WE really need to get rid of this guy

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,222
3,407
113
New Statistics Canada data reveals standard of living on downward spiral
This is part of a longstanding crisis in the Canadian economy that has accelerated under the Trudeau Liberals


Author of the article:Lorrie Goldstein
Published Mar 01, 2025 • Last updated 15 hours ago • 3 minute read

Buried because of the news about the Trump, Vance, Zelenskyy confrontation at the White House on Friday was the release of new economic data by Statistics Canada showing our standard of living has further deteriorated over the past two years.


StatsCan reported that Canada’s real GDP per capita, which measures economic output per person, adjusted for inflation, a widely accepted metric for measuring a nation’s prosperity, fell by 1.4% in 2024, following a decline of 1.3% in 2023.

This is part of a longstanding crisis in the Canadian economy that has accelerated under the Trudeau Liberals.

It is unsurprising given outgoing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s focus on redistributing income as opposed to growing the economy during his decade in office.

Everyone from Bank of Canada Senior Deputy Governor Carolyn Rogers, who has called it a “break the glass” emergency, to Liberal leadership contender Chrystia Freeland, who called it the “Achilles heel” of the Canadian economy when she was finance minister, has sounded the alarm.



The root problem is the low productivity of Canada’s economy, which Freeland said in her 2022 budget speech, “matters because (productivity) is what guarantees the dream of every parent – that our children will be more prosperous than we are” – a dream dying in Canada today.

Low productivity doesn’t mean Canadian workers are lazy but rather that they are not being given access to the latest economic tools and technological advancements to work more efficiently because of a lack of business investment in Canada.

This is particularly alarming because of how far Canada has fallen economically behind the U.S. – our largest trading partner – just as we’re about to enter a tariff war provoked by President Donald Trump, which will further damage our economy.


Jake Fuss, director of fiscal studies for the Fraser Institute writing in The Hub last year, noted that real GDP per capita in Canada during the Trudeau years rose by 1.9%. In the U.S,. during the same period, it increased by 14.7%.



University of Calgary economist Trevor Tombe, also writing in The Hub last year, said that, “if Canada had simply kept pace with the U.S. over the past two years our economy would be 8.5% larger – that’s about $6,200 more income per Canadian each year.”

He estimated that in 2024, the total gap in real GDP per capita between Canada and the U.S. was about $22,000 – $66,300 in the U.S. compared to $44,400 in Canada, in 2015 dollars.


In 2024 dollars, he said, the gap was higher – roughly $28,000.

“Put another way”, Tombe wrote, “real GDP per capita in the U.S. was 43% higher than in Canada in 2023. And in 2024, I estimate this gap will widen to nearly 50%.

“Let that sink in for a moment. The U.S. is on track to produce nearly 50% more per person than Canada will. This stunning divergence is unprecedented in modern history.”

Freeland warned in her 2022 budget that unless this trend is reversed, “the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development projects that Canada will have the lowest per-capita GDP growth rate among its member countries” from 2020 to 2060.

That includes in the G7 to which Canada belongs – along with the U.S., U.K, Germany, France, Italy and Japan.


Liberal apologists will try to camouflage this fiscal emergency by pointing out Canada’s real GDP increased by 2.6% on an annualized basis in the fourth quarter of 2024, higher than expected.

But that was largely because of the dramatic increase in immigration, which the Liberal government authorized, ignoring advance warnings from its own public servants that doing so would increase the cost of living and put added strain on already beleaguered public services such as heath care.

Bringing in more people means there is more economic activity, but if it’s not matched by economic growth it’s bad for everyone – both Canadian citizens and immigrants – which is exactly what happened.

Even Trudeau admitted – too late – that his government brought in too many people too quickly and is now belatedly trying to address the crisis by somewhat reducing immigration targets.

Trudeau also knew about this crisis when he won the 2015 election, as the Fraser Institute’s senior fellow Ben Eisen noted in The Hill Times in January, criticizing then-prime minister Stephen Harper for “having the worst record of economic growth since R.B. Bennett in the depths of the Great Depression.”

During the Harper era, real GDP per capita grew at 0.5% annually. Under Trudeau it’s been 0.3%.

lgoldstein@postmedia.com
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,261
113
Olympus Mons
Money printing, massive borrowing by Liberals damaged Canada over last decade
But the fiscally insane social policies of Justin Trudeau, Chrystia Freeland and Mark Carney have done just as much harm

Author of the article:John Snobelen
Published Feb 28, 2025 • Last updated 1 day ago • 3 minute read

If the definition of integrity is the courage to face reality, then the Liberals have a big integrity gap.


