trudeau crossed the floor and pushed aside NDP MPs

[IdRatherBeSkiing]

In Canada Friday (Thursday for some) to Monday is May two four and actual dates and time are forgotten......

Some people are convinced that Justin Trudeau will pay a price for his less than sunny behaviour in the House last week.

Tom Walkom isn't so sure (link is external). Canadians, he writes like to have "chippy" prime ministers:

Trudeau broke all the rules Wednesday when he marched across the Commons floor, grabbed Conservative whip Gord Brown by the arm and hustled him to his seat, all in order to get a projected vote underway.

In the melee, the prime minister also inadvertently elbowed Quebec New Democrat MP Ruth-Ellen Brousseau in the chest.

New Democrats standing nearby said Trudeau used a vulgar synonym for fornication as he urged MPs to get out of his way.

But this kind of behaviour isn't new to prime ministers:

Voters often like it when a prime minister gets tough or rude. Jean Chrétien suffered no political penalty when, as prime minister, he grabbed a peaceful protester by the throat and forced him to the ground.

Pierre Trudeau, in what became known as the fuddle-duddle incident, famously told opposition MPs to fornicate with themselves. Voters elected his Liberals to government three more times after that.

Was it polite behaviour? Certainly not. It showed that Trudeau can be impetuous and far from sunny. More importantly, his actions caused proceedings to ground to a halt. But Trudeau apologized more than once. Other than his apology for residential schools, when was the last time you heard Stephen Harper apologize?

Will he pay? We'll see.

This incident alone won't mean a hill of beans in 3.5 years. I don't think you can even predict what will be a factor then right now. Last election even at the time it was called, the factors which did play a factor were not clear. The one before that with Iggy, when the election was called it looked like it would have been a Liberal minority. Next time, with marijuana legalized and assuming the PC or NDP (with their new leaders) don't promise to revoke it, the drug crazed hippies won't show up at the polls and it will be a different election. I am not making a prediction on the outcome because here in Ontario we re-elected a stupid incompetent corrupt government for the 3rd or 4th time. So anything is possible.

 

[DaSleeper]

In Canada Friday (Thursday for some) to Monday is May two four and actual dates and time are forgotten......

Some people are convinced that Justin Trudeau will pay a price for his less than sunny behaviour in the House last week.

Tom Walkom isn't so sure (link is external). Canadians, he writes like to have "chippy" prime ministers:

Trudeau broke all the rules Wednesday when he marched across the Commons floor, grabbed Conservative whip Gord Brown by the arm and hustled him to his seat, all in order to get a projected vote underway.

In the melee, the prime minister also inadvertently elbowed Quebec New Democrat MP Ruth-Ellen Brousseau in the chest.

New Democrats standing nearby said Trudeau used a vulgar synonym for fornication as he urged MPs to get out of his way.

But this kind of behaviour isn't new to prime ministers:

Voters often like it when a prime minister gets tough or rude. Jean Chrétien suffered no political penalty when, as prime minister, he grabbed a peaceful protester by the throat and forced him to the ground.

Pierre Trudeau, in what became known as the fuddle-duddle incident, famously told opposition MPs to fornicate with themselves. Voters elected his Liberals to government three more times after that.

Was it polite behaviour? Certainly not. It showed that Trudeau can be impetuous and far from sunny. More importantly, his actions caused proceedings to ground to a halt. But Trudeau apologized more than once. Other than his apology for residential schools, when was the last time you heard Stephen Harper apologize?

Will he pay? We'll see.

 

[captain morgan]

Manhandled?

I never thought you were the sensitive type and could easily be manhandled in such a way.

I can see that it really bothers you that Trudeau has stepped squarely in this.

Gotta chuckle every time when one of his apologists has to point somewhere else and attempt a deflection rather than deal with the issue.

BTW - you notice that the new description of what happened is being referred to as a physical molestation?... Best not to let Trudeau around any babies to kiss come election time, we'd hate to see another molestation scandal

 

[Kreskin]

He should be charged with treason and attempted murder.

