupt our daily lives and to call into doubt our right [sic] to the land,” the Etzion council announced. “Our response is to strengthen settlement.” This must be the first time that land in “Palestine” has been acquired not through excuses about security or land deeds – or on God’s personal authority – but out of revenge.
And it raises an interesting precedent. If an innocent Israeli life – cruelly taken – is worth around 330 acres of land, then an innocent Palestinian life – equally cruelly taken – must surely equal the same. And if even half the 2,200 Palestinian dead of Gaza last month – and this is a conservative figure – were innocent, then the Palestinians presumably now have the right to take over 330,000 acres of Israeli land, in reality much more. But however “counter-productive” this might be, I’m sure America would not stand for it. Israel takes land, Palestinians lose land; that’s the way it works. And thus it has been since 1948, and that is how it will continue.
There will never be a “Palestine” and the latest territorial robbery is merely another small punctuation mark in the book of sorrow which the Palestinians must read as their dreams of statehood wither. Nabil Abu Rudeineh, the spokesman for the Palestinian “President”, Mahmoud Abbas, said his boss and the “moderate forces” in Palestine had been “stabbed in the back” by the Israeli decision, which is putting it mildly. Abbas has a back covered in knife wounds. What else did he expect when he wrote a book about Palestinian-Israeli relations without once using the word “occupation”?
more
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices...r-lives-is-theft-pure-and-simple-9705378.html