For a decade, Canada – and much of the Western world – has operated in a comfortable cocoon of insanity. Those days are over, displaced by a stark, harsh reality.

Remember the comfortable days when our soon-to-be prime minister proclaimed budgets balance themselves? We have woken from that insanity to a national debt that has more than doubled over the last decade and interest payments that consume every dollar Canadians pay in GST.

Mark Carney and the global finance gurus found a wonderful way to “stimulate” the economy. They just printed a lot of money. What a great idea.

The finance guys called it quantitative easing. Governments wrote big cheques and printed tons of cash. Remember those halcyon days when Chrystia Freeland and Justin Trudeau assured us it was just good fiscal planning to borrow great gobs of cash because money was cheap? Total delusion.


Who would have guessed that printing cash would cause inflation, or that interest rates would rise? Certainly not Freeland, Trudeau or Carney.



Money printing and massive borrowing are only part of the damage inflicted over the last decade. The fiscally insane social policies are just as bad.

Trudeau took every opportunity to apologize, solemnly, for Canada. Not for his own transgressions mind you. He enjoyed apologizing for the real and imagined shortcomings of the imperfect people, like our country’s firs prime minister Sir John A. Macdonald, who built this country. In a gentler time, we called those people nation builders.


The great feminist Trudeau, aided and abetted by the likes of Carney and Freeland, managed to degrade the notion of diversity into a meaningless woke mess. His version of DEI was limited to head counts and room tone. His government had zero tolerance for diversity of opinion or experience or, for that matter, strong women.

The “investments” made with borrowed dollars increased the size of the public service with a corresponding decrease in efficiency and effectiveness. Canada became a bloated bureaucracy, with a branch plant mindset, overburdened with debt, unprepared to defend our borders and, oddly, seemingly adverse to marketing our resources and skills to a hungry world.

It is a shameful record – and we haven’t even begun to reverse course.


These are the real-world outcomes of the fantasies of Trudeau, Carney and Freeland. The Liberal debt will take generations to eradicate, a task left to more serious future governments.

Those future governments will run smack into a lot of impossible expectations. A bankrupt government has made promises that simply cannot be fulfilled. Indigenous communities are in for a big shock.

The same holds for global commitments made without a grasp on reality. The Paris climate accord comes immediately to mind.

This sad record of blissful delusion would be just more warm mush if the world hadn’t lurched into a harsher reality – but it has.

The response of the Trudeau government to a changing world is disbelief and self preservation. Trudeau shut down parliament, leaving lame duck ministers to parade on the world stage in their final, useless and incoherent moments.

Which gets us back to integrity.

Facing reality requires the courage to face and admit failure. Trudeau, Freeland, and Carney do not have that kind of courage.

They have torn at our national pride, weakened our economy, diminished our standing in the world, created impenetrable bureaucracies, and opened our borders.

They should be ashamed.
Some people can't handle reality. The Liberals flat out refuse delivery of it.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
27,856
10,362
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Before it was China vs Canadian Canola & Pork over Hauwei amongst other things, & two years later it’s China vs Canadian Canola over EV tariffs…
China’s retaliation follows a familiar pattern. When Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou was arrested in Vancouver in 2018 at the request of the U.S., Beijing didn’t retaliate against Washington – it went after Canadian farmers, restricting key agricultural exports.
Two years after China lifted a ban on Canadian canola imports, Beijing is launching an anti-dumping investigation into the crop, after Ottawa’s imposition of tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles.
The same playbook is being used now, and yet, Ottawa appears either oblivious or unwilling to acknowledge how much damage this is causing to its own producers.
Strangely, the above scandal got buried in so many other scandals that nobody can keep track of this stuff it seems. Last year, Canada exported $5-billion worth of canola, used for food and biofuel, to China.
At the core of this conflict is Canada’s high-stakes bet on EVs and battery manufacturing. The Liberal federal government has committed nearly $50 billion to develop the sector, funding projects like Stellantis and LG’s battery plant in Windsor, Volkswagen’s gigafactory in St. Thomas, and Northvolt’s facility in Quebec – despite Northvolt’s financial struggles and reports that its parent company is on the verge of bankruptcy.
“Affected by unfair competition from the Canadian side, China’s domestic rapeseed-related industries continue to lose money,” it said.

