So to be a Christian means you don't believe in global climate change (which DOESN'T exist, by the way)?
Well, if that's the case, can anyone care to tell me why, back in July, the Church of England General Synod (the Church's deliberative and legistlative body) overwhelmingly, and rather unfortunately, welcomed the new climate change policy adopted by the Church's investing bodies?
Speaking during the afternoon debate, entitled 'climate change and investment policy' debate, the Bishop of Manchester, David Walker, said:
"Climate change calls for an urgent response from all of us - individually, institutionally, nationally and internationally. And that includes investors.
"The question is not whether climate change is an important and urgent ethical investment issue, but how to reflect this importance and urgency in ethical investment policy."
Talking about the new climate change policy implemented since 1st May 2015 on the recommendation from the Church's Ethical Investment Advisory Group, Bishop David said:
"The EIAG develops policies formed by biblical understanding, theological reflection and an appreciation of the views of the Church. These policies are, without exception, extraordinarily well considered and distinctly Anglican. They are practical for institutional investors with fiduciary responsibilities.
The new policy has already been welcomed from both within and outside the Church. The Bishop of Salisbury today called the policy 'exemplary'. Nick Stern, Chair of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change, has praised the investing bodies 'fine and wise leadership'. Christiana Figueres, the Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, has said the policy is 'expressive of investor integrity'.
https://churchofengland.org/media-c...ral-synod-welcomes-climate-change-policy.aspx
I'll also repeat that global warming doesn't exist, so any Christian or non-Christian who doesn't believe in it is actually showing common sense and is not a naive, gullible person who instantly believes all the exaggerated, scaremongering hype peddled by the Wamists.
Well, if that's the case, can anyone care to tell me why, back in July, the Church of England General Synod (the Church's deliberative and legistlative body) overwhelmingly, and rather unfortunately, welcomed the new climate change policy adopted by the Church's investing bodies?

Speaking during the afternoon debate, entitled 'climate change and investment policy' debate, the Bishop of Manchester, David Walker, said:
"Climate change calls for an urgent response from all of us - individually, institutionally, nationally and internationally. And that includes investors.
"The question is not whether climate change is an important and urgent ethical investment issue, but how to reflect this importance and urgency in ethical investment policy."
Talking about the new climate change policy implemented since 1st May 2015 on the recommendation from the Church's Ethical Investment Advisory Group, Bishop David said:
"The EIAG develops policies formed by biblical understanding, theological reflection and an appreciation of the views of the Church. These policies are, without exception, extraordinarily well considered and distinctly Anglican. They are practical for institutional investors with fiduciary responsibilities.
The new policy has already been welcomed from both within and outside the Church. The Bishop of Salisbury today called the policy 'exemplary'. Nick Stern, Chair of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change, has praised the investing bodies 'fine and wise leadership'. Christiana Figueres, the Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, has said the policy is 'expressive of investor integrity'.
https://churchofengland.org/media-c...ral-synod-welcomes-climate-change-policy.aspx
I'll also repeat that global warming doesn't exist, so any Christian or non-Christian who doesn't believe in it is actually showing common sense and is not a naive, gullible person who instantly believes all the exaggerated, scaremongering hype peddled by the Wamists.