Trump supports Roy Moore's child molestation

[B00Mer]

**** you're an idiot. His accusers weren't prepubescent children when molested.

They were 16 years of age.. illegal in Canada and illegal in Alabama, for someone of 18 years of age or older to engage in sexual acts with someone 17 years of age or younger..

It's the law.. but we know how you like to interoperate the law to fit your views.

 

[MHz]

I'm not sure where you got you facts from but this is how the version goes that I looked up, it is slightly different.


The Tackling Violent Crime Act raises the legal age of sexual consent in Canada to 16 from 14, the first time it has been raised since 1892. But the law includes a "close-in-age exception," meaning 14- and 15-year-olds can have sex with someone who is less than five years older.May 1, 2008

 

[Cannuck]

They were 16 years of age.. illegal in Canada and illegal in Alabama, for someone of 18 years of age or older to engage in sexual acts with someone 17 years of age or younger..

It's the law.. but we know how you like to interoperate the law to fit your views.

16 years old is not prepubescent. You're a moron

 

[MHz]

I was under the impression it was 18 and got lowered to 16 rather than raised to 16 which actually protected 14 year olds from being tapped by men. I wonder how it got set to 14 in a Christian nation in the first place? Raised in 1892 to 14 (?) so what was it before??

 

[Jinentonix]

Walter's on the prowl again.

Yep. But notice how he didn't deftly avoid this thread like you did when it was discovered that Ontario's sex-ed curriculum was authored, at least in part, by a convicted pedophile? Three threads on that topic at least and the only thing you managed to post was some drive-by stupidity on one of them.

So, one can assume by your silence on the subject that you approve of convicted Liberal pedophiles. You only care when it's Conservatives simply being accused of it.

That just about sum up your f*ckheaded perspective?

Newsflash: Pedophilia is NOT a subject to be playing your sub-moronic, idiotic, f*cking retarded, partisan hackery games. The fact that you engage in this shit is proof that you don't see the victims as victims. To borrow from Tec, you only care about them so you can use them as a beating stick against those you politically oppose.

 

[Cannuck]

Again, there is no evidence that Moore is a pedophile. Only stupid people can't grasp the concept

 

[B00Mer]

Again, there is no evidence that Moore is a pedophile. Only stupid people can't grasp the concept

Actually your right.. his not a pedophile, he is just a creep like you who defends a man who has sex with a 16 year old kid, a grown man abusing his power over a kid..

Canada:

Criminal law legislation is under federal jurisdiction in Canada. Prior to a few years ago, the age of consent was 14. The conservatives under Harper raised the age to 16.

Alabama:

Alabama Code Title 13A. Criminal Code § 13A-6-61

(a) A person commits the crime of rape in the first degree if:

(1) He or she engages in sexual intercourse with a member of the opposite sex by forcible compulsion;  or

(2) He or she engages in sexual intercourse with a member of the opposite sex who is incapable of consent by reason of being physically helpless or mentally incapacitated;  or

(3) He or she, being 16 years or older, engages in sexual intercourse with a member of the opposite sex who is less than 12 years old.

(b) Rape in the first degree is a Class A felony.

So in Alabama, you can have sex with a 13 year old and above and it's legal..

 

[White_Unifier]

Actually your right.. his not a pedophile, he is just a creep like you who defends a man who has sex with a 16 year old kid, a grown man abusing his power over a kid..

Canada:

Criminal law legislation is under federal jurisdiction in Canada. Prior to a few years ago, the age of consent was 14. The conservatives under Harper raised the age to 16.

Alabama:

Alabama Code Title 13A. Criminal Code § 13A-6-61

(a) A person commits the crime of rape in the first degree if:

(1) He or she engages in sexual intercourse with a member of the opposite sex by forcible compulsion;  or

(2) He or she engages in sexual intercourse with a member of the opposite sex who is incapable of consent by reason of being physically helpless or mentally incapacitated;  or

(3) He or she, being 16 years or older, engages in sexual intercourse with a member of the opposite sex who is less than 12 years old.

(b) Rape in the first degree is a Class A felony.

The law should expand that to include same-sex and forced penetration of the vagina, mouth, or anus by any object, whether the perpetrator forces the an object into another person or the other person's penis into himself.

Right now it seems way too narrowly defined.

As for Alabama, you'd think they'd raise it to at least 15!

And even then with the consent of both living natural parents.

 

[Corduroy]

Doesn't matter what the law says in a specific jurisdiction. Even if it's legal he's still a pedophile.

And B00Mer you keep missing Cannuck's point. He's needling over the dictionary definition of "pedophile."

Welcome to the internet.

 

[TenPenny]

Again, there is no evidence that Moore is a pedophile. Only stupid people can't grasp the concept

You are, as usual, confused between the medical definition of pedophile, and the legal definition. Prepubescence has nothing to do with the legal definition. I suggest you consult your lawyer before you get yourself in real trouble.