Ottawa gave a similar justification for its imposition of 100-per-cent tariffs on Chinese-made electric vehicles, after an identical move by the U.S., which ministers said were necessary to protect the burgeoning Canadian EV market.
Additional billions have gone to Ford and other automakers as part of Canada’s strategy to become a global battery hub. Remember about 15 years ago when they were too big to fail?
The Chinese statement made clear that Tuesday’s move was in retaliation for the EV tariffs, referring to them as “discriminatory unilateral restrictive measures” and reiterating a promise to take the case to the World Trade Organization. Canada also sought remedy from the WTO over the 2019 canola ban, but it was lifted before the international organization weighed in.
While these subsidies are intended to create jobs and secure supply chains, they come with immense financial and economic risks. There is no guarantee that Canada’s EV industry will be globally competitive or that these government-backed projects will deliver on their promised returns.

Ottawa has essentially chosen to apply a supply management-style approach to an emerging sector – limiting competition, inflating costs, and betting taxpayer money on an industry that is far from proven. As history has shown, when markets are heavily managed, consumers end up with higher prices, lower quality, and fewer choices.

In prioritizing Ontario and Quebec’s manufacturing jobs, Ottawa has knowingly sacrificed the interests of Canadian farmers and seafood harvesters. Yet, rather than acknowledging this trade-off or offering support, the federal government has remained largely silent.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
115,692
13,690
113
Low Earth Orbit
China’s retaliation follows a familiar pattern. When Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou was arrested in Vancouver in 2018 at the request of the U.S., Beijing didn’t retaliate against Washington – it went after Canadian farmers, restricting key agricultural exports.

The same playbook is being used now, and yet, Ottawa appears either oblivious or unwilling to acknowledge how much damage this is causing to its own producers.

At the core of this conflict is Canada’s high-stakes bet on EVs and battery manufacturing. The Liberal federal government has committed nearly $50 billion to develop the sector, funding projects like Stellantis and LG’s battery plant in Windsor, Volkswagen’s gigafactory in St. Thomas, and Northvolt’s facility in Quebec – despite Northvolt’s financial struggles and reports that its parent company is on the verge of bankruptcy.

Additional billions have gone to Ford and other automakers as part of Canada’s strategy to become a global battery hub. Remember about 15 years ago when they were too big to fail?

While these subsidies are intended to create jobs and secure supply chains, they come with immense financial and economic risks. There is no guarantee that Canada’s EV industry will be globally competitive or that these government-backed projects will deliver on their promised returns.

Ottawa has essentially chosen to apply a supply management-style approach to an emerging sector – limiting competition, inflating costs, and betting taxpayer money on an industry that is far from proven. As history has shown, when markets are heavily managed, consumers end up with higher prices, lower quality, and fewer choices.

In prioritizing Ontario and Quebec’s manufacturing jobs, Ottawa has knowingly sacrificed the interests of Canadian farmers and seafood harvesters. Yet, rather than acknowledging this trade-off or offering support, the federal government has remained largely silent.
I dont want their garbage EVs, canola oil can go for biodiesel, Im enjoying cheaper pork and Im disappointed that they didnt tariff our delicious beef so we can eat AAA or Prime instead overpriced AA garbage.
 

Taxslave2

House Member
Aug 13, 2022
4,515
2,615
113
The same playbook is being used now, and yet, Ottawa appears either oblivious or unwilling to acknowledge how much damage this is causing to its own producers.
Most of them are West of OntariOWE, so it doesn't matter.
In prioritizing Ontario and Quebec’s manufacturing jobs, Ottawa has knowingly sacrificed the interests of Canadian farmers and seafood harvesters. Yet, rather than acknowledging this trade-off or offering support, the federal government has remained largely silent.
And they wonder why they are detested in the West, where all the welfare money comes from to buy votes in the East.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

Taxslave2

House Member
Aug 13, 2022
4,515
2,615
113
Seafood from the Maritimes is also being spanked by the Chinese with their tariffs.
In that case BC seafood will be as well. A lot of our farm fish goes to Asia. Conveniently, the feds have been trying to lose down the farms to please foreign funded environmental groups. Also most of our dive fisheries are export.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
27,856
10,362
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
In that case BC seafood will be as well. A lot of our farm fish goes to Asia. Conveniently, the feds have been trying to lose down the farms to please foreign funded environmental groups. Also most of our dive fisheries are export.
Protects the EV battery market in Canada that I’m not sure if it even exists yet or not.
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,222
3,407
113
Iceland’s minister for children quits after admitting she had baby with teenager 30 years ago
Author of the article:Associated Press
Associated Press
Published Mar 23, 2025 • 1 minute read

LONDON — Iceland’s president on Sunday accepted the resignation of the North Atlantic island nation’s children’s minister, who quit the government over a relationship she had with a teenager more than three decades ago.


