The undemocratic principle aside, what makes his policies any less harmful than, say Miller's?
From what I've been reading Ford is using some budgetary trickery, and he still can't pay off the city deficit/debt. He also preaches against unions, but gives in to police union demands. And then, there are the social blunders - not attending gay pride, bird flipping people, talking on his cell while driving. And the latest polls show his support dropped to around 30% if I'm not mistaken.
There is tons of stuff mounting, no where near the backlash that Miller endured in his first year.
Edit: I didn't even mention his transit failure - which was probably his most compelling promise just a year ago.