For example, in Canada,


"
1. In this Act,
"pedophile" means a person who has at any time been convicted of a sexual offence respecting a child or in respect of whom an order of prohibition has been made under section 161 of the Criminal Code (Canada); ("pédophile")
"sexual offence respecting a child" means an offence under section 163.1 of the Criminal Code (Canada) or any of the following provisions of the Criminal Code (Canada) if the victim of the offence was under 18 years of age: sections 151, 152, 153, 155 and 159, subsections 160 (2) and (3), sections 170 and 172, subsection 173 (2) and sections 271, 272 and 273. ("infraction sexuelle concernant un enfant")"

 

[Walter]

Everything is alleged but all the lefties on the board have drawn a quartered Moore.

 

[TenPenny]

Everything is alleged but all the lefties on the board have drawn a quartered Moore.

So, you're saying that Hillary is innocent, and you'll stop bashing her. That's very nice of you.

 

[Danbones]

Yes keeps everyone from looking at them

they think

So, you're saying that Hillary is innocent, and you'll stop bashing her. That's very nice of you.

Just cause YOU don't do evidence that doesn't mean others haven't

Too bad that's one of your fatal flaws.

Of course bill the perv paid out because he was innocent...pervo/pedos always pay out because they are innocent.

 

[White_Unifier]

You are, as usual, confused between the medical definition of pedophile, and the legal definition. Prepubescence has nothing to do with the legal definition. I suggest you consult your lawyer before you get yourself in real trouble.


For example, in Canada,


"
1. In this Act,
"pedophile" means a person who has at any time been convicted of a sexual offence respecting a child or in respect of whom an order of prohibition has been made under section 161 of the Criminal Code (Canada); ("pédophile")
"sexual offence respecting a child" means an offence under section 163.1 of the Criminal Code (Canada) or any of the following provisions of the Criminal Code (Canada) if the victim of the offence was under 18 years of age: sections 151, 152, 153, 155 and 159, subsections 160 (2) and (3), sections 170 and 172, subsection 173 (2) and sections 271, 272 and 273. ("infraction sexuelle concernant un enfant")"

Actually, I see a problem with that definition of pedophile. Outside of legal terminology, a pedophile has not necessarily molested a child (or watched or downloaded or produced child pornography or even hurt a child in anyway), whereas a molester has. If the legal definition of 'pedophile' becomes synonymous with the dictionary definition of 'molester,' then what word does the law use to distinguish between a molester (or in legal terms, a pedophile) and a person who feels sexual attraction to children but who has not acted on that attraction?

I think the distinction is important not only in legal terms but in mental-health terms too. While we may wish to deter pedophiles and hebephiles (according to the dictionary definition) from hurting children through punitive sanctions should they molest them, do we not also want to provide assistance to pedophiles and hebephiles who have not yet molested children too? If we fail to make that distinction, then how can a pedophile or hebephile who has not yet hurt a child comfortably seek help for his affliction? If we stigmatize not just molestation but even pedophilia itself, then do we not become a part of the problem ourselves?

 

[mentalfloss]

Yep. But notice how he didn't deftly avoid this thread like you did when it was discovered that Ontario's sex-ed curriculum was authored, at least in part, by a convicted pedophile? Three threads on that topic at least and the only thing you managed to post was some drive-by stupidity on one of them.

So, one can assume by your silence on the subject that you approve of convicted Liberal pedophiles. You only care when it's Conservatives simply being accused of it.

That just about sum up your f*ckheaded perspective?

Newsflash: Pedophilia is NOT a subject to be playing your sub-moronic, idiotic, f*cking retarded, partisan hackery games. The fact that you engage in this shit is proof that you don't see the victims as victims. To borrow from Tec, you only care about them so you can use them as a beating stick against those you politically oppose.

You actually did all that typing for something that was entirely fabricated in your own mind.

Sad.

 

[Walter]

So, you're saying that Hillary is innocent, and you'll stop bashing her. That's very nice of you.

Nothing alleged about her illegal email server.

 

[TenPenny]

Nothing alleged about her illegal email server.

Ah, so you have a court of law ruling? Please share it.

Just cause YOU don't do evidence that doesn't mean others haven't

Okay, so post a link to the court cases.


Or do you 'not do evidence'?

 

[Corduroy]

If the legal definition of 'pedophile' becomes synonymous with the dictionary definition of 'molester,' then what word does the law use to distinguish between a molester (or in legal terms, a pedophile) and a person who feels sexual attraction to children but who has not acted on that attraction?

Why would the law need a word for pedophiles who haven't committed any crimes?

 

[darkbeaver]

Any modern nformed law enforcement superstructure is familiar with prepedophilia suggestions.

infant adoration fer instance,an arent they cute could get you handcuffed.

I like young peaple because of thier ability to move firewood.

Roy Who

 

[TenPenny]

Any modern nformed law enforcement superstructure is familiar with prepedophilia suggestions.

infant adoration fer instance,an arent they cute could get you handcuffed.

I like young peaple because of thier ability to move firewood.

Roy Who

Eye wonce mett a mann hoooo cult spell. Hist meenings was cleareing of the most.