Asthildur Loa Thorsdottir stepped down after national broadcaster RUV revealed last week that she had a child 35 years ago when she was 23 and the baby’s father was 16. RUV said the relationship began after the pair met at a church youth group when the teen was 15.

Iceland ‘s age of sexual consent is 15, but it is an offense for an adult to have sex with a teenager they teach, employ or mentor.

Thorsdottir confirmed the relationship in a statement, saying she was not a leader of the church group, just a member, and that “relationships between people of that age were not at all uncommon, even if they were not desirable.”

She said the relationship lasted only a few weeks, though the father was present at the child’s birth.

RUV reported that the father sought access to the couple’s son through the government and church, but was granted only occasional visits, though he paid child support for 18 years.


Thorsdottir, who said the father had made little attempt to establish a relationship with his son, officially stepped down at a meeting Sunday of the State Council, involving government ministers and President Halla Tomasdottir.

Although she has left the government, she remains a lawmaker for the People’s Party, which is part of a coalition government led by Prime Minister Kristrun Frostadottir of the Social Democratic Alliance.

Iceland is a volcanic island nation tucked below the Arctic Circle with a population of less than 400,000. Its parliament, founded in 930 by Viking settlers, is arguably the world’s oldest legislature.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Taxslave2

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,222
3,407
113
City councillors could give themselves eye-popping 24% pay raise
Author of the article:Justin Holmes
Published Mar 25, 2025 • 3 minute read

City hall flush with cash
Toronto city council will consider a report that suggests hiking councillors’ salaries by roughly 24%, to more than $170,500.
Stephen Holyday doesn’t mind if you think he doesn’t deserve a raise. He’s going to do whatever he can to make sure he doesn’t get one.


Toronto city council will consider a report this week that suggests hiking councillors’ salaries by roughly 24%, to more than $170,500. Holyday, the councillor for Etobicoke Centre, says he’ll vote against it.

The optics are awful, he said, “following two years of large tax increases” for Toronto’s citizens, and with the city “on the cusp of economic uncertainty.”

“I hope that council votes this down,” Holyday added, “but even the debate is something that will erode confidence of many electors in the city that are watching.”


The report was done by city hall’s HR department with the help of a consulting firm. It says Toronto city council’s $137,537 salaries don’t stack up especially well against other large Canadian municipalities — particularly not neighbouring Peel and York regions, which pay councillors well over $150,000.

Holyday doesn’t buy that.

“Everybody understands what the salary is when they put their name onto the nomination paper, so I don’t accept that argument,” he said.

“There’s nothing wrong with the system that we have now, and it’s been very fair to everybody at council — and it does allow for a modest increase to reflect inflation, which I think most workers can appreciate.”

The report also says the last significant change to pay for councillors was in 2006, with only cost-of-living increases since. While true, salaries in 2006 were just over $87,000, and have risen with inflation in all but three years — two of them during the pandemic.


Since the COVID freeze, councillor salaries have gone up by 2.85% in 2022, 6.51% in 2023 and 4.23% in 2024. The suggested 24% raise would come on top of a 2.81% inflation adjustment for this year, and be retroactive to Jan. 1.

“The duties of Toronto’s city councillors encompass the oversight of Canada’s largest municipal budget, which includes a substantial housing portfolio and the largest shelter system, the largest public transit system in Canada, the full suite of municipal services to Canada’s largest city while also being responsible for serving large numbers of constituents per councillor,” the report says.

The 24% hike would not apply to Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow, who earns significantly more than a ward councillor. The mayor’s salary last year was $225,304.04.


Chow reportedly told a Tuesday press conference the proposed pay hike is too “steep.” Holyday said the report focuses only on salary, ignoring councillors’ “excellent” benefits such as a pension and severance pay.


