US Terror Suspects Making Canadian Stops

[FiveParadox]

Retired_Can_Soldier, I was making reference to the same-sex marriage debate that took place recently in the United States of America (although some of such debates continue to this day), not to this debate (as in the present discussion on this forum).

Jay, that is not the case in Canada, and Canadian Content is administered pursuant to Canadian law, as per the terms of service, whether or not you happen to subscribe to the merit or ideals of those laws.

 

[Sassylassie]

I had my husband check his Transport Canada Regs and it states that all International Flights will file a flight plan with Transport Canada and upon landing on Canadian Soil Customs Canada will inspect the passengers, aircraft and flight manifest of said flight. In essence our Governent past and present are aware and allowing such flights unless they are working under the radar and using new security laws to subvert Transport Canada Regulations.

 

[Jay]

Re: RE: US Terror Suspects Making Canadian Stops

Jay, that is not the case in Canada, and Canadian Content is administered pursuant to Canadian law, as per the terms of service, whether or not you happen to subscribe to the merit or ideals of those laws.

Are you accusing members of using hate speech here Five? That's a pretty big charge IMO, you should back it up. But I'm sure if you go over Dark Beavers post you will find some, not that you ever mention anything about those folks....

 

[sanch]

Jay, that is not the case in Canada, and Canadian Content is administered pursuant to Canadian law, as per the terms of service, whether or not you happen to subscribe to the merit or ideals of those laws.

The site is on a US server is it not?

 

[FiveParadox]

Jay, your damned arrogance is starting to get to me. I don't read half of what darkbeaver writes, because most of the time he's completely full of crap; I don't report or comment on what I don't read. And no, I was not accusing anyone of using hate speech on Canadian Content, nevermind in this thread — I was making a point as to the terms of service of this site, based on what you had said.

 

[FiveParadox]

Please review Section 1 of the Forum Rules, sanch.

:!: Revision : Corrected a formatting error.

 

[sanch]

I am in the US and I am posting to a server housed in the US then the legal jurisdiction is the US I would think. No? I know we agree to the terms of service which seem to be ignored by some anyway but I wonder how much weight simply agreeing to abide by Canadian law would hold in a foreign court.

 

[EagleSmack]

I have attended Catholic Church and they have never once preached hatred against Gays. Just because of the fact they disagree with same sex marriage does not make that HATE SPEECH.

I know that the radical Gay Groups call it that but that is just the way that they operate. For example

"I don't agree with same sex marriage."

"You're a BIGOT! A HOMOPHOBE! YOU HATE!"

"No... I really don't hate you. I just do not agree with what you are doing."

"YOU BIGOT... YOU NAZI...YOU RIGHT WING CHRISTIAN EXTREMIST."

Get the point?

Christians are easy targets because they are taught tolerance.

We all see what happens to people who speak out against islam. They get gunned down in the street and their throats cut. You will never see Radical Gay Groups REALLY come out against islamic groups or protest in front of a mosque. They will protest in front of churches because it is much safer even though islam would have them all killed.

 

[FiveParadox]

Really now, EagleSmack, I don't think of myself as much of a "radical gay" — however, when I see "Christians" preaching slogans such as "God hates fags" and "AIDS kills fags dead", I tend to be a bit skeptical. And I didn't see a huge Christian outcry at that, either; those moderate Christians must be complacent.

 

[EagleSmack]

Five... I KNOW exactly of who you speak of and if you will look closely to those nut jobs you will find them mostly protesting outside OTHER Christian Churches. This truly is one group that follow one self proclaimed prophet.

They used to go to famous Gay people's funerals and the funerals of celebrities. They even showed up at Frank Sinatra's funeral.

They protest and praise the death of our soldiers! That is one of their latest shenanigans. They go to the funeral of any soldier and say "Sgt. "So and So" is in HELL". Why? "Because he fights for a country that supports Fags"

Those are their words not mine. Again you won't see those nut jobs in front of a mosque either.

And you know what else... you won't see any radical Gay Groups in front of that crazy church protesting because there might be trouble.

 

[EagleSmack]

Fred Phelps... that is the creep's name. He is the guy who takes his flock from funeral to funeral condeming everyone.

I cringed even trying to do a search to find his name.

 

[Retired_Can_Soldier]

Five: As I said before. I don't always agree with you but enjoy engaging you in debate. There are many things we might disagree on, but much we could learn from each others point of view.

Somewhere in the center of such debate common ground could be found. I am not big supporter of SSM, but I have moved from totally against to willing to listen.

For the record. I find these funeral protesters repugnant. I hope they are judged by a higher power.

Cheers
M

 

[Colpy]

Re: RE: US Terror Suspects Making Canadian Stops

Fred Phelps... that is the creep's name. He is the guy who takes his flock from funeral to funeral condeming everyone.

I cringed even trying to do a search to find his name.

Some people are beyond redemption.

This guy is scum, absolute garbage. His people are so afraid.....of what?

I am not a SSM supporter, but I do believe people have ever right to carry on with their lives in whatever fashion they like, providing no one else is harmed.

"judge not, lest ye be judged"

 

[Jay]

Colpy! Welcome back.

 

[FiveParadox]

It would be interesting to see if the statistics are any different for people who oppose same-sex marriage, but would oppose the repeal of the Civil Marriage Act on the bases that rights, once granted, shouldn't be taken away.