War, something we can be so proud of :roll:

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Capitalism and Greed are synonymous.
Communism and extreme poverty are synonymous. So? Communism and despotism are synonymous. So? Communism and elitism are synonymous. Communism cannot survive unless there is an oligarchy. As soon as there is an oligarchy, your ideal of communism disappears.

All wars were battles between the ruling classes of imperialist powers. They got regular citizens to fight for them with propaganda and nationalist rhetoric.
And China, the USSR, Viet Nam, etc. have never been in wars. Interesting.
Also Capitalism has nothing to do with human nature
You claim it, you prove it.
So if you could stop parroting that nonsense already that would be nice.
And listen to you parrot your inane idealism about communism? erm ..... Nope.

Russian Revolution was a rise of the working class against the oppressive bourgeoisie. .
And where in the world would oppressive bourgeoisie come from in a utopian communist country?

Someone sure did a very thorough job of brainwashing you, harpercons. I am sorry for you. Propaganda is not a good replacement for reality.
 

HarperCons

Council Member
Oct 18, 2015
1,865
74
48
So what with all that shooting and all, it wasn't a war?

OK, how bout WWII? Or the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan?
This further proves my point. In the 80s the USSR was implementing capitalist ideals.. (Gorbachev's perestroika) , and as a result that came with imperialist aggression to insert influence on Afghanistan and the middle east. interestingly enough, as a result of Gorbachev's crippling of the USSR with his capitalist ideology and war mongering imperialism (inherent in capitalism) the bourgeois gave him a nobel peace prize.

Communism and extreme poverty are synonymous. So? Communism and despotism are synonymous. So? Communism and elitism are synonymous. Communism cannot survive unless there is an oligarchy. As soon as there is an oligarchy, your ideal of communism disappears.

no, poverty is inherent in capitalism. this is obvious if you think about it, liberals choose to ignore that reality..

no oligarchy can survive in communism, that's not communism, that's contradictory to its entire ideology.
 

Ludlow

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 7, 2014
13,588
0
36
wherever i sit down my ars
I remember good Reverend Moon would instruct his followers to deny all new converts any means of protein so as to deplete their reasoning capabilities. Part of the brain washing procedure from what I understand. My advise to Harper, have a peanut butter sammich couple times a day.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
no, poverty is inherent in capitalism.
Not like the massive extent that it is evident in communist countries.
this is obvious if you think about it, liberals choose to ignore that reality..
Maybe some of them do ignore it. So?

no oligarchy can survive in communism, that's not communism, that's contradictory to its entire ideology.
But it is exactly why the communist ideal is doomed before it can start. Unless you have a population of one, there will always be someone to grab power and someone to follow. It is blatantly obvious that human beings are not equal, do not think equally, and do not act equally.