“There is no good time, especially now, to consider this report,” Holyday said, but an “important consideration” missing in this process, he said, is MPP pay, which according to news reports could soon go up after a long salary freeze at Queen’s Park.

Holyday suggested that when the next campaign comes, councillors could be held “accountable for how they vote on this.”

Council requested the report in November. By coincidence, councillors’ staff are also seeking more money, and want to unionize — but that effort has been stalled by city hall, which is arguing it is not truly the employer of those workers.

The 24% hike for councillors works out to about $33,000 — “more than what some council staff make in an entire year,” AMAPCEO president Dave Bulmer said in a statement. Council staffers have filed to be represented by AMAPCEO.

The union says it will meet with city hall representatives on April 2.

jholmes@postmedia.com
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,222
3,407
113
City councillors could give themselves eye-popping 24% pay raise
Author of the article:Justin Holmes
Published Mar 25, 2025 • 3 minute read

City hall flush with cash
Toronto city council will consider a report that suggests hiking councillors’ salaries by roughly 24%, to more than $170,500.
Stephen Holyday doesn’t mind if you think he doesn’t deserve a raise. He’s going to do whatever he can to make sure he doesn’t get one.


Toronto city council will consider a report this week that suggests hiking councillors’ salaries by roughly 24%, to more than $170,500. Holyday, the councillor for Etobicoke Centre, says he’ll vote against it.

The optics are awful, he said, “following two years of large tax increases” for Toronto’s citizens, and with the city “on the cusp of economic uncertainty.”

“I hope that council votes this down,” Holyday added, “but even the debate is something that will erode confidence of many electors in the city that are watching.”


The report was done by city hall’s HR department with the help of a consulting firm. It says Toronto city council’s $137,537 salaries don’t stack up especially well against other large Canadian municipalities — particularly not neighbouring Peel and York regions, which pay councillors well over $150,000.

Holyday doesn’t buy that.

“Everybody understands what the salary is when they put their name onto the nomination paper, so I don’t accept that argument,” he said.

“There’s nothing wrong with the system that we have now, and it’s been very fair to everybody at council — and it does allow for a modest increase to reflect inflation, which I think most workers can appreciate.”

The report also says the last significant change to pay for councillors was in 2006, with only cost-of-living increases since. While true, salaries in 2006 were just over $87,000, and have risen with inflation in all but three years — two of them during the pandemic.


Since the COVID freeze, councillor salaries have gone up by 2.85% in 2022, 6.51% in 2023 and 4.23% in 2024. The suggested 24% raise would come on top of a 2.81% inflation adjustment for this year, and be retroactive to Jan. 1.

“The duties of Toronto’s city councillors encompass the oversight of Canada’s largest municipal budget, which includes a substantial housing portfolio and the largest shelter system, the largest public transit system in Canada, the full suite of municipal services to Canada’s largest city while also being responsible for serving large numbers of constituents per councillor,” the report says.

The 24% hike would not apply to Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow, who earns significantly more than a ward councillor. The mayor’s salary last year was $225,304.04.


Chow reportedly told a Tuesday press conference the proposed pay hike is too “steep.” Holyday said the report focuses only on salary, ignoring councillors’ “excellent” benefits such as a pension and severance pay.


“There is no good time, especially now, to consider this report,” Holyday said, but an “important consideration” missing in this process, he said, is MPP pay, which according to news reports could soon go up after a long salary freeze at Queen’s Park.

Holyday suggested that when the next campaign comes, councillors could be held “accountable for how they vote on this.”

Council requested the report in November. By coincidence, councillors’ staff are also seeking more money, and want to unionize — but that effort has been stalled by city hall, which is arguing it is not truly the employer of those workers.

The 24% hike for councillors works out to about $33,000 — “more than what some council staff make in an entire year,” AMAPCEO president Dave Bulmer said in a statement. Council staffers have filed to be represented by AMAPCEO.

The union says it will meet with city hall representatives on April 2.

jholmes@postmedia.com
Do those figures include the average annual haul of bribes & graft?
I wish I had the power to vote myself a raise.
Toronto councillors give themselves gigantic raises
Author of the article:Justin Holmes
Published Mar 27, 2025 • Last updated 10 hours ago • 3 minute read

Toronto city councillors found the courage to hike their own salaries by 24%.


On Thursday evening, Shelley Carroll urged her colleagues to “be brave” and vote “to go right on chronically underpaying yourselves” — only now, they’ll be underpaid at just $170,588.60 a year.

