What does that have to do with the book of Revelation and what we were discussing Motar?
The prostitute of Revelation 17 represents false religion in contrast to the bride of Christ in Revelation 21 who epitomizes true faith.
What does that have to do with the book of Revelation and what we were discussing Motar?
Prostitute is a good word. Selling out God for cash. Been that way for a quite some time especially with the advent of Television.The prostitute of Revelation 17 represents false religion in contrast to the bride of Christ in Revelation 21 who epitomizes true faith.
Gee, I dunno especially since you say,
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it - even if I said it - unless your own reason and your own common sense agree."
~ Buddha
Prostitute is a good word. Selling out God for cash. Been that way for a quite some time especially with the advent of Television.
The red dragon follows a different set of rules, those are the rules that were being broken in Ge:6 when God judged the world to be in sin. Those are the same rules that will apply to men who know about good and evil when the new earth starts.False religion like the prostitute described in Revelation 17 is outwardly appealing but inwardly appalling.
Job:14 kind of puts Job as not being too concerned about going there or about how long he might be there. Growing old helps prepare a person, as do long term ailments. Lost teeth, poor eyesight and poor health are all covered in this one verse. The passage is about growing old and how the grave looks from that perspective.The grave, for me it's smiles, I'am finally dead , that's where the action is, Your dead,has life prepared you for the rest? Probably not, it's easyjustn be yourself.
Who among us can be dead first?
The dead have no other option but to rise, we will witness at least, we will crush, that is likely, all who oppose fairn andm just will perish,Anything that alters this 'fact'
1Co:15:32:
If after the manner of men I have fought with beasts at Ephesus,
what advantageth it me,
if the dead rise not?
let us eat and drink;
for to morrow we die.
1Co:15:15:
Yea,
and we are found false witnesses of God;
because we have testified of God that he raised up Christ:
whom he raised not up,
if so be that the dead rise not.
1Co:15:16:
For if the dead rise not,
then is not Christ raised:
1Co:15:17:
And if Christ be not raised,
your faith is vain;
ye are yet in your sins.
The firstnsecond cancelsd tyhe rtfest/ I've been here for a long time whhat about you.What will be more 'exciting', the first 40 days of immortality or the first 1,000 years?
False religion like the prostitute described in Revelation 17 is outwardly appealing but inwardly appalling.
That is the time to be most alert for 'changes in the weather', 'we' have the ability to rule ourselves in a manner that is just short of perfection, it just hasn't been in style in recent memory. Some things we can overcome 'easily' and some things we never will no matter how much effort we throw at it. On the individual level change can take over at any moment, on a national level it is based on the comings and going of it's leaders. We should keep the good ones longer and get rid of the harmful ones earlier.
The way the only way.
the \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
The firstnsecond cancelsd tyhe rtfest/ I've been here for a long time whhat about you.
Sleep, because I AMUST. BWE QUITE I'm sleeping, fuk of I ;'M TIRED
I can see your point in Rev . Motar. I don't recognize the other as anything other than an opinion of someone.
I don't necessarily agree with that Motar. But then there are a lot of things I don't agree with spoken by this person. I prefer what Jesus is said to have spoken.Everyone worships (ascribes ultimate worth to) something or someone, LL. If not the Creator, then a creation becomes the object of our devotion.
I find myself wondering why people would post verses from a collection of books that not everyone believes in. What is the point? Have you an opinion of your own or does every topic have to be validated by your idol?Joh:12:42:
Nevertheless among the chief rulers also many believed on him;
but because of the Pharisees they did not confess him,
lest they should be put out of the synagogue:
I find myself wondering why people would post verses from a collection of books that not everyone believes in. What is the point? Have you an opinion of your own or does every topic have to be validated by your idol?
In my case it supplies what I'm using for a reference and hopefully that shows I'm taking the verse in the context it was meant to be taken. Another aspect is that it eventually shows that your premise that it is a loose collection of unrelated texts is in question at best and flat out wrong at worst. How can I have an opinion of my own when the book supplies that so the best I can do is recognize what should be connected and what shouldn't be? Your argument could be replied to in a few posts of the longer variety, but why bother when you balk at the posts when just one verse and thought is presented. If my argument that the book has one author was shown so that conclusion was 'the best choice' what would it do to your world view as my can live with it quite comfortably.I find myself wondering why people would post verses from a collection of books that not everyone believes in. What is the point? Have you an opinion of your own or does every topic have to be validated by your idol?