 

[JLM]

Off-limits: Personal attacks, cursing, anything 18+, adult-themed comments. Follow the forum rules.

Don't hold your breath, Cliffy, expecting results from that quarter...............................no sense, no feeling!

He should be charged with treason and attempted murder.

Absolutely.........................drawn and quartered and run out on a rail!

 

[Angstrom]

The Liberals feel entitled to have unimpeded right to past legislation due to its majority, and want to skip due process in order to go enjoy life instead of doing their jobs.

The opposition. Know this, so are deliberately making matter worst, just to enjoy making the life of the governing party as miserable as possible.

It's called micro aggression :lol:

And Justine just lost his $hit dealing with opposition behaviour slow down the process, and make it as annoying as possible for the governing party to impose its agenda.

Because all he wants is to be on a island building a castle with himself, and his kids and wife.

 

[JLM]

I can see that it really bothers you that Trudeau has stepped squarely in this.

Gotta chuckle every time when one of his apologists has to point somewhere else and attempt a deflection rather than deal with the issue.

BTW - you notice that the new description of what happened is being referred to as a physical molestation?... Best not to let Trudeau around any babies to kiss come election time, we'd hate to see another molestation scandal

Not to mention the axe murdering rampage that's bound to follow!

The amount of mindless posts you do, I'm surprised your be is high enough to sustain life.

And you don't I suppose!

 

[relic]

It gladdens my old heart to see all the good cunservatives on here leap to the defense of their colleagues in the NDP { the other losers}

 

[tay]

I can see that it really bothers you that Trudeau has stepped squarely in this.

Gotta chuckle every time when one of his apologists has to point somewhere else and attempt a deflection rather than deal with the issue.

BTW - you notice that the new description of what happened is being referred to as a physical molestation?... Best not to let Trudeau around any babies to kiss come election time, we'd hate to see another molestation scandal

In case you haven't grasped over all of my posts regarding Canadian Politics I will clarify my stance for you. I am not a Liberal supporter and only voted for them once when Chretien said he would "rip up nafata".

I belong to no party but would support a Party that I felt had the best interest of the majority of Canadians in their plan.

The last vote I voted Green more as a protest because I did not trust the Liberals and the NDP were out to lunch on the issues.

But at the same time I am just playing along with the 'old stockers' crowd as they froth away at this because I can't and refuse to believe they are serious.

I don't know if the slow mo clip is already on this thread but here it is.....



www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sn9Up-tjmoM

 

[Angstrom]

The NDP are so jealous of Trudeau, it doesn't surprise me one little bit they would fake a assault. It's what any good feminist would do to gain a advantage in a desperate situation.

 

[mentalfloss]

It gladdens my old heart to see all the good cunservatives on here leap to the defense of their colleagues in the NDP { the other losers}

It is funny that conservatives will stop being conservatives just to get at Trudeau.

There must be some epic, ageless salt residing with them.

 

[Angstrom]

It is funny that conservatives will stop being conservatives just to get at Trudeau.

There must be some epic, ageless salt residing with them.

That's not true!! I just proved that wrong in the post above yours.

You sure are good at being wrong mentalfart

 

[mentalfloss]

Yes, Conservatives becoming the most politically correct, social progressives is entirely in character.

 

[Angstrom]

Yes, Conservatives becoming the most politically correct, social progressives is entirely in character.

The NDP using political correctness to entrap and falsely accuse a Prime Minister of Canada of Assault.

That's like a student falsely accusing a teacher of sexually assaulting them. It's nice to see how low the NDP will go to hinder due prosses :lol:

While blocking access to a member of parliament to make his way to go vote.

It's the NDP who are most salty about Trudeau winning the elections :lol:

 

[gerryh]

The NDP are so jealous of Trudeau, it doesn't surprise me one little bit they would fake a assault. It's what any good feminist would do to gain a advantage in a desperate situation.

You do realize, that it's the cons that are foaming at the mouth over this whole thing. Of course you do, you just won't admit it.