“These are hard times, these are desperately hard times, and we need the best in the city to want to join us in this chamber,” an emotional Carroll said before councillors voted 15-8 to lift their salaries from $137,537.

After the vote, Carroll hugged Councillor James Pasternak on the chamber floor. It was Pasternak who, at November’s council meeting, called for the report that ultimately recommended a 24% raise for Toronto councillors.

Voting in favour were Carroll, Pasternak, Paul Ainslie, Lily Cheng, Rachel Chernos Lin, Mike Colle, Ausma Malik, Nick Mantas, Josh Matlow, Chris Moise, Amber Morley, Jamaal Myers, Anthony Perruzza, Dianne Saxe and Michael Thompson.


Opposed were Brad Bradford, Alejandra Bravo, Vincent Crisanti, Paula Fletcher, Stephen Holyday, Parthi Kandavel, Frances Nunziata and Gord Perks. Jon Burnside and Jennifer McKelvie were absent for the vote, as was Mayor Olivia Chow.

Chow, whose salary is not affected, had reportedly called the pay hike “steep” this week.

Bradford, Crisanti, Holyday, Kandavel and Nunziata had earlier voted to receive the report — effectively rejecting any talk of a raise.


Carroll had proposed something less than what councillors ultimately got. She put forward a motion to raise their salaries to a mere $165,933.43 — essentially the same big raise, just without a cost-of-living increase applied. That motion was made redundant by the $170,588 vote.


Before the vote, Morley asked city bureaucrats if they were aware of any “caps on the amount of hours we work or the demands on our time,” before putting forth the ultimate question: “Do you think councillors get paid enough currently?”

The report was done by city hall’s HR department with the help of a consulting firm. It said the last significant change to councillor salaries was in 2006, with only cost-of-living increases since. While true, salaries in 2006 were just over $87,000, and had risen with inflation in all but three years — two of them during the pandemic.

The report also said council’s $137,537 salaries don’t stack up especially well against other large Canadian municipalities — particularly not neighbouring Peel and York regions, which pay councillors well over $150,000.


At Thursday’s meeting, councillors were told their $137,000 salary put them, in terms of a comparison at city hall, roughly at the level of a manager of something like recreation, HR or finance. Myers asked if the City of Toronto had “any other public servant … that has not received a raise since 2006.”

Moise mentioned the demands on councillors, which he suggested have been exacerbated by the shrinking of Toronto’s number of wards in 2018. He recalled conversations with politicians from places like Burlington and King City, and expressed disbelief at the money they make compared with the workload.

“The job I do is 7 days a week, 24/7,” Moise said.

“I don’t think the salary that’s being requested here is unreasonable. I actually think it’s quite reasonable in comparison to other municipalities not only in Ontario, but across the country itself.”



City staff said it would cost the city about $957,000 more in salaries and benefits in 2025.

Holyday had told the Toronto Sun this week that he would vote against the $33,000 salary hike.

“Everybody understands what the salary is when they put their name onto the nomination paper,” he told the Sun.

The optics are awful, he added, “following two years of large tax increases” for Toronto’s citizens, and with the city “on the cusp of economic uncertainty.”

On Thursday, he told his colleagues: “I just believe that if we do this, it further erodes people’s confidence in government and I don’t think we should do it.”

jholmes@postmedia.com
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,222
3,407
113
Over 377,000 Ontario public servants appear on Sunshine List
Former Ontario Power Generation CEO Kenneth Hartwick tops list again, taking home $2 million in annual salary

Author of the article:Bryan Passifiume
Published Mar 28, 2025 • 2 minute read

Former Ontario Power Generation CEO Kenneth Hartwick (right) tops the Sunshine List again, taking home $2 million in annual salary.
Former Ontario Power Generation CEO Kenneth Hartwick (right) tops the Sunshine List again, taking home $2 million in annual salary.
OTTAWA — $2 million dollars, plus benefits.


That’s what Kenneth Hartwick — the former President and CEO of Ontario Power Generation (OPG) — took home in salary in 2024, topping Ontario’s latest sunshine list.

It’s the first time Hartwick’s salary has broken $2 million, with the annual public-sector salary disclosure revealing he earned $1.93 million in salary in 2023.

In 2024, 377,666 Ontario public servants earned more than $100,000 annually across most provincial sectors and government agencies — around 77,000 more than 2023.

