How so? I would think that most nations have there own sets of rules, rights or constitutions.
Is that one set for domestics and another (not quite so nice) for strangers. The most likely raesom the domestic people have rights/protections/priviledges is they gained them through some form of revolt/persuasion rather than the rulers simply waking up one day and doing it out of the goodness of their heart. If those methods are extended to others then the 'revolt' would be avoided. If the locals don't like to be taken advantage of in certain areas them it is very possible that people outside the collective will feel/react the same way when treated in a certain way.
Just like when Ann Coulture went up to Canada to speak. She was informed that speech laws in Canada were different and she should be careful what she says.
Didn't she want to invade us or since we were Canada who cared what we thought at some point back, was that trip part of some sensitivity training.
In conclusion... Our Constituion is ours.
True and in it's unaltered state is is pretty good at covering most of the topics it covers. If it creates harmony inside the borders then why would you not also assume it would do the same if implemented in basically the same way when dealing with foreign Nations. A good examplew of how NOT to act is this. NFLD produces power and gets a contract to sell it to the US, to do that they have to run lines through Quebec. That should have made NFLD the big gainer and Quebec the small gainer, It didn't work that way, Quebec ended up being able to 'sell the power' to NY at an increased rate or one where they got the lions share of the profits. Resentments linger on today over that 'shafting' by doing deals you would want no part of id the tables were turned.
Oh the protests definately led to the end of the Vietnam War but not the end of the US Government.
It was only meany to steer the Gov, you might be better off today if you had a few more protests like that, say in 1913 when the Fed was created, every penny of that interest they collected could be part of the current economy. As that case points out not all protests are bad, even in today's climate.
Oh brother. Are you saying we fought the Vietnam War for heroine?
No, are you saying 'Air America' wasn't about drugs or that Afghanistan has drugs because that is what the CIA wants?
Nor was I promoting plantong medical pot in Japan to combat ground contamination, hemp is a fiber crop.
It was. Some whacko Preacher in Florida burned a book in front of 30 people and the animals went wild over there.
The US has 3,000 of its people killed in a yet to be proven incident and that justifies them killing more than 1,000,000 as some form of 'retribution' on people who had absolutely nothing to do with any of it? How can that not be pot-kettle-black??