So what with all that shooting and all, it wasn't a war?Russian Revolution was a rise of the working class against the oppressive bourgeoisie. .
OK, how bout WWII? Or the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan?
So what with all that shooting and all, it wasn't a war?Russian Revolution was a rise of the working class against the oppressive bourgeoisie. .
Communism and extreme poverty are synonymous. So? Communism and despotism are synonymous. So? Communism and elitism are synonymous. Communism cannot survive unless there is an oligarchy. As soon as there is an oligarchy, your ideal of communism disappears.Capitalism and Greed are synonymous.
And China, the USSR, Viet Nam, etc. have never been in wars. Interesting.All wars were battles between the ruling classes of imperialist powers. They got regular citizens to fight for them with propaganda and nationalist rhetoric.
You claim it, you prove it.Also Capitalism has nothing to do with human nature
And listen to you parrot your inane idealism about communism? erm ..... Nope.So if you could stop parroting that nonsense already that would be nice.
And where in the world would oppressive bourgeoisie come from in a utopian communist country?Russian Revolution was a rise of the working class against the oppressive bourgeoisie. .
This further proves my point. In the 80s the USSR was implementing capitalist ideals.. (Gorbachev's perestroika) , and as a result that came with imperialist aggression to insert influence on Afghanistan and the middle east. interestingly enough, as a result of Gorbachev's crippling of the USSR with his capitalist ideology and war mongering imperialism (inherent in capitalism) the bourgeois gave him a nobel peace prize.So what with all that shooting and all, it wasn't a war?
OK, how bout WWII? Or the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan?
Communism and extreme poverty are synonymous. So? Communism and despotism are synonymous. So? Communism and elitism are synonymous. Communism cannot survive unless there is an oligarchy. As soon as there is an oligarchy, your ideal of communism disappears.
Not like the massive extent that it is evident in communist countries.no, poverty is inherent in capitalism.
Maybe some of them do ignore it. So?this is obvious if you think about it, liberals choose to ignore that reality..
But it is exactly why the communist ideal is doomed before it can start. Unless you have a population of one, there will always be someone to grab power and someone to follow. It is blatantly obvious that human beings are not equal, do not think equally, and do not act equally.no oligarchy can survive in communism, that's not communism, that's contradictory to its entire ideology.
Everything proves your point.This further proves my point.