A little more than 10,000 OPG employees earned over $100,000 in 2024, taking up half of the spots in the top 10.

Ontario’s second-highest paid public servant is OPG’s Chief Operations Officer Nicolle Butcher, who earned $978,380 in 2024, with $1,358.88 in benefits.


That’s followed by Steve Gregoris, OPG’s Chief Nuclear Officer, who took home $919,310.33 last year.

Former Metrolinx CEO Phil Verster, who stepped down from his role late last year, came in fourth, earning $883,990,63 plus $13,826.58 in benefits, followed by University Health Network CEO Kevin Smith, who earned $883,097 — plus $93,927.19 in benefits.

The largest cohort are the 118,000 employees of Ontario school boards, amounting to roughly 30% of the names on the list.

Just over 83,000 elementary and secondary school teachers appear across Ontario’s English and French language school boards — with 14,045 employed by the Toronto District School Board, and 5,255 with Toronto’s Catholic board.

The Peel District School Board has 9,015 employees earning over $100K annually.


Toronto, Ontario’s largest city, has just under 18,000 employees on the sunshine list — plus 6,113 Toronto police employees earning over $100K annually, and 6,841 TTC employees.

Ottawa, Ontario’s second largest city, has 4,713 workers on its list (minus police,) while Ontario’s third-largest city of Brampton only lists 1,425 employees.



That’s compared to Hamilton with 2,990, Mississauga with 2,098, Peel Region with 2,362, Durham Region is 2,464 and Durham with 2,464.

The Ontario Provincial Police have 5,824 officers and civilians earning over $100,000, while Toronto police have 6,113 and Peel Regional Police with 2,362.


As for employees of the provincial government, 31,506 employees of government ministries are on the list, 648 work for the legislative assembly and 18,724 work for provincial crown agencies.

The sunshine list was introduced in 1996, when a $100,000 salary would equal about $180,000 in today’s money.

Franco Terrazzano, federal director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, said the best place Ontario Premier Doug Ford can find savings is to trim the fat in the Ontario public service.

“Premier Doug Ford needs to show leadership and make some cuts because taxpayers can’t afford to pay for a bigger bureaucracy taking bigger pay,” he said.

“Taxpayers have struggled through a pandemic, cost of living crisis and now a tariff war, when will these government bureaucrats ever share in the burden and take a cut?”

bpassifiume@postmedia.com
X: @bryanpassifiume
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,222
3,407
113
Ottawa posts $26.8 billion deficit for April-to-January period
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Published Mar 28, 2025 • < 1 minute read

OTTAWA — The federal government posted a budgetary deficit of $26.8 billion for the April-to-January period of its 2024-25 fiscal year.


The result compared with a deficit of $25.7 billion for the same period a year earlier.

According to the Finance Department’s monthly fiscal monitor, revenue for the 10-month period totalled $398.6 billion, up from $359.3 billion a year earlier, boosted by gains in all categories.

Program expenses excluding net actuarial losses amounted to $376.5 billion, up from $339.5 billion, boosted by increases across all major categories.

Public debt charges totalled $45.5 billion, up from $39.2 billion.

Net actuarial losses were nearly $3.4 billion, down from $6.3 billion a year ago.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
27,856
10,362
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Ottawa posts $26.8 billion deficit for April-to-January period
Author of the article:Canadian Press
Canadian Press
Published Mar 28, 2025 • < 1 minute read

OTTAWA — The federal government posted a budgetary deficit of $26.8 billion for the April-to-January period of its 2024-25 fiscal year.


The result compared with a deficit of $25.7 billion for the same period a year earlier.

According to the Finance Department’s monthly fiscal monitor, revenue for the 10-month period totalled $398.6 billion, up from $359.3 billion a year earlier, boosted by gains in all categories.

Program expenses excluding net actuarial losses amounted to $376.5 billion, up from $339.5 billion, boosted by increases across all major categories.

Public debt charges totalled $45.5 billion, up from $39.2 billion.

Net actuarial losses were nearly $3.4 billion, down from $6.3 billion a year ago.
1743262742148.jpeg
1743262767562.jpeg
1743262819327.jpeg
1743262852379.jpeg
1743262924082.jpeg
1743262960132.jpeg
1743263103609.jpeg
1743263191915.jpeg
1743263805965.jpeg
1743263952847.jpeg