 

[Johnnny]

While you guys are arguing over this, it snowed in Alberta..... I know its probably all gone now, but climate change

 

[Angstrom]

You do realize, that it's the cons that are foaming at the mouth over this whole thing. Of course you do, you just won't admit it.

Well then they are wrong and are simply being idiots.
This is a pathetic NDP disgrace faking a assault.

Trudeau is the real victim in this event.
Trudeau is a victim of a fals accusation.

The cons are just using this situation to their advantage. But anyone with any intelligence can see it's only for their own personal political gain.

 

[PoliticalNick]

In case you haven't grasped over all of my posts regarding Canadian Politics I will clarify my stance for you. I am not a Liberal supporter and only voted for them once when Chretien said he would "rip up nafata".

I belong to no party but would support a Party that I felt had the best interest of the majority of Canadians in their plan.

The last vote I voted Green more as a protest because I did not trust the Liberals and the NDP were out to lunch on the issues.

But at the same time I am just playing along with the 'old stockers' crowd as they froth away at this because I can't and refuse to believe they are serious.

I don't know if the slow mo clip is already on this thread but here it is.....



www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sn9Up-tjmoM

Look into the Libertarian party. You will be pleasantly surprised by their platform.

You do realize, that it's the cons that are foaming at the mouth over this whole thing. Of course you do, you just won't admit it.

I'd be just as pi$$ed if Harper or Mulcair tried to play HoC security. I was just as pi$$ed when Harper tried to ram through legislation without debate. Then again I'm not for any of the main 4 parties....I'm a Libertarian.

Well then they are wrong and are simply being idiots.
This is a pathetic NDP disgrace faking a assault.

Trudeau is the real victim in this event.
Trudeau is a victim of a fals accusation.

The cons are just using this situation to their advantage. But anyone with any intelligence can see it's only for their own personal political gain.

Trudeau put himself in this position by having a hissy fit and trying to physically control other members. I have no sympathy for him. He could have stayed in his seat and called security.

What he did is by criminal code definition an assault. I don't think it is a case that any prossecutor would proceed with or get a conviction on but it is still an assault according to black-letter law.

 

[Angstrom]

Trudeau put himself in this position by having a hissy fit and trying to physically control other members. I have no sympathy for him. He could have stayed in his seat and called security.

What he did is by criminal code definition an assault. I don't think it is a case that any prossecutor would proceed with or get a conviction on but it is still an assault according to black-letter law.

Your wrong, For the same reason, saying a women asked to being raped by dressing provocatively makes it her fault she got raped. And that you have no sympathy for a women who got raped who dressed that way. Is also wrong.

Review the slow motion video above. It is clear that it is the women who threw herself on Trudeau. Technically she assaulted him, and she also falsely accused him of doing something he didn't do. And in fact she is at fault from the very beginning by illegally stoping members of voting.

For anyone with any slight intellectual capacity, it's very clear that Trudeau is the victim in this event. And I'm no Justin fan, but I call them as I see them without political bias.

The NDP are the saltiest of them all, They are out for blood :lol:

This is Dirty politics, even beyond Harper . The NDP really take the cake on this one.

 

[captain morgan]

It gladdens my old heart to see all the good cunservatives on here leap to the defense of their colleagues in the NDP { the other losers}

Were you able to get the stains out of your blue dress yet?

In case you haven't grasped over all of my posts regarding Canadian Politics I will clarify my stance for you. I am not a Liberal supporter and only voted for them once when Chretien said he would "rip up nafata".

I belong to no party but would support a Party that I felt had the best interest of the majority of Canadians in their plan.

The last vote I voted Green more as a protest because I did not trust the Liberals and the NDP were out to lunch on the issues.

But at the same time I am just playing along with the 'old stockers' crowd as they froth away at this because I can't and refuse to believe they are serious.

I don't know if the slow mo clip is already on this thread but here it is.....

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sn9Up-tjmoM

... Yet, for someone that is a-political, you refuse to comment on the fiasco while opting to divert attention somewhere else as if that is some form of justification for what happened.

Sure is a funny way